ImageImageImageImageImage

Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford?

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#281 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:40 am

Blue Ninja wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:Please explain how Toney Douglas has more value.

Please don't say defense, because Rondo already killed that thought.


He's younger, he's cheaper, he's on a shorter deal, defense(Rondo kills a ton of players, everyone kills JC), rebounding, shooting and passing.

Now the pros for JC, he can handle the ball more, and is a proven sixth man of the year and has been know as a great scorer.

Id take Toney 9/10 times.

You just made my case for Crawford.

We're talking signing Crawford for a 2 year MLE, you think TD is gonna re-sign for less?

Toney is not a better shooter or passer, stop that.

I really hate getting into these type of stat debates because they really get skewed.

Toney plays on one of the highest paces in the league.

Crawford played on one of the lowest.

Kind of how Felton even though he was not efficient at all, put up all-star type numbers under this system.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
NYKNICKPLAYA
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 218
Joined: Dec 03, 2011

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#282 » by NYKNICKPLAYA » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:43 am

WILL THE HAWKS ACCEPT OUR S & T OFFER?
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#283 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:43 am

KnicksFan007 wrote:Stats do not need to tell me that a 6'5 SG/PG veteran > 6'1 3rd year PG/SG.

If Crawford is motivated to win, he'll play to the level he did as a Sixth Man in Atlanta. How many players are we going to rip that are proven impact role players on teams that kicked our ass for the last 2 seasons? C'mon now. It's getting ridiculous.


For some they live by them, and it quite sad.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
The_Philosopher
Banned User
Posts: 865
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 28, 2011

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#284 » by The_Philosopher » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:44 am

Don't compare Felton's 5 years in the league (all better than Crawford's in efficiency) to Crawford's 12 year career of crap.
User avatar
Hardaway 10
Analyst
Posts: 3,306
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 16, 2003

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#285 » by Hardaway 10 » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:45 am

David Aldridge is tweeting that Kahn wants Barea.

@daldridgetnt David Aldridge
Source: Knicks, Wolves both in strong pursuit of J.J. Barea, who feels "betrayed" that Mavs only offered 1 yr deal. Check Hang Time blog.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#286 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:45 am

Falstaffxx wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:Your posts on this subject are becoming so rife with disregard for the facts that I'm not going to be able to continue the conversation much longer:

-Toney's minutes did NOT "almost double" from year 1 to year 2. They went from 19 minutes to 24 minutes.
-Crawfords numbers did NOT go down solely because he took less shots. They also went down because his shooting percentages went down.
-Toney did NOT "fall off in almost every single category." His rebounds and assists both increased compared to the previous year in a proportion greater than his increase in minutes. His PPG also increased.
-This is in addition to your previous remark that Crawford's "minutes declined" when in reality he played almost identical minutes to the previous year, losing only 55 seconds per game.

If you're going to continue to post on this, please have some regard for the truth. It's disrespectful people who are discussing it with you.



Toney played 56 games in his rookie season at 19 minutes per game. total 1087

His second year he played 82 games at 24 minutes per game. total 1971.

Here you go .......

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/douglto01.html

Crawford.......

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crawfja01.html

Now if you're actually gonna tell me a player who shoots less won't naturally lose production statistically, I should be done with the discussion.


[b]Minutes per game. We're not tallying up their literal totals.


You're right, after this in bold I'm done.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#287 » by Johnny Hoops » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:45 am

GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:We're not making a decision between Douglas playing point guard or acquiring Crawford.

That is essentially the decision if Douglas is getting traded for Crawford though, isn't it?

Both players would basically be playing the same role. It's just a matter of which one do you think would fill it better.


I don't see it that way -- I think Knicks view Jamal as more of a SG option off the bench.

With Toney they are stuck with a guy in a PG sized body that isn't a point guard (lacks the size).

I think you are moving Toney for Jamal but you'd really be swapping out Toney for a Barea or some other veteran point Knicks feel more comfortable distributing ball to stars.

I get sense stars like Toney but not when it comes to getting them the ball where/when they need it.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,779
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#288 » by GONYK » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:47 am

Johnny Hoops wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:We're not making a decision between Douglas playing point guard or acquiring Crawford.

That is essentially the decision if Douglas is getting traded for Crawford though, isn't it?

Both players would basically be playing the same role. It's just a matter of which one do you think would fill it better.


I don't see it that way -- I think Knicks view Jamal as more of a SG option off the bench.

With Toney they are stuck with a guy in a PG sized body that isn't a point guard (lacks the size).

I think you are moving Toney for Jamal but you'd really be swapping out Toney for a Barea or some other veteran point Knicks feel more comfortable distributing ball to stars.

I get sense stars like Toney but not when it comes to getting them the ball where/when they need it.

I'm not sure what you said exactly, but as long as Toney isn't our PG at the end of the day, I don't care.
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#289 » by Johnny Hoops » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:48 am

Falstaffxx wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:I'd love to have Jamal back.

He's a great shooter and penetrator.

I don't want him as our point guard and perhaps not as a starter but I sure want him in the crew


He's not a great shooter. Career 42% shooter with 35% from 3. Last year was 42.1%/34.1%


The distinction with Jamal is that he is great at getting a decent shot off -- at the end of games or when the clock is running down. He won't always make the shot but he has the ability to break virtually anyone down enough to squeeze the trigger on a decent shot.

This is perhaps his biggest skill --- an ability - when defense is fully set to create something out of nothing. That is what the Knicks would want him for....off the bench - late game scoring option.
User avatar
Blue Ninja
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,482
And1: 798
Joined: Jul 17, 2011
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#290 » by Blue Ninja » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:50 am

Thugger HBC wrote:You just made my case for Crawford.

We're talking signing Crawford for a 2 year MLE, you think TD is gonna re-sign for less?

Toney is not a better shooter or passer, stop that.

I really hate getting into these type of stat debates because they really get skewed.

Toney plays on one of the highest paces in the league.

Crawford played on one of the lowest.

Kind of how Felton even though he was not efficient at all, put up all-star type numbers under this system.


Does it matter what TD is going to resign for? He is on a 1 year deal right now and is a RFA after that. With Jamal there is a bust potential. With TD there is little bust potential and he would be a bird player who wouldnt take any exceptions away from us.

He is both a better shooter and passer. JC gets to the basket much better but isnt as good of a shooter.

I havent brought up PPG or stats that the speed of the game would influence so no need for that.

Yeah his stats improved, and im sure that JC's would also, but he is only marginally better on offense and much worse on defense and rebounding. Considering age, it wouldnt be a great move.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#291 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:56 am

Blue Ninja wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:You just made my case for Crawford.

We're talking signing Crawford for a 2 year MLE, you think TD is gonna re-sign for less?

Toney is not a better shooter or passer, stop that.

I really hate getting into these type of stat debates because they really get skewed.

Toney plays on one of the highest paces in the league.

Crawford played on one of the lowest.

Kind of how Felton even though he was not efficient at all, put up all-star type numbers under this system.


Does it matter what TD is going to resign for? He is on a 1 year deal right now and is a RFA after that. With Jamal there is a bust potential. With TD there is little bust potential and he would be a bird player who wouldnt take any exceptions away from us.

He is both a better shooter and passer. JC gets to the basket much better but isnt as good of a shooter.

I havent brought up PPG or stats that the speed of the game would influence so no need for that.

Yeah his stats improved, and im sure that JC's would also, but he is only marginally better on offense and much worse on defense and rebounding. Considering age, it wouldnt be a great move.


Here is the thing, you're basing it on the individual, whereas I'm basing it on a role.

We have no clue what role TD would excel at on this team, but we know Jamal is built for a sixth man role.

This was like the lengthy discussion of Melo vs Durant.

Durant is younger and makes less, so he's a better choice for who's best.

It doesn't work like that in most cases, and doesn't work here.

We are building a contender, the pieces have to fit, and all contenders have players with roles.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
Blue Ninja
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,482
And1: 798
Joined: Jul 17, 2011
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#292 » by Blue Ninja » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:59 am

Thugger HBC wrote:Here is the thing, you're basing it on the individual, whereas I'm basing it on a role.

We have no clue what role TD would excel at on this team, but we know Jamal is built for a sixth man role.

This was like the lengthy discussion of Melo vs Durant.

Durant is younger and makes less, so he's a better choice for who's best.

It doesn't work like that in most cases, and doesn't work here.

We are building a contender, the pieces have to fit, and all contenders have players with roles.


Look I agree as a 6th man JC > TD, but TD is our starting PG right now, with maybe 1 or 2 better options out there. Is it smart to give a starting PG for a 6th man? I dont think so.
User avatar
Anotha Knicks fan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,672
And1: 1,333
Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Location: the last thread you saw me
 

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#293 » by Anotha Knicks fan » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:00 am

Hardaway 10 wrote:David Aldridge is tweeting that Kahn wants Barea.

@daldridgetnt David Aldridge
Source: Knicks, Wolves both in strong pursuit of J.J. Barea, who feels "betrayed" that Mavs only offered 1 yr deal. Check Hang Time blog.

What is it with this guy Kahn? I know we've clowned on him with his point guard fetish... but really... holy crap man. seems like he wants everyone we want.

If we get a real point guard, I don't mind trading Toney in that case to Atlanta for Jamal. If we sign Jamal for the exception, and not trade Toney, I wouldn't be mad. I would just be bewildered if we make a hole we've got even bigger by trading a quasi point for a non point. I don't see how I can make the argument any simpler.
Join me in welcoming in the new Era of our basketball team:

The New York Mediocrebockers!
JCity723NYK
Senior
Posts: 621
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 18, 2010
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#294 » by JCity723NYK » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:00 am

Get this man back on the Knicks!!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_LAAjEKCVY[/youtube]
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#295 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:04 am

Blue Ninja wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:Here is the thing, you're basing it on the individual, whereas I'm basing it on a role.

We have no clue what role TD would excel at on this team, but we know Jamal is built for a sixth man role.

This was like the lengthy discussion of Melo vs Durant.

Durant is younger and makes less, so he's a better choice for who's best.

It doesn't work like that in most cases, and doesn't work here.

We are building a contender, the pieces have to fit, and all contenders have players with roles.


Look I agree as a 6th man JC > TD, but TD is our starting PG right now, with maybe 1 or 2 better options out there. Is it smart to give a starting PG for a 6th man? I dont think so.


I don't view TD as a starting PG, I don't think anyone will.

He will start if we have nothing else, and right now we don't.

Jared Jeffries started a few games for us too. Is he a starting center too?

Keith Bogans started as SG for the Bulls.

D'antoni, Melo, and Amar'e know Toney will not have that ball.

D'antoni made it clear melo will run the offense.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#296 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:07 am

JCity723NYK wrote:Get this man back on the Knicks!!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_LAAjEKCVY[/youtube]


This one......

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRNdN1xCkGk[/youtube]
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
NYMNYKFN10
Analyst
Posts: 3,318
And1: 1,605
Joined: Jun 29, 2010
   

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#297 » by NYMNYKFN10 » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:08 am

BTW, whoever posted that pic of Crawford posting a pic Knicks' uniform on his Twitter, that was from November.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,814
And1: 15,316
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#298 » by ibraheim718 » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:10 am

So the pacers ended up getting David West.
User avatar
Blue Ninja
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,482
And1: 798
Joined: Jul 17, 2011
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#299 » by Blue Ninja » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:12 am

Thugger HBC wrote:I don't view TD as a starting PG, I don't think anyone will.

He will start if we have nothing else, and right now we don't.

Jared Jeffries started a few games for us too. Is he a starting center too?

Keith Bogans started as SG for the Bulls.

D'antoni, Melo, and Amar'e know Toney will not have that ball.

D'antoni made it clear melo will run the offense.


Maybe I just like TD more then most. I feel like hes an adequate starter. Those guys you mentioned are just backups or scrubs. Toney is a legit player. I remember last year he played very well when Billups was out. He was handling the ball and playing pick and roll well. I like him better than JJ Barea and the only guy Id start over TD is Baron if he is waived/amnesty'd.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Knicks emerge as front runners for Jamal Crawford? 

Post#300 » by Thugger HBC » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:12 am

ibraheim718 wrote:So the pacers ended up getting David West.


All I saw was this.....

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Y! Sources: As Boston and David West come down to wire on completing deal, Indiana waits to swoop and steal him. tinyurl.com/carkurz
6 minutes ago
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten

Return to New York Knicks