Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,295
- And1: 19,306
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Would you lock him up with medium money, say $8/$7/$7 = $22 for 3 years today, or see how it plays out?
He may improve, and cost $44 for 4. (10/11/11/12)
He may still struggle, and be a MLE player ($5 x 3 = $15) or someone we trade.
Today's the deadline. Would you sign him at $22?
He may improve, and cost $44 for 4. (10/11/11/12)
He may still struggle, and be a MLE player ($5 x 3 = $15) or someone we trade.
Today's the deadline. Would you sign him at $22?
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- mvplayur
- Junior
- Posts: 413
- And1: 86
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Trade him. He doesn't bring anything to the table other than being another scoring option.
ybnd wrote:The fact is when they lose game 7 in the FIRST ROUND remember me fool...Klay Thompson does not play defense...and all the warriors do is run it up on **** teams....1st round exit
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- Saltine
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,396
- And1: 1,002
- Joined: Jul 20, 2003
- Location: Land o' Lakes
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
He has nice potential, some quality skills, and he seems like a good guy, his drug issue is fairly minor, at least it's weed, not coke or liquor. I think his only real issue is his emotional maturity, which should take care of itself over the next couple years. He has gotten a very bad rap as he seems to fit a few handy stereotypes, which from a GM's point of view is great, he will get offers lower then his talent suggests.
I would definitely wait, he's restricted anyways, let the league determine his worth, then match/beat the offer... that said, if he was willing to do something like 3 years 20 million, last year being a team option, I'd be inclined to cut the deal today.
I would definitely wait, he's restricted anyways, let the league determine his worth, then match/beat the offer... that said, if he was willing to do something like 3 years 20 million, last year being a team option, I'd be inclined to cut the deal today.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- Saltine
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,396
- And1: 1,002
- Joined: Jul 20, 2003
- Location: Land o' Lakes
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
mvplayur wrote:Trade him. He doesn't bring anything to the table other than being another scoring option.
LOL, that is the entire point. Can't win without points.

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,768
- And1: 403
- Joined: Jan 11, 2012
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
We are obviously struggling with legitimate scoring options outside of Love now that we are so banged up. Beas legitimately can get his own (not always great) shot. Additionally, on many teams he can be a 20+ point scorer. On almost any team he can be a 15 point scorer and that is valuable enough to trade.
If Williams was closer to a deal, you'd have to think about it, but with him on a rookie deal, just pay for BEZ and trade him later if a good SG or center option presents itself where he is a point of interest.
If Williams was closer to a deal, you'd have to think about it, but with him on a rookie deal, just pay for BEZ and trade him later if a good SG or center option presents itself where he is a point of interest.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- Vindicater
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,948
- And1: 423
- Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
No way, see what he is offered on the open-market.
His value is not great at the moment, the Restricted Offer should not be too high.
His value is not great at the moment, the Restricted Offer should not be too high.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- Effigy
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,587
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Nov 27, 2001
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Effigy wrote:Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.
Derrick Williams = PF
Michael Beasley = SF
Trading away Beasley does absolutely nothing to help Williams' minutes.

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- mark blunt
- Sophomore
- Posts: 174
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 14, 2009
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Batum and Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging. Watching these games with Beas out I can't help but think it'd be nice to have him in the lineup at times, but my rational side has come to terms with the fact that he can't fulfill the role that we expect out of him on a regular basis.
Ideally he'll exercise his option for next year and then go UFA. Depending on the players available in FA, we'd probably be best renouncing his rights altogether.
Ideally he'll exercise his option for next year and then go UFA. Depending on the players available in FA, we'd probably be best renouncing his rights altogether.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:I am envious of your team. Apologize to GM Kahn for me. Just an excellent securing of assets albeit in a round about way.
His method was goofy and quirky at first, wasting picks on all those PG's but in the end he seems to have gotten it done.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
It would force Adelman to play Williams at the 3 more, so he might develop a little faster.
I wouldn't extend him now. He was struggling before he got injured so see how he does when he comes back. Also, we might need to just let him go during the offseason for capspace.
I wouldn't extend him now. He was struggling before he got injured so see how he does when he comes back. Also, we might need to just let him go during the offseason for capspace.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
shangrila wrote:It would force Adelman to play Williams at the 3 more, so he might develop a little faster.
It's more likely that Wes Johnson and Anthony Tolliver would play more, which isn't a good thing.

Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 882
- Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
I'm fine with extending him then trading him in the offseason if he doesn't fit in.
I'm also fine with waiting and giving him the QO.
Either way is better than letting him walk. He has value whether you personally like him or not, and we shouldn't waste the asset.
I'm also fine with waiting and giving him the QO.
Either way is better than letting him walk. He has value whether you personally like him or not, and we shouldn't waste the asset.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 287
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 10, 2011
- Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
AQuintus wrote:Effigy wrote:Minny should trade him for a position of need. He's not a bad player, but they just drafted Derek Williams who needs his minutes. I'm not convinced Derek Williams will be better than SupercoolBeaz, but you should at least find out.
Derrick Williams = PF
Michael Beasley = SF
Trading away Beasley does absolutely nothing to help Williams' minutes.
I don't understand the rational to trade away a better player just to see if the lesser player develops. And Williams has started the last two games at the 3, and hasn't sucked. Both he and Beas are PFs that need to learn how to play SF if they want to be successful in this league.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,737
- And1: 328
- Joined: Jan 02, 2009
- Location: Northern Minnesota
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
When do we need to decide if we're giving him the QO? (edit June 30)
I wouldn't have offered him an extension right now. He is way too often a negative value to the Wolves on the court. A negative value on the court isn't someone you want locked into any amount of salary for multiple years. With an $8.2 mil QO, that is somewhat questionable as well - even if it is just one year.
Sure he's young and has a lot of potential, but if he can't show some consistancy and team game skills before we need to offer him the QO, we are probably better off trading him or letting him walk.
I wouldn't have offered him an extension right now. He is way too often a negative value to the Wolves on the court. A negative value on the court isn't someone you want locked into any amount of salary for multiple years. With an $8.2 mil QO, that is somewhat questionable as well - even if it is just one year.
Sure he's young and has a lot of potential, but if he can't show some consistancy and team game skills before we need to offer him the QO, we are probably better off trading him or letting him walk.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,731
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
mark blunt wrote:Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging.
Besides the Love extension this is what I took out of yesterday. Now I don't think we'll be able to sign him as a RFA because NO will simply match (if we can even muster up the cap space). They are not going to lose him and get nothing in return. However, given Gordon's injury history and the fact the NBA still owns the Hornets, they might not be willing to pay the 4yr 58m deal he's going to receive from another team this offseason and instead of putting themselves in the situation of matching or losing him, they could be willing to make a deal at this year's trade deadline.
Some combo of Williams/Besley for Ariza/Gordon is a very nice initial offer or make it bigger and include Okafor and Darko plus fillers if NO wants to save money.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,196
- And1: 14
- Joined: Jun 02, 2010
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Rest assured that the first thing Kahn does in FA is to hand an offersheet to Batum.
Might make a play for Wallace as well.
Might make a play for Wallace as well.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,295
- And1: 19,306
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
jpatrick wrote:mark blunt wrote:Gordon hitting RFA is definitely encouraging.
Besides the Love extension this is what I took out of yesterday. Now I don't think we'll be able to sign him as a RFA because NO will simply match (if we can even muster up the cap space). They are not going to lose him and get nothing in return. However, given Gordon's injury history and the fact the NBA still owns the Hornets, they might not be willing to pay the 4yr 58m deal he's going to receive from another team this offseason and instead of putting themselves in the situation of matching or losing him, they could be willing to make a deal at this year's trade deadline.
Some combo of Williams/Besley for Ariza/Gordon is a very nice initial offer or make it bigger and include Okafor and Darko plus fillers if NO wants to save money.
By not giving Eric Gordon an extension, he would be easier for NOH to trade, because he doesn't pick up the Poison Pill Provision. That would make his salary the average of this year and all the extended years, which makes it difficult to salary match.
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,520
- And1: 52
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
The Pistons might be interested in Beasley...Don't be surprised if Dumars makes a phone call to Kahn...
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 9
- Joined: Aug 03, 2010
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
Jodi wrote:The Pistons might be interested in Beasley...Don't be surprised if Dumars makes a phone call to Kahn...
Dumars: "Is this David Kahn?"
Kahn: "This is."
Dumars: "What do you want for Michael Beasley? We can offer you Charlie Villanueva or Jason Maxiell."
Kahn: "I know who Maxiell is, but who is this Villanueva guy?"
Dumars: "You'd love him, he's long and relatively athletic. We owe him 24M over the next 3 years, but he average 11 a night for us last year. Oh, and get this, he's played a total of 6 minutes this season in two games so his legs are going to be really fresh!"
Kahn: "How about you keep Maxiell and Vallanueva and give us a top-5 protected first instead?"
......dial tone.......
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,520
- And1: 52
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Re: Would you Extend Beasley Today ..?
@Fire Mchale: Remember my last statement and your cute little skit...Lets talk again after the trade deadline...
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves