arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
yep they need to trade ellis, start the team around curry, lee, and thompson
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird
arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
blue and white wrote:What do you guys think of lou williams? sixers have stop playing him for some reason and i think his style of game would be perfect for us as our back up pg. hes fast shoots the 3 and most importantly not duhon. I need help finding a good trade but i think he could easily be had and would make a world of difference for our second unit. maybe something like this and a second round pick going to philly http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=88r2zvk
arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
magicman123 wrote:blue and white wrote:What do you guys think of lou williams? sixers have stop playing him for some reason and i think his style of game would be perfect for us as our back up pg. hes fast shoots the 3 and most importantly not duhon. I need help finding a good trade but i think he could easily be had and would make a world of difference for our second unit. maybe something like this and a second round pick going to philly http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=88r2zvk
i hope thats a joke
NW wrote:arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
It's definitely possible - if you get something good for Ellis. Like I said, I don't think anyone in the organization is against trading Ellis, but not for a role player package of talent that you could get similar in free agency and small trades. Giving up a core starting player, get one in a position of need back.
NW wrote:arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
It's definitely possible - if you get something good for Ellis. Like I said, I don't think anyone in the organization is against trading Ellis, but not for a role player package of talent that you could get similar in free agency and small trades. Giving up a core starting player, get one in a position of need back.
magicman123 wrote:NW wrote:arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
It's definitely possible - if you get something good for Ellis. Like I said, I don't think anyone in the organization is against trading Ellis, but not for a role player package of talent that you could get similar in free agency and small trades. Giving up a core starting player, get one in a position of need back.
anderson and lee front court, curry and thompson back court
curry
jrich
thompson
anderson
lee
maybe you want jrich and play thompson at the 3?
NW wrote:
That frontcourt is a defensive quagmire
The Real Dalic wrote:NW wrote:arkknight1988 wrote:i think klay thompson should start at sg next year for the warriors. him and curry can really grow together
It's definitely possible - if you get something good for Ellis. Like I said, I don't think anyone in the organization is against trading Ellis, but not for a role player package of talent that you could get similar in free agency and small trades. Giving up a core starting player, get one in a position of need back.
I know your owner is not willing to rebuild yet, but, the problem I have with this is there's no point to bring in a star player in the position the Warriors are in.
magicman123 wrote:NW wrote:
That frontcourt is a defensive quagmire
you dont play defense anyways so, you got two of the best rebounders in the league, the best big man shooter in the league, they're both white, can score in bunches, 2 white guys, that could be a playoff team
NW wrote:lol. Defense is better this year actually. As much as you can improve without a defensive anchor at center.
magicman123 wrote:NW wrote:lol. Defense is better this year actually. As much as you can improve without a defensive anchor at center.
foreal though, as a warriors fan what kind of value do you think ellis has? or what would you consider a respectable trade? doesnt have to be with the magic
arkknight1988 wrote:magicman123 wrote:NW wrote:lol. Defense is better this year actually. As much as you can improve without a defensive anchor at center.
foreal though, as a warriors fan what kind of value do you think ellis has? or what would you consider a respectable trade? doesnt have to be with the magic
he has an unrealistic value of ellis. (deng iggy gay bogut)
arkknight1988 wrote:gasol is going off on the warriors
thelead wrote:I've accepted that we're going to do nothing, let Dwight walk, and then overpay the next non allstar. I should start a new hashtag #OTISWINNING
magicman123 wrote:would you take any package from orlando (except dwight)
NW wrote:magicman123 wrote:would you take any package from orlando (except dwight)
Doubt it. You're best pieces pretty much match what GS already has. Anderson is similar to Lee. The Warriors are loaded at the SG spot so guys like JRich and Reddick aren't needed.
Best thing of value you guys got are draft picks - and that's contingent on Howard leaving which defeats the purpose of making a trade.