GONYK wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:If we can add him without losing Douglas and ideally Shumpert then we would be insane to pause even for a second.
This is how championship teams are made. Guys like Candler and Crawford next to stars like Carmelo and Amare.
Fields is totally expendable for Crawford. Tough to say as I'd love to keep him.
Let's hope Jamal will come here for less cash and we can really have something special.
We may not want to admit it but a catch and shoot, quick transition offensive threat like Jamal is something we desperately need!
How is Fields expendable and Douglas isn't if Crawford and Douglas play the same position?
Because they don't and they don't play the same way.
Douglas can and does guard PGs and smaller SGs well.
Fields is a good defender on some Sgs and some SFs but not good in pick and roll defense and not good on either bigger or smaller/quicker options.
Both are good rebounders with fields obviously better.
Douglas is a vastly superior scorer.
IMO Douglas has more of a role on this team playing a scoring PG role vs fields utility SG role.
With Fields we will have to play more of Bibby to take advantage of double teams.
Bibby and Jamal is a nightmare on defense.
With Douglas we can play less of Bibby and when we do we can use him as a play maker and spot up shooter.
With Douglas we can run Jamal and Douglas together in the backcourt without offensive weaknesses and with some defensive versatility.
If we added Jamal it'd be great to have Fields on the team but Douglas is far more important then fields IMO.




















