ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 NBA Draft

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,894
And1: 1,063
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#701 » by The Consiglieri » Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:15 pm

theboomking wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:What would be the cost of moving up to get Davis if we are hosed in the lottery, from 4, 3, 2 or 1? What do you think? I have a feeling we'll be finishing with the absolute worst, or 2nd worst record, but thats only giving us a 30+ or 25+ percent chance to get him, if we drop, what will it cost?


I am also curious about this. Problem is, we have very few trade assets. I'm in favor of locking up McGee to a front loaded deal so we at least have him as a trade chip. I still believe McGee's best value to the team is as a trade chip. From 4 to 1? I don't think anyone would trade down from first to the fourth slot, the way Anthony Davis is playing. No if you pick second, you might be able to swap up if some team is tantalized by Drummond's potential.


I doubt it too, which is why its imperative to really, really suck. We have to be worst in the league bad so that the most likely scenario is we land a top 2-3 pick. If we're there, we're relatively okay, and more often than not, the worst team usually lands a top 3 pick, not the worst case scenario 4th overall, and quite often a top 2. I think a top 3 pick allows for a trade up but like you I can only imagine Vesely, Singleton, Wall, and McGee and future unprotected (to some degree) #1's being the only assets that could move us to #1. I dont know which players it would take. The contenders for the #1 pick in my view are:

The Anthony Davis or Bust Crew:

1. Us-we look clearly to be the worst team period, and only have about 14-15 games that you'd give us a 50/50 coin flips chance of winning over the last 53 games (i say that not expecting us to go .250 the rest of the way, but rather to suggest how many games match us up against teams and in situations (rested) where we'd have a decent chance of winning, rather than be screwed). We will of course win a game or two or three that none of us would expect us to win, but probably do no better than split the winnable games, dropping us in my view to a team with a ceiling of probably 15-51, what's the floor? I'd argue probably 8-58, and the expectation is about 11-55.

Expectation: Should be worst, especially with trade deadline deals of dead weight and cancers.


2. Charlotte 3-12

Generally picked along with us, Toronto and Sacramento to suck out loud and form the basis of the bottom four.

Expectation: Wont be worst. A little too much mid-level talent and too little knucklehead factor to plumb those depths.

3. Toronto 4-8

Currently outperforming expectations, awful roster, no difference makers, kind of like Wizards North, except unlike us, when faced with a miserable draft that might not help them, they still took the best guy on the board rather than trade the pick for some bench scrubs.

Expectation: While they should be truly horrible, they aren't playing like it. Wont be worst.

4. Sacramento: 4-10

Much like the Wizards, the rebuild seems to have gone astray, unlike us, they didn't deal crucial picks for useless vets who'd be a free agent in a year. Potential for implosion huge with Cousins around, however Westphal's canning may let the steam out of that stress.

Expectation: Could easily swing a 0-15 streak, and finish last. A threat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dark Horse Contenders:

5. Detroit: 3-11

Going nowhere, not much talent, have completely imploded, much like Sacramento, could swing a massive month long collapse without a problem.

Expectation: Will be bad, but won't be bad enough.

6. New Jersey 3-11

Williams disappointing, team in flux, a waiting game for Howard, and maybe a fantasy at that.

Expectation: Too much pride to trade Williams, they have room to stink. Will finish top 3-5 worst. Just not there right now.

7. Milwaukee 4-9

Dark horse crummy contender, they could really plunge low and fast, particularly with simply 1 or 2 injuries to particular players.

Expectation: I think they will climb into the bottom 5 or 6 by the end of the year.

8. New Orleans 3-10

Supposed to be awful after Paul trade but they got nice nice pieces in that deal and it should allow them to unfortunately (for them) climb out of the bottom of the beast.

Who would be the best fits for these teams? I think these are the likely locks for the bottom eight. I have a hard time seeing us finish any better then 28th, 29th or 30th overall in record, 30th is the better bet for now. One of the few positives is it does seem as if teams like Toronto, New Jersey and Sacramento aren't necessairly the best fits for Davis, while Charlotte and Detroit would keep the pick no matter what. I do believe all teams would be inclined to keep Davis regardless of the scenario in play, but in the worst case scenario that we fall, I'd prefer a team like Toronto, New Jersey or Sacramento to be the team in that slot to at least give us a potential shot at a deal up.

My top 5 for now:

1. Davis
2. MKG
--------------------------
3. Drummond
--------------------------
4. Thomas Robinson
5. Sully or PJIII (PJIII only after mental make up interview that he would have to pass with flying colors)
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,728
And1: 4,574
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#702 » by closg00 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:39 pm

Good stuff re-capping the tank-battle Consiglieri. Being a Wiz fan, I am not expecting to get that #1 pick, Top-3 is more likely. The battle will be really fierce those last 10-15 games.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,894
And1: 1,063
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#703 » by The Consiglieri » Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:28 pm

Neither am I, but I look at the top 4 and I can live with any of those options, so the worst record, or the second worst record and I think we're fine. We do not absolutely have to have Davis to make this worthwhile, getting Davis, or MKG is my imperative, with fall backs being Drummond (maybe parlaying his potential into something in a trade), or Sully, or Robinson, or a fast climber besides Robinson (which almost certainly will happen with so many kids that are freshmen and sophmores trying to break out in these last 10 weeks). It will be an exciting 10 weeks, and then an exciting last two weeks as the Wiz try to perfect their Abrams Super Tank down the stretch (and for the record, I want Davis and would trade anything off the roster for him, and/or any player(s) and picks, and I think that could possibly get it done so long as we have a top 3-4 pick with so many fantastic players in this draft, a team seeing itself as reaming us of picks and McGee or Wall or whatever just to move down 2-3 slots and get a Sully, Robinson, Drummond or MKG, would not be earth shattering to me, especially considering that teams like New Jersey, and Toronto already have either just drafted, recently drafted, or are going after guys that would somewhat or completely duplicate the asset that is Davis).
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#704 » by rockymac52 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:14 pm

2007-08
Michael Beasley's freshman season at Kansas State

26.2 PPG
12.4 RPG
1.6 BPG
1.2 APG
1.3 SPG
2.9 TOPG
9.3 - 17.5 FGPG (53.2%)
1.1 - 2.9 3PPG (37.9%)
6.5 - 8.5 FTPG (77.4%)

Interpret as you'd like.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,661
And1: 23,153
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#705 » by nate33 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:20 pm

rockymac52 wrote:2007-08
Michael Beasley's freshman season at Kansas State

26.2 PPG
12.4 RPG
1.6 BPG
1.2 APG
1.3 SPG
2.9 TOPG
9.3 - 17.5 FGPG (53.2%)
1.1 - 2.9 3PPG (37.9%)
6.5 - 8.5 FTPG (77.4%)

Interpret as you'd like.

Interesting numbers. Certainly, it's a warning sign not to jump to conclusions too quickly. That said, Beasley posted huge numbers because he was a highly developed "man among boys" in college. Just by looking at him, you had little reason to expect significant improvement going forward. His skills were already polished and he was physically mature. (I have some similar concerns about Sullinger.) Beasley also had a tweener build. He doesn't have a clear position in the NBA.

Davis looks to me like a guy who puts up equally as impressive numbers, but he does so with a limited mastery of big man skills and with a body he hasn't yet grown into. Heck, he might be finished growing yet. And with his length and athleticism, he looks like he could play either PF or C. (Not a "tweener" but a "both").
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#706 » by rockymac52 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:21 pm

In other news, Anthony Davis is a monster. In the middle of the game last night he set Kentucky's single season record for blocks. There are still 12 games left in the season. This isn't some school with no history either here, this is KENTUCKY. I'm thoroughly impressed.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#707 » by rockymac52 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:24 pm

Also I'm beginning to watch more and more of Kentucky because 1. they're really good and 2. there's a good chance the Wizards end up with somebody on this team.

I can't help but smile while watching Davis play these days, but the problem is I'm getting too attached. I'm starting to see him as "my" guy, and I all but expect him to be on the Wizards next season.

Of course, even if the Wizards continue to suck and have the worst record in the NBA, that's only a 25% chance at the #1 pick or so. Which aren't very good odds all things considered. This sucks. I just want to suck and be comfortable knowing we're going to get Davis.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#708 » by fishercob » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:26 pm

With wikipedia down today, I'm having trouble finding accurate lotto odds.
Is it true that with the worst record we'd only have about a 64% chance at a top-3 pick and a 36% chance of picking 4th -- higher odds than of picking any one of 1st, second, or third?
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#709 » by rockymac52 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:26 pm

Random thought, and almost definitely not realistic in any way, BUT...

In a few years, would an NBA team with a starting lineup of Marquis Teague, Doron Lamb, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Terrence Jones, and Anthony Davis be one of the best in the NBA?

Can we just draft all of Kentucky and call it a day? It'd be fun at the very least. We'd also inherit an incredibly passionate fan base.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,661
And1: 23,153
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#710 » by nate33 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:28 pm

fishercob wrote:With wikipedia down today, I'm having trouble finding accurate lotto odds.
Is it true that with the worst record we'd only have about a 64% chance at a top-3 pick and a 36% chance of picking 4th -- higher odds than of picking any one of 1st, second, or third?

Yes. If I remember correctly, that's about right. We have a greater chance of landing 4th than in any other slot.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#711 » by rockymac52 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:32 pm

fishercob wrote:With wikipedia down today, I'm having trouble finding accurate lotto odds.
Is it true that with the worst record we'd only have about a 64% chance at a top-3 pick and a 36% chance of picking 4th -- higher odds than of picking any one of 1st, second, or third?


Worst record odds:
1st pick: 25%
2nd pick: 21.5%
3rd pick: 17.76%
4th pick: 35.74%

Wow. Never thought of it like that. That's so discouraging.
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#712 » by 7-Day Dray » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:41 pm

rockymac52 wrote:
fishercob wrote:With wikipedia down today, I'm having trouble finding accurate lotto odds.
Is it true that with the worst record we'd only have about a 64% chance at a top-3 pick and a 36% chance of picking 4th -- higher odds than of picking any one of 1st, second, or third?


Worst record odds:
1st pick: 25%
2nd pick: 21.5%
3rd pick: 17.76%
4th pick: 35.74%

Wow. Never thought of it like that. That's so discouraging.


And knowing our luck, we'll probably drop to 4th if we get the worst record. :roll:

Just :pray: for the #1 pick.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#713 » by Illuminaire » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:42 pm

As Simmon's has said, there's no lottery this year... NO has the #1 pick locked down. ;)
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#714 » by Illuminaire » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:43 pm

You know, even though I winked there and told myself I was just joking... there's just enough stubborn arbitrariness in Stern that I can't rule such a thing out.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#715 » by fishercob » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:59 pm

Ok, well I'm going to resist the desire to be excessively grim and point out that this is a much better draft to get screwed from first to fourth than say, last year's would have been. What's our worst case scenario at 4th? MKG? Robinson? If both those guys go top 3 then we're choosing from Drummond, Sullinger, Barnes, etc. I suppose that's the worst case and I view it as pretty unlikely.

So to quantify it, let's say there's a 1 in 3 chance that Drummond drops to 4th. The odds of both that happening and us dropping to 4th are about 12%

I think there's an overwhelming chance we come out of this draft with a potential multiple-time all-star.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,012
And1: 10,548
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#716 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:00 pm

fishercob wrote:I dont see the Duncan comparisons. Timmy had a pretty polished back to the basket game. I don't see that from Davis. The KG stuff is easier to see, given his frame and how he runs the floor and owns the boards.

I am not comparing his game to Duncan's. I am just saying Anthony Davis has the talent to be a franchise changer in the NBA, like Tim Duncan.

Someone early compared Davis to Kenyon Martin. IMO Davis is like Kenyon Martin on defense, only taller, and with KG's handle and fluidity. He's more physical than KG, however.

I think Davis has deferred to his teammates, too. He's really, really good.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#717 » by Illuminaire » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:10 pm

No, no Fish. Grim is how the Wiz will inevitably put together some kind of insane late season surge, winning five of ten games to bump themselves to the fourth or fifth worst record.... and then fall down to seventh or eighth in the lottery.

With the seventh pick in the 2012 NBA Draft, the Washington Wizards select... Perry Jones III!
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,894
And1: 1,063
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#718 » by The Consiglieri » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:16 pm

I'm focused on the 2/3's chance more or less of a top 3 pick, and I am just figuring that a jump of 1 team or 2 may happen, but 3 is unlikely. We just need to suck enough to be #1 going into the lottery. Better shot at a top 3 pick that way. I dont want to be second or third worst, and be in a scenario where we drop to the bottom 5 or 6 in a worst case lottery (and we know, we always seem to get as expected, or hosed, never better-save Wall (I dont count Kwame because I dont count Kwame).

If we're locked in at worst, or 2nd worst, we can find 5 guys we think could make a big difference, but once we're in PJIII territory it starts to get a little nerve wracking.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,661
And1: 23,153
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#719 » by nate33 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:04 pm

fishercob wrote:Ok, well I'm going to resist the desire to be excessively grim and point out that this is a much better draft to get screwed from first to fourth than say, last year's would have been. What's our worst case scenario at 4th? MKG? Robinson? If both those guys go top 3 then we're choosing from Drummond, Sullinger, Barnes, etc. I suppose that's the worst case and I view it as pretty unlikely.

So to quantify it, let's say there's a 1 in 3 chance that Drummond drops to 4th. The odds of both that happening and us dropping to 4th are about 12%

I think there's an overwhelming chance we come out of this draft with a potential multiple-time all-star.

Yeah, as long as we stay in the top 4, I'm not too worried. Davis is my first choice and Robinson is my second. I think Robinson will be there at #4. Robinson will probably be better than Davis over the first year or two because of his more consistent midrange jumper.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,319
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: 2012 NBA Draft 

Post#720 » by queridiculo » Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:11 pm

Illuminaire wrote:No, no Fish. Grim is how the Wiz will inevitably put together some kind of insane late season surge, winning five of ten games to bump themselves to the fourth or fifth worst record.... and then fall down to seventh or eighth in the lottery.

With the seventh pick in the 2012 NBA Draft, the Washington Wizards select... Perry Jones III!


Bahaha, totally.

Return to Washington Wizards