Charles over Foster?
Moderator: MadNESS
Charles over Foster?
- Bleeding Blue
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,573
- And1: 538
- Joined: Feb 29, 2008
- Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
-
Charles over Foster?
I have the #2 pick in my draft this friday. Assuming AP goes #1 I am considering drafting Charles with the 2nd pick. With Chris Johnson holding out and Fosters hamstring injury I am worried....I am considering trying to trade my #2 pick for the 3 or 4 straight up....thoughts on both?
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"
- Bobby Knight
- Bobby Knight
Re: Charles over Foster?
- Bac2Basics
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,588
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 03, 2001
- Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
-
Re: Charles over Foster?
If you look at my teams, I took Ray Rice as early as 3rd in one of my leagues.
With the first 5-7 guys it's hard to go wrong.
AP, Foster, Charles, Rice, McCoy, Any of those guys should give you 1st round production.
If your worried about Foster's hamstring, take Charles or Rice, you should be fine with any of them.
If it's a PPR league, I'd tend to go with Rice, if not either Rice or Charles
Would appreciate your thought on my teams in the other thread.
With the first 5-7 guys it's hard to go wrong.
AP, Foster, Charles, Rice, McCoy, Any of those guys should give you 1st round production.
If your worried about Foster's hamstring, take Charles or Rice, you should be fine with any of them.
If it's a PPR league, I'd tend to go with Rice, if not either Rice or Charles
Would appreciate your thought on my teams in the other thread.
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
~ Herman Melville
Re: Charles over Foster?
- R33D33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,758
- And1: 15
- Joined: May 01, 2008
- Location: When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Re: Charles over Foster?
If it's PPR go with Charles. But I've heard enough people say Foster would be ready for week one, so I'd go with him in standard formats.
R33D33 wrote:Can we agree on this, get rid of all benefits corporations get from governments?
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." – H.L. MenckenBulltalk wrote:Not really.
Re: Charles over Foster?
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 20
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 30, 2011
Re: Charles over Foster?
I will be in the minority here, but I took Charles over Foster.
Re: Charles over Foster?
- R33D33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,758
- And1: 15
- Joined: May 01, 2008
- Location: When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Re: Charles over Foster?
dungan123 wrote:I will be in the minority here, but I took Charles over Foster.
What type of league was it (PPR)?
R33D33 wrote:Can we agree on this, get rid of all benefits corporations get from governments?
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." – H.L. MenckenBulltalk wrote:Not really.
Re: Charles over Foster?
- ChronicKerr
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,572
- And1: 59
- Joined: May 23, 2007
- Location: Old Town
-
Re: Charles over Foster?
Foster out up to a month now. Don't draft him over Charles, Rice, McCoy, and a handful of others at this point as hammy injuries tend to linger.
Re: Charles over Foster?
- Bleeding Blue
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,573
- And1: 538
- Joined: Feb 29, 2008
- Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
-
Re: Charles over Foster?
ChronicKerr wrote:Foster out up to a month now. Don't draft him over Charles, Rice, McCoy, and a handful of others at this point as hammy injuries tend to linger.
Thats what I hear, leaning towards charles heavy now...non PPR league. Would you guys risk the #2 on Johnson?
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"
- Bobby Knight
- Bobby Knight
Re: Charles over Foster?
- R33D33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,758
- And1: 15
- Joined: May 01, 2008
- Location: When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Re: Charles over Foster?
Bleeding Blue wrote:ChronicKerr wrote:Foster out up to a month now. Don't draft him over Charles, Rice, McCoy, and a handful of others at this point as hammy injuries tend to linger.
Thats what I hear, leaning towards charles heavy now...non PPR league. Would you guys risk the #2 on Johnson?
Ray Rice is probably a safer pick at this point.
R33D33 wrote:Can we agree on this, get rid of all benefits corporations get from governments?
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." – H.L. MenckenBulltalk wrote:Not really.
Re: Charles over Foster?
- Bleeding Blue
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,573
- And1: 538
- Joined: Feb 29, 2008
- Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
-
Re: Charles over Foster?
Now Chris Johnson has signed, you take him at #2?
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"
- Bobby Knight
- Bobby Knight
Re: Charles over Foster?
- R33D33
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,758
- And1: 15
- Joined: May 01, 2008
- Location: When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Re: Charles over Foster?
Bleeding Blue wrote:Now Chris Johnson has signed, you take him at #2?
In non-PPR formats, I like him #3. I would go Peterson, Rice than Johnson because of their consistency. I'd probably put Charles ahead of Johnson only in PPR leagues.
R33D33 wrote:Can we agree on this, get rid of all benefits corporations get from governments?
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." – H.L. MenckenBulltalk wrote:Not really.
Re: Charles over Foster?
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Charles over Foster?
Charles? No, no, no!
Can he beast? Sure.
Is he really risky, like really, really risky? Absolutely.
It seems the eaely report on Foster was premature and he shouldn't miss more then a week.
I might still take him and make sure I get Tate late.
If not, this is easily one of Rice or Chris Johnson and I go Rice all day.
I'd take Rice #1 if I was that worried about Foster, I like him that much.
Can he beast? Sure.
Is he really risky, like really, really risky? Absolutely.
It seems the eaely report on Foster was premature and he shouldn't miss more then a week.
I might still take him and make sure I get Tate late.
If not, this is easily one of Rice or Chris Johnson and I go Rice all day.
I'd take Rice #1 if I was that worried about Foster, I like him that much.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.