Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,360
- And1: 51
- Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
You never wanna give up on a game, but I give this thing 2 more minutes and if we haven't cut into the score much, go ahead and concede defeat because we have to go to Chicago tomorrow night.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,360
- And1: 51
- Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,596
- And1: 283
- Joined: Jun 24, 2005
- Location: Location: Location:
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Perimeter defense is so scared of the three it's letting guys get by.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,804
- And1: 130
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
I'm willing to throw in the towel ha. They looked like they'd given up when Orlando went on their run. That's why I was amazed Granger ended the drought and Collison burned it down the floor to score 4 in a row. The only reason that happened though was because Redick missed a wide open 3. The Magic's ball movement has made the Pacers defense look like trash. They were able to make two-three passes and get wide open just about every time for a three. That's gotta be fixed because it was horrible
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,804
- And1: 130
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Btw, glad I went with beer. My college team is getting thrashed too. smh
Almost done with number 2! Number 2 is what this game has been.
Almost done with number 2! Number 2 is what this game has been.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,804
- And1: 130
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
We've got these guys number in the 2. Yeeeeeaaah
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,360
- And1: 51
- Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
While, yes, the Pacers did not play well, when Orlando shoots the way they have, especially from midway through the second quarter on, not much you can do about that. A handful of these threes have been fairly contested, they just caught fire.
Bounce-back against Chicago tomorrow night.
Bounce-back against Chicago tomorrow night.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,357
- And1: 158
- Joined: Jul 13, 2005
-
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Shaw at halftime said the Pacers needed to push the ball and get shots before the defense is set.
While I don't at all mind getting some quickies (if they're napping) I thought that his take was just the wrong approach.
I've rarely seen us look sharp playing that way. Most ofen the D does get back and a young team can find switching gears and being patient hard to do.
Pace in general is hard for us.
Rush back on D-
Work the ball on O (inside out when possible)-
is our best bet.
While I don't at all mind getting some quickies (if they're napping) I thought that his take was just the wrong approach.
I've rarely seen us look sharp playing that way. Most ofen the D does get back and a young team can find switching gears and being patient hard to do.
Pace in general is hard for us.
Rush back on D-
Work the ball on O (inside out when possible)-
is our best bet.
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
- Pacersike
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,401
- And1: 836
- Joined: Jun 10, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Re: Game 16: Pacers vs Magic 01/24/12, 7:00 EST
Coach has hopefully learned a few things out of this match.
- you don't want Paul George chasing down dwarfs over several screens
he is so much better one on one and putting pressure on the ballhandler
- when Hibbert is tired, take him out
he cost us a few easy buckets
And I hope Bird has seen what I have seen
- we need a guy who can create and generate double teams before they can trap one of our guys with a double team
- if teams offer the max for a player who gives up easy layups like that (I count 7), I would let them
- you don't want Paul George chasing down dwarfs over several screens
he is so much better one on one and putting pressure on the ballhandler
- when Hibbert is tired, take him out
he cost us a few easy buckets
And I hope Bird has seen what I have seen
- we need a guy who can create and generate double teams before they can trap one of our guys with a double team
- if teams offer the max for a player who gives up easy layups like that (I count 7), I would let them