ImageImage

OT: Super Bowl XXXII

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#1 » by Wilford Brimley » Thu Feb 9, 2012 9:00 pm

For a long time I have wondered how/why we lost this game.

I recently got a copy of the game in its entirety, and am going to go back and watch it this weekend. I like going back and watching old games to see how/why we lost/won. It gives me a better sense of X's and O's/momentum/turning points etc, that I'm not able to see watching it just once.

Anything I should look for specifically?

Should I post what I find - would anyone care?
Captain Erv
General Manager
Posts: 8,119
And1: 78
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#2 » by Captain Erv » Thu Feb 9, 2012 9:53 pm

All I remember about that game is crying my eyes out and smashing a plastic watch.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#3 » by Newz » Thu Feb 9, 2012 9:57 pm

Captain Erv wrote:All I remember about that game is crying my eyes out and smashing a plastic watch.


Image
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,701
And1: 460
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#4 » by Reddeye » Thu Feb 9, 2012 10:09 pm

From what I remember the Packers lost this game because they couldn't stop Denver from from running the ball. Gabe Wilkins tweaked his knee and wouldn't go back into the game even though other Packer players were begging him. Darius Holland was brutal at DE and Denver ran it down Green Bay's throat. Coincidentally Wilkins was a free agent after the season.

If only Sean Jones wouldn't have hurt his back in the off season he might have returned for the 1997 season instead of retiring. Jones wasn't that much of a pass rusher anymore, but he was very good against the run.
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#5 » by Wilford Brimley » Thu Feb 9, 2012 11:31 pm

Wilkins didn't go back in the game for fear of hurting his impending FA stock.

I also heard Holmy refused to go max protect to guard against Denver's blitzes.

I'll probably watch it tonight, I'm really curious. I have a lot better knowledge of football now, as opposed to just a few years ago even, let alone since 1998.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,470
And1: 11,482
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#6 » by Turk Nowitzki » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:06 am

I'm still bitter about this, we should've won this game. Thanks for bringing it up WB.
an_also
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2008

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#7 » by an_also » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:13 am

I thought the game was going to be a blowout after the Freeman TD catch...
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#8 » by Wilford Brimley » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:32 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:I'm still bitter about this, we should've won this game. Thanks for bringing it up WB.


Image
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,633
And1: 13,721
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#9 » by th87 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:33 pm

Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,558
And1: 8,293
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#10 » by Profound23 » Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:39 am

All I know is Dorsey Levens admitted that Holmgren was doing everything he could to make sure Favre got the MVP even if it meant abandoning the run which was working.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#11 » by humanrefutation » Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:00 am

Profound23 wrote:All I know is Dorsey Levens admitted that Holmgren was doing everything he could to make sure Favre got the MVP even if it meant abandoning the run which was working.


I don't think it was about Favre getting MVP. I think it was Holmgren being too pompous and stubborn to admit that his gameplan has weaknesses that required more guys to stay back in protection.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,619
And1: 1,271
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#12 » by Thunder Muscle » Fri Mar 2, 2012 3:21 am

And there is the rumor that Favre, Chewy, and the Amigos were out in the gas lamp district til 4am.
User avatar
ClassicJack
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,805
And1: 968
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
     

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#13 » by ClassicJack » Fri Mar 2, 2012 4:39 am

N8Frog wrote:And there is the rumor that Favre, Chewy, and the Amigos were out in the gas lamp district til 4am.


I don't think that is a rumor anymore. Chuey pretty much confirmed that one on his radio show this season.
F*** Marc Davis, f*** Tim Donaghy and f*** David Stern as a staff, record label and as a mothaf**kin crew......and if you wanna be down with Stern then F*** YOU TOO!!! Stu Jackson f*** you too.....all you mothaf**kas F*** YOU TOO!!!!
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,414
And1: 8,026
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: OT: Super Bowl XXXII 

Post#14 » by Mags FTW » Fri Mar 2, 2012 4:57 am

More than one Packer on that team admitted that they took the Broncos too lightly and thought the game was going to be a cakewalk.

Return to Green Bay Packers