ImageImage

Week 8: Non-Packers

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#241 » by trwi7 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 2:09 am

Todd Haley is epic failing this drive.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#242 » by El Duderino » Tue Nov 1, 2011 2:18 am

Newz wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Bayless also ranked his top 3 qb's in the league as Brady, Brees and Big Rape.


Is Big Rape code for Aaron Rodgers now? Since he rapes his opponents in a big way?

If not, then lulz. ;)


Bayless is a complete idiot, but he isn't that stupid, he knows that Rodgers is the best QB in the game and he knows that Tebow isn't as good as Skippy proclaims. Bayless says this stuff simply for the reason it's being discussed here, it gets him attention. People end up saying Bayless actually said what?

Then he'll stick to ridiculous beliefs even when those beliefs get exposed as say happened with Tebow on Sunday because Bayless knows that then a bunch of football fans would be dying to tune in see what he'd have to say about the debacle vs Detroit by Tebow. Fans wanting to see Skippy eat some crow, which of course he never will do because irritating people is something that he knows brings attention.

Same with Rodgers. Bayless spent a long time bobbing on Favre's knob after Ted let Brett go, saying it was a massive blunder by Thompson and that Aaron would never be as good. So given that Bayless never admits he's wrong for ratings reasons, Rodgers won't be in his top three.

Bayless is a major tool, but i do give him some credit because this shtick of his that he's created has worked out quite well for him financially, regardless of the fact most sports fans view him as a clown.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,456
And1: 8,055
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#243 » by Mags FTW » Tue Nov 1, 2011 2:54 am

Na'il Diggs sighting.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,660
And1: 55,956
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#244 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Nov 1, 2011 2:55 am

I had to pause and rewind when they said his name, I didn't know he was still playing.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
an_also
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2008

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#245 » by an_also » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:10 am

I'd be pretty disappointed if we lose to the chargers. They just don't look good at all.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,566
And1: 13,354
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#246 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:35 am

Why would you blow the whistle on that play? Let it play out and call a td at the end of it. If he didn't make it in, you totally screw up a fumble.
ETA: If they call it a touchdown after the play is over? Is the fumble still reviewable. I'm starting to question it myself.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,711
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#247 » by BUCKnation » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:41 am

what is up with all of these non facemask calls. Ive seen 2 or 3 pretty clear facemasks not called
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#248 » by chuckleslove » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:49 am

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Why would you blow the whistle on that play? Let it play out and call a td at the end of it. If he didn't make it in, you totally screw up a fumble.
ETA: If they call it a touchdown after the play is over? Is the fumble still reviewable. I'm starting to question it myself.



If it is clearly recovered by one team they can overturn the fumble/recovery.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#249 » by Greatness » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

LOOOOL
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,767
And1: 6,966
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#250 » by LUKE23 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

LMAO
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#251 » by trwi7 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

LAWLZERZ
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,711
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#252 » by BUCKnation » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

:lol: choke
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#253 » by Greatness » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

We're gonna destroy these bums
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#254 » by chuckleslove » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:53 am

LULZ
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#255 » by MadCityBucky » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:55 am

This moment brought to you by Brett Bielema
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#256 » by trwi7 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:56 am

So you can just run over an offensive lineman when they're trying to spike it and you're trying to get back?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,767
And1: 6,966
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#257 » by LUKE23 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:57 am

Man, bad football
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#258 » by El Duderino » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:58 am

That fumble is one prime example of why Rivers generally puts up great numbers, but his teams never achieve much. :D
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,934
And1: 27,512
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#259 » by trwi7 » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:58 am

I would've lawled if Rivers fumbled the snap again.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Week 8: Non-Packers 

Post#260 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:58 am

El Duderino wrote:That fumble is one prime example of why Rivers generally puts up great numbers, but his teams never achieve much. :D


I don't totally disagree a ton, but that was a one in a million thing.

Return to Green Bay Packers