Not too many of the Henchmen were around yesterday at the other of texts or e-mails and Bryan tends to go far under cover in the final hours before the draft so to suggest there was any new insight is a bit of a stretch.
But the one name I heard linked to these guys more than any other – and not just from people here, either – was Bismack Biyombo, the raw 19-year-old Congo kid.
And if you think of it, maybe going with a big guy and someone young and full of potential is the way to go.
It’s a young group anyway, not likely going to contend for anything other than relative mediocrity next year and another young big, given the alternatives, makes sense.
Now, I’ll say that if Brandon Knight falls to No. 5 – and it would most likely only happen if Utah takes Kanter at No. 3 – they’ll snap him up but of the group that’s likely to be there, why not take a shot at Biyombo, a 6-9 bit of an energetic beast.
This I heard, and it’s paraphrased, about Biyombo from a friend last night who got it from the GM of the team he covers:
“His offensive game isn’t nearly as bad as I was led to believe. Good footwork, just needs coaching.”
Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper
Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- RocLaFamilia
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,657
- And1: 34
- Joined: Mar 23, 2009
- Location: Corner of the DVP and 401
Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
dacrusha wrote:In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.
Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- why22
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,530
- And1: 16
- Joined: Nov 26, 2008
- Location: T Dot
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
So i guess this means were dealing the pick
Basketball_Jones wrote:BC holding Casey accountable would go like this:
BC: so I see you played Andrea quite a bit there when he was struggling
Casey: yeah I know, we needed spacing
BC: play him more (walks away)
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
bboyskinnylegs
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,657
- And1: 26,624
- Joined: Jul 11, 2009
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I had the feeling this was how it would play out. We want Knight, or else we're going for the guy with the highest upside defensively. As a fan of taking Biyombo myself, that's good news to hear (assuming this potential back issue isn't a concern... haven't seen any confirmation of it from other sources, just the bit by Feldman), but I'd be fine with any of Knight/Biyombo/Val.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
totallyr
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,466
- And1: 111
- Joined: Jan 22, 2006
- Location: On the lake, lifes a beach
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Please no
To all our soldiers serving overseas, be safe and come home soon
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
nahom1319
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,933
- And1: 707
- Joined: Nov 24, 2010
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
evidently Le Doug isnt aware that Bismack is 18
<--- May 22 2012Dr Mufasa wrote: I wouldn't bet any of my personal money on Valanciunas being in the NBA after his rookie contract.
http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx14 ... -THG-1.gif
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Yeah, if you look at other vids, his offense doesn't even look that bad (not that it could be any worse than what we saw at the Adidas camp)
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- Raptors_Dynasty
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,284
- And1: 9,081
- Joined: May 24, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
KEMBA BC, KEMBA WALKER.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- kdizzle
- Senior
- Posts: 725
- And1: 33
- Joined: Jul 04, 2003
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I am really happy if we land Brandon Knight. Kinda happy if we get Biyombo. Big men usually take longer to develop so this will be a 2 yrs project IMO with Bismack.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- RocLaFamilia
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,657
- And1: 34
- Joined: Mar 23, 2009
- Location: Corner of the DVP and 401
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
bboyskinnylegs wrote:I had the feeling this was how it would play out. We want Knight, or else we're going for the guy with the highest upside defensively.
I don't know I like upside and all, but I also want a sure thing. What I am hearing about Val is both... If we get Knight I hope BC could get another pick for one of these two guys (BB/Val)
dacrusha wrote:In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.
Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
nahom1319
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,933
- And1: 707
- Joined: Nov 24, 2010
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
totallyr wrote:Please no
I agree Knight is a scrub.
<--- May 22 2012Dr Mufasa wrote: I wouldn't bet any of my personal money on Valanciunas being in the NBA after his rookie contract.
http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx14 ... -THG-1.gif
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
Carlton Banksy
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,348
- And1: 1,017
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Why does nobody mention that he's a 6'9 C? I know he has a massive wingspan, but the guy's still 6'9.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
ADeSilva1984
- Ballboy
- Posts: 31
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 29, 2010
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Yup, we kinda already knew it would be Knight if not available then Biyombo, i have no problem with this scenerio. People who are talking trash about Biyombo really dont know how he plays or seen his clips, he was a man amoung boys againt the 'highly touted' 2012 draft class!! Made Anthony Davis look like a little school boy.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
elmer_yuck
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,633
- And1: 683
- Joined: Dec 17, 2004
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Supercool Beas wrote:Why does nobody mention that he's a 6'9 C? I know he has a massive wingspan, but the guy's still 6'9.
So if we was 6'10" it would be ok?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- RocLaFamilia
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,657
- And1: 34
- Joined: Mar 23, 2009
- Location: Corner of the DVP and 401
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Supercool Beas wrote:Why does nobody mention that he's a 6'9 C? I know he has a massive wingspan, but the guy's still 6'9.
like some people have said, do you block shots with your head or your arms?
dacrusha wrote:In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.
Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
nahom1319
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,933
- And1: 707
- Joined: Nov 24, 2010
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
elmer_yuck wrote:Supercool Beas wrote:Why does nobody mention that he's a 6'9 C? I know he has a massive wingspan, but the guy's still 6'9.
So if we was 6'10" it would be ok?
Does it help that he is 6-9.5
<--- May 22 2012Dr Mufasa wrote: I wouldn't bet any of my personal money on Valanciunas being in the NBA after his rookie contract.
http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx14 ... -THG-1.gif
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
highness
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,637
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 20, 2011
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
BRANDON KNIGHT SON!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
Raptor_Insider
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,195
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
i like biyombo val and walker in our spot somthing about knight just seems blah to me
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
ty123
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,157
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 22, 2011
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I'm tired of getting guys who have 0 swagger.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
Carlton Banksy
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,348
- And1: 1,017
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
RocLaFamilia wrote:bboyskinnylegs wrote:I had the feeling this was how it would play out. We want Knight, or else we're going for the guy with the highest upside defensively.
I don't know I like upside and all, but I also want a sure thing. What I am hearing about Val is both... If we get Knight I hope BC could get another pick for one of these two guys (BB/Val)
If there's any year to take a Valunciunas, this is it - we don't need him right away since we're in the midst of a rebuild, it's a terrible draft & there could very well be a lockout next year. It would suck to wait a year for him to come over though.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,198
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
If it's not one player it will likely be someone else
- The Doug











