ImageImageImage

Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

What Would You Do With Beasley?

Sign him for $22 for 3 years
19
32%
Hold onto him and see if he improves - cost more or cost less
19
32%
Look to trade him before deadline.
20
34%
Just curious
1
2%
 
Total votes: 59

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#1 » by shrink » Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:54 am

Would you lock him up with medium money, say $8/$7/$7 = $22 for 3 years today, or see how it plays out?

He may improve, and cost $44 for 4. (10/11/11/12)

He may still struggle, and be a MLE player ($5 x 3 = $15) or someone we trade.

Today's the deadline. Would you sign him at $22?
User avatar
mvplayur
Junior
Posts: 413
And1: 86
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#2 » by mvplayur » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:01 am

Trade him. He doesn't bring anything to the table other than being another scoring option.
ybnd wrote:The fact is when they lose game 7 in the FIRST ROUND remember me fool...Klay Thompson does not play defense...and all the warriors do is run it up on **** teams....1st round exit
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#3 » by Saltine » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:09 am

He has nice potential, some quality skills, and he seems like a good guy, his drug issue is fairly minor, at least it's weed, not coke or liquor. I think his only real issue is his emotional maturity, which should take care of itself over the next couple years. He has gotten a very bad rap as he seems to fit a few handy stereotypes, which from a GM's point of view is great, he will get offers lower then his talent suggests.

I would definitely wait, he's restricted anyways, let the league determine his worth, then match/beat the offer... that said, if he was willing to do something like 3 years 20 million, last year being a team option, I'd be inclined to cut the deal today.
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#4 » by Saltine » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:10 am

mvplayur wrote:Trade him. He doesn't bring anything to the table other than being another scoring option.


LOL, that is the entire point. Can't win without points.
;)
Reddy83
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,768
And1: 403
Joined: Jan 11, 2012

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#5 » by Reddy83 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:25 am

We are obviously struggling with legitimate scoring options outside of Love now that we are so banged up. Beas legitimately can get his own (not always great) shot. Additionally, on many teams he can be a 20+ point scorer. On almost any team he can be a 15 point scorer and that is valuable enough to trade.

If Williams was closer to a deal, you'd have to think about it, but with him on a rookie deal, just pay for BEZ and trade him later if a good SG or center option presents itself where he is a point of interest.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#6 » by Vindicater » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:51 am

No way, see what he is offered on the open-market.

His value is not great at the moment, the Restricted Offer should not be too high.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,587
And1: 13,855
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#7 » by Effigy » Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:20 am

Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#8 » by AQuintus » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:10 am

Effigy wrote:Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.


Derrick Williams = PF

Michael Beasley = SF

Trading away Beasley does absolutely nothing to help Williams' minutes.
Image
User avatar
mark blunt
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 14, 2009

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#9 » by mark blunt » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:21 am

Batum and Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging. Watching these games with Beas out I can't help but think it'd be nice to have him in the lineup at times, but my rational side has come to terms with the fact that he can't fulfill the role that we expect out of him on a regular basis.

Ideally he'll exercise his option for next year and then go UFA. Depending on the players available in FA, we'd probably be best renouncing his rights altogether.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:I am envious of your team. Apologize to GM Kahn for me. Just an excellent securing of assets albeit in a round about way.
His method was goofy and quirky at first, wasting picks on all those PG's but in the end he seems to have gotten it done.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#10 » by shangrila » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:22 am

It would force Adelman to play Williams at the 3 more, so he might develop a little faster.

I wouldn't extend him now. He was struggling before he got injured so see how he does when he comes back. Also, we might need to just let him go during the offseason for capspace.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#11 » by AQuintus » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:29 am

shangrila wrote:It would force Adelman to play Williams at the 3 more, so he might develop a little faster.


It's more likely that Wes Johnson and Anthony Tolliver would play more, which isn't a good thing.
Image
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#12 » by Narf » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:45 am

I'm fine with extending him then trading him in the offseason if he doesn't fit in.
I'm also fine with waiting and giving him the QO.
Either way is better than letting him walk. He has value whether you personally like him or not, and we shouldn't waste the asset.
weasel
Junior
Posts: 287
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2011
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#13 » by weasel » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:44 pm

AQuintus wrote:
Effigy wrote:Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.


Derrick Williams = PF

Michael Beasley = SF

Trading away Beasley does absolutely nothing to help Williams' minutes.


I don't understand the rational to trade away a better player just to see if the lesser player develops. And Williams has started the last two games at the 3, and hasn't sucked. Both he and Beas are PFs that need to learn how to play SF if they want to be successful in this league.
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,737
And1: 328
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#14 » by Biff Cooper » Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:01 pm

When do we need to decide if we're giving him the QO? (edit June 30)

I wouldn't have offered him an extension right now. He is way too often a negative value to the Wolves on the court. A negative value on the court isn't someone you want locked into any amount of salary for multiple years. With an $8.2 mil QO, that is somewhat questionable as well - even if it is just one year.

Sure he's young and has a lot of potential, but if he can't show some consistancy and team game skills before we need to offer him the QO, we are probably better off trading him or letting him walk.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#15 » by jpatrick » Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:35 pm

mark blunt wrote:Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging.


Besides the Love extension this is what I took out of yesterday. Now I don't think we'll be able to sign him as a RFA because NO will simply match (if we can even muster up the cap space). They are not going to lose him and get nothing in return. However, given Gordon's injury history and the fact the NBA still owns the Hornets, they might not be willing to pay the 4yr 58m deal he's going to receive from another team this offseason and instead of putting themselves in the situation of matching or losing him, they could be willing to make a deal at this year's trade deadline.

Some combo of Williams/Besley for Ariza/Gordon is a very nice initial offer or make it bigger and include Okafor and Darko plus fillers if NO wants to save money.
re49gb_2gho32fp
Banned User
Posts: 3,196
And1: 14
Joined: Jun 02, 2010

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#16 » by re49gb_2gho32fp » Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:04 pm

Rest assured that the first thing Kahn does in FA is to hand an offersheet to Batum.

Might make a play for Wallace as well.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,295
And1: 19,306
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#17 » by shrink » Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:25 pm

jpatrick wrote:
mark blunt wrote:Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging.


Besides the Love extension this is what I took out of yesterday. Now I don't think we'll be able to sign him as a RFA because NO will simply match (if we can even muster up the cap space). They are not going to lose him and get nothing in return. However, given Gordon's injury history and the fact the NBA still owns the Hornets, they might not be willing to pay the 4yr 58m deal he's going to receive from another team this offseason and instead of putting themselves in the situation of matching or losing him, they could be willing to make a deal at this year's trade deadline.

Some combo of Williams/Besley for Ariza/Gordon is a very nice initial offer or make it bigger and include Okafor and Darko plus fillers if NO wants to save money.


By not giving Eric Gordon an extension, he would be easier for NOH to trade, because he doesn't pick up the Poison Pill Provision. That would make his salary the average of this year and all the extended years, which makes it difficult to salary match.
Jodi
Banned User
Posts: 4,520
And1: 52
Joined: Jul 23, 2011

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#18 » by Jodi » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:16 pm

The Pistons might be interested in Beasley...Don't be surprised if Dumars makes a phone call to Kahn...
Fire Mchale
Junior
Posts: 407
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 03, 2010

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#19 » by Fire Mchale » Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:03 am

Jodi wrote:The Pistons might be interested in Beasley...Don't be surprised if Dumars makes a phone call to Kahn...


Dumars: "Is this David Kahn?"
Kahn: "This is."
Dumars: "What do you want for Michael Beasley? We can offer you Charlie Villanueva or Jason Maxiell."
Kahn: "I know who Maxiell is, but who is this Villanueva guy?"
Dumars: "You'd love him, he's long and relatively athletic. We owe him 24M over the next 3 years, but he average 11 a night for us last year. Oh, and get this, he's played a total of 6 minutes this season in two games so his legs are going to be really fresh!"
Kahn: "How about you keep Maxiell and Vallanueva and give us a top-5 protected first instead?"

......dial tone.......
Jodi
Banned User
Posts: 4,520
And1: 52
Joined: Jul 23, 2011

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..? 

Post#20 » by Jodi » Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:12 am

@Fire Mchale: Remember my last statement and your cute little skit...Lets talk again after the trade deadline...

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves