Who's worse?

Moderator: TyCobb

SryJTuTigerNow
Banned User
Posts: 5
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 24, 2011

Who's worse? 

Post#1 » by SryJTuTigerNow » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:25 pm

Spam
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,550
And1: 16,337
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Who's worse? 

Post#2 » by Dr Positivity » Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:51 pm

Easily Crawford, just look at that contract. I don't think anybody expected Lackey to be an ace anymore when the Red Sox signed him
Liberate The Zoomers
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,838
And1: 19,323
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Who's worse? 

Post#3 » by Pharmcat » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:55 am

AJ burnet? :dontknow:
Image
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Who's worse? 

Post#4 » by Wade2k6 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:37 am

Dr Mufasa wrote:Easily Crawford, just look at that contract. I don't think anybody expected Lackey to be an ace anymore when the Red Sox signed him

+1. They were still expecting Lackey to be a solid #2 type pitcher when they signed him (even if he was their #3), but after his first year in Boston I think they were more realistic on their views about him (a declining player since '07). However, Crawford is getting paid like a top 5 player in the game, and he was poised for a big year with the firepower the Red Sox have offensively. Expectations were much higher for Crawford this year than Lackey.

Return to The General MLB Board