Official Speculation Thread (Pt XII, Mods Close)

arsenal6106 · Post #521 » by **arsenal6106** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:56 am

magicman123 wrote:gortat, anderson, jameer, redick for chris paul

I would do this in a heartbeat. However, we will be short on big men after that trade. I have faith in Otis to sign a back up center though.

The Real Dalic · Post #522 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:00 am

PeePee la Fritz wrote:
The Real Dalic wrote:I agree. he probably wouldn't make us a lot better, but, if we can get him for the price we could possibly flip him for Ellis in some kind of package. another guy I think could be a somewhat realistic option is Rudy Gay. I would love to have him here. I'd prefer Ellis, but, Gay is pretty amazing.

So what you are saying is starting Danny Granger over Hedo will not make Orlando much better.......ummmmmm

No. I'd gladly take Granger even if that was our only move. and yes, it would be a major upgrade over Hedo (anyone would), but, I don't think it would be enough to convince Dwight to stay and I don't think it makes us contenders unless we get Nash with him. which I don't see happening. But, if we could get Granger somehow and lets say we keep Anderson and J-Rich, we could possibly acquire Ellis and maybe even Dorell Wright too... obviously we would have to take back Biedrins too... which I don't mind since we need a backup C.

The Real Dalic · Post #523 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:01 am

arkknight1988 wrote:^ granger would make us much better but we would still have a pg and an aging sg problem. maybe even a pf problem if we trade anderson for him. This team is like a sinking ship, once we plug one hole 2 more open up.

So true.

The Real Dalic · Post #524 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:02 am

arsenal6106 wrote:
magicman123 wrote:gortat, anderson, jameer, redick for chris paul

I would do this in a heartbeat. However, we will be short on big men after that trade. I have faith in Otis to sign a back up center though.

This. Git R Done Otis!

arkknight1988 · Post #525 » by **arkknight1988** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:02 am

These don't even look like the shooting guards we signed LOL
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kxd3xyiGtI&feature=related[/youtube]

InFlames · Post #526 » by **InFlames** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:04 am

I want Ellis.

arkknight1988 · Post #527 » by **arkknight1988** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:05 am

InFlames wrote:I want Ellis.

gs wants howard

The Real Dalic · Post #528 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:06 am

arkknight1988 wrote:
InFlames wrote:I want Ellis.

gs wants howard

So we can both get what we wanted if we traded Howard for Ellis, problem solved.

mityamag · Post #529 » by **mityamag** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:07 am

I think Granger and Nash are real possibilities to aquire

InFlames · Post #530 » by **InFlames** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:07 am

arkknight1988 wrote:
InFlames wrote:I want Ellis.

gs wants howard

But I want Howard too.

magicman123 · Post #531 » by **magicman123** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:08 am

arkknight1988 wrote:
InFlames wrote:I want Ellis.

gs wants howard

gs wants to get rid of the headache in ellis, howard has no desire to play in GS

arkknight1988 · Post #532 » by **arkknight1988** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:15 am

mityamag wrote:I think Granger and Nash are real possibilities to aquire

not sure how we get both. we have to get creative to bring 1 in.

Nolimit1211 · Post #533 » by **Nolimit1211** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:16 am

Indiana is THIRD in the East, Why the *&$# would they give us Granger?!

This board is hilarious.

The Real Dalic · Post #534 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:21 am

Nolimit1211 wrote:Indiana is THIRD in the East, Why the *&$# would they give us Granger?!

This board is hilarious.

We're 4th in the East (in losses) and we wanna give everybody up... except for Dwight and Liggins of course. especially Liggins, who you'd figure we're gonna build the team around once Dwight retires.

EasternMagic · Post #535 » by **EasternMagic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:21 am

thelead wrote:the ONE time...

Technically the Vince/Ryno trade worked out for us too.. especially if Ryno keeps getting better.

Nolimit1211 · Post #536 » by **Nolimit1211** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:29 am

The Real Dalic wrote:
Nolimit1211 wrote:Indiana is THIRD in the East, Why the *&$# would they give us Granger?!

This board is hilarious.

We're 4th in the East (in losses) and we wanna give everybody up... except for Dwight and Liggins of course. especially Liggins, who you'd figure we're gonna build the team around once Dwight retires.

Lol. Seriously though, this board will always find a way to persuade themselves that another team needs to give up their best player for our role players (CP3/Iggy/Granger/Monta)... It's ridiculous.

Post these ABSURD trades on the General Board Trade Thread and you'll get burned so bad by every poster from this site.

Davidm89 · Post #537 » by **Davidm89** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:41 am

I think Nash is a real possibility (Unless I've missed something in the last few days I've been away) any news on that?

The1llness · Post #538 » by **The1llness** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:03 am

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
The1llness wrote:
Yea, he can be the official spokesman of Juniors cheesecakes right up Flatbush Ave.

Being from Greenpoint Brooklyn, living there and frequently visiting...WTF is in Brooklyn?!?! That team is going to be the equivalent of what the Clippers have been for the last few years.

Yea I'm from Brooklyn myself and I can tell Sam Amick has never been here. Barclay's Center and Atlantic Yards is a nice project, and that part of BK is developing nicely but there isn't a single business withing a 2 mile radius of the arena that is going to propel Dwight into international super-stardom. I don't even think there's a single Fortune 500 company in the borough. It's a glorified suburb.

Now there will be plenty of marketing opportunities for him across the bridge, but the Nets have (foolishly) adopted the Brooklyn moniker and are carving out a niche market for themselves as opposed to calling themselves the New York Nets and gobbling up the entire NY demographic. It's just screams B-Team.

I think the better comparison for what the Nets will be is the Anaheim Angels.

Reverse_Angle · Post #539 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:07 am

Nolimit1211 wrote:
The Real Dalic wrote:
Nolimit1211 wrote:Indiana is THIRD in the East, Why the *&$# would they give us Granger?!

This board is hilarious.

We're 4th in the East (in losses) and we wanna give everybody up... except for Dwight and Liggins of course. especially Liggins, who you'd figure we're gonna build the team around once Dwight retires.

Lol. Seriously though, this board will always find a way to persuade themselves that another team needs to give up their best player for our role players (CP3/Iggy/Granger/Monta)... It's ridiculous.

Post these ABSURD trades on the General Board Trade Thread and you'll get burned so bad by every poster from this site.

who cares about the fans perspective. fans know ****. stop keep pointing it to the fans everytime you think something is not pssible, which is every damn time.

all you do is telling people how ridiculous their ideas are, yet contribute nothing. a big zero. i am not sure why you post here.

i want you to explain why Rockets wanted Gasol.

arkknight1988 · Post #540 » by **arkknight1988** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:16 am

i remember when we were cheering for dallas to beat miami and maybe dwight would see that staying with ur team pays off. Instead we get dallas on his "trade list." ok dwight :roll: