Week 8: Non-Packers
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Todd Haley is epic failing this drive.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Newz wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Bayless also ranked his top 3 qb's in the league as Brady, Brees and Big Rape.
Is Big Rape code for Aaron Rodgers now? Since he rapes his opponents in a big way?
If not, then lulz.
Bayless is a complete idiot, but he isn't that stupid, he knows that Rodgers is the best QB in the game and he knows that Tebow isn't as good as Skippy proclaims. Bayless says this stuff simply for the reason it's being discussed here, it gets him attention. People end up saying Bayless actually said what?
Then he'll stick to ridiculous beliefs even when those beliefs get exposed as say happened with Tebow on Sunday because Bayless knows that then a bunch of football fans would be dying to tune in see what he'd have to say about the debacle vs Detroit by Tebow. Fans wanting to see Skippy eat some crow, which of course he never will do because irritating people is something that he knows brings attention.
Same with Rodgers. Bayless spent a long time bobbing on Favre's knob after Ted let Brett go, saying it was a massive blunder by Thompson and that Aaron would never be as good. So given that Bayless never admits he's wrong for ratings reasons, Rodgers won't be in his top three.
Bayless is a major tool, but i do give him some credit because this shtick of his that he's created has worked out quite well for him financially, regardless of the fact most sports fans view him as a clown.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,456
- And1: 8,055
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Na'il Diggs sighting.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,668
- And1: 55,960
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I had to pause and rewind when they said his name, I didn't know he was still playing.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,268
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 22, 2008
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I'd be pretty disappointed if we lose to the chargers. They just don't look good at all.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,566
- And1: 13,354
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Why would you blow the whistle on that play? Let it play out and call a td at the end of it. If he didn't make it in, you totally screw up a fumble.
ETA: If they call it a touchdown after the play is over? Is the fumble still reviewable. I'm starting to question it myself.
ETA: If they call it a touchdown after the play is over? Is the fumble still reviewable. I'm starting to question it myself.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,714
- And1: 4,318
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
what is up with all of these non facemask calls. Ive seen 2 or 3 pretty clear facemasks not called
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Why would you blow the whistle on that play? Let it play out and call a td at the end of it. If he didn't make it in, you totally screw up a fumble.
ETA: If they call it a touchdown after the play is over? Is the fumble still reviewable. I'm starting to question it myself.
If it is clearly recovered by one team they can overturn the fumble/recovery.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LOOOOL
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,767
- And1: 6,966
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LAWLZERZ
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,714
- And1: 4,318
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
We're gonna destroy these bums
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
LULZ
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
This moment brought to you by Brett Bielema
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
So you can just run over an offensive lineman when they're trying to spike it and you're trying to get back?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,767
- And1: 6,966
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Man, bad football
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
That fumble is one prime example of why Rivers generally puts up great numbers, but his teams never achieve much. 

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,934
- And1: 27,512
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
I would've lawled if Rivers fumbled the snap again.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,632
- And1: 4,467
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
El Duderino wrote:That fumble is one prime example of why Rivers generally puts up great numbers, but his teams never achieve much.
I don't totally disagree a ton, but that was a one in a million thing.