Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- rarefind
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,578
- And1: 10,463
- Joined: May 25, 2006
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
smith is a tool, i put no more stock in this guy.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,198
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Looks like The Doug once again received some bad info...
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- The Duke
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,812
- And1: 3,460
- Joined: Jul 18, 2003
- Location: Da Beaches
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
They are just paid puppets...
They get paid, and some listen.
Nothing else, so dont expect anything more.
They get paid, and some listen.
Nothing else, so dont expect anything more.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
RapTelligence
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,342
- And1: 118
- Joined: Sep 11, 2002
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I feel sorry for Le Doug. Totally used by the Colangelo and his boys again.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
Fairview4Life
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,395
- And1: 34,167
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
LittleOzzy wrote:Looks like The Doug once again received some bad info...
To be fair, he also said JV was on our board but didn't expect him to be available.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- RocLaFamilia
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,657
- And1: 34
- Joined: Mar 23, 2009
- Location: Corner of the DVP and 401
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I don't think anyone was sure Val would drop, you guys are just way to hard on Doug.
dacrusha wrote:In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.
Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
raps95
- Junior
- Posts: 303
- And1: 77
- Joined: Dec 21, 2003
- Location: Toronto
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
rarefind wrote:smith is a tool, i put no more stock in this guy.
Are you just disregarding him breaking the Jay firing story? Draft Express, Chad Ford, etc, nobody that I read had Jonas going to us. Why single Doug out for abuse?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- J-Roc
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,150
- And1: 7,553
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Sunnyvale
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
I think BC has confirmed that he would have taken Bismack had Jonas not been available.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
cram
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,180
- And1: 1,699
- Joined: Feb 08, 2004
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
raps95 wrote:rarefind wrote:smith is a tool, i put no more stock in this guy.
Are you just disregarding him breaking the Jay firing story? Draft Express, Chad Ford, etc, nobody that I read had Jonas going to us. Why single Doug out for abuse?
Hi Doug. (or Eric)
Doug himself had Jonas in our top 4, suggesting he was a possibility. MANY had him as a possibility until the 2-3 days before the draft.
ALl that said, no one cares that Doug got it wrong. Its the condescending attitude.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
Jammn
- Banned User
- Posts: 17
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 23, 2011
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
raps95 wrote:rarefind wrote:smith is a tool, i put no more stock in this guy.
Are you just disregarding him breaking the Jay firing story? Draft Express, Chad Ford, etc, nobody that I read had Jonas going to us. Why single Doug out for abuse?
Because Doug has been dead wrong 9.9999 times out of 10 his entire reporting career.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
NH
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,969
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
It was assumed already that Jonas Val was going no. 4 to the Cavs. Not that many people thought TT was going there instead. Its no different from last year when Ed Davis slipped and we picked him up. YES this can be considered a steal as well people.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- RocLaFamilia
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,657
- And1: 34
- Joined: Mar 23, 2009
- Location: Corner of the DVP and 401
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
J-Roc wrote:I think BC has confirmed that he would have taken Bismack had Jonas not been available.
You okay J-Roc? That was almost a supportive, optimistic post involving yourself, BC and the Toronto Raptors. I have not seen a post like this in over a year...
dacrusha wrote:In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.
Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
-
theonlyeastcoastrapsfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,051
- And1: 9,190
- Joined: Mar 14, 2006
- Location: Hotlantic Canada
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Plus Raps not running off to the mouth with media about Val, meant that teams didn't know who they'd need to talk to to trade with that wanted him. Teams like Rockets and Spurs, may have thought they had a chance making a move at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, but no knowing how far he'd slide may have prevented them from being more aggressive for thinking they could nab him later. Heck, Cleveland may have even thought they could get him later.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- J-Roc
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,150
- And1: 7,553
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Sunnyvale
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
RocLaFamilia wrote:J-Roc wrote:I think BC has confirmed that he would have taken Bismack had Jonas not been available.
You okay J-Roc? That was almost a supportive, optimistic post involving yourself, BC and the Toronto Raptors. I have not seen a post like this in over a year...
Stressed out. Started a new job a month ago and I'm starting to burn out. This must be what it's like being on a period. Emotional ups and downs.
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
- plainballing
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,714
- And1: 1,597
- Joined: Sep 25, 2009
-
Re: Doug: If Knights not there then its Bismack
Glad this didn't happened.

http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx144/lillehammer/Turbo_Zone_Little_Ozzy_Davis.jpg











