MagicFan41 wrote:
There's an entire field of study of body language, don't be stupid about this. Did I say "omg, he is 100% gone!!!" based on that video? No, but things can be inferred, in context of situations, in conjunction with things that have been said/done by certain parties. You're one of those people who take everything at literal face-value aren't you? Nothing can ever be deduced, inferred, calculated without 100% knowledge? I never said for sure he was or wasn't leaving based on the video. I agreed that "it doesn't look good" based on body language and actions within the context of the whole situation. I was at the game, feet from the tunnel. I saw the look on Dwight's face, I saw his shoulders, I saw him walking away. You're probably right though...he was probably just really genuinely sad that we won the game. You're hilarious.
You're being belligerent. Where did I say he was sad because he lost the game? I didn't. I'm not saying that nothing can be inferred or deduced without knowledge, I am saying that plenty people are taking whatever scraps of "evidence" that support the decision
they have already made about Dwight's situation and using it. What would you have said if he had left the court beaming and hugged Martins, "Things looking good, I think he'll stay"?
Re: his departure from the court, who's to say he wasn't just pissed at himself about all the free throws he missed late on that should have closed out the game? Who's to say a fan didn't say something to him as he left the floor which upset him? It's easy to make up scenarios that support what you want them to support. You may or may not be correct.
So much has gone on in the last few months, most of it behind closed doors, with the only windows into such goings on being anonymous "sources", and yet so many assumptions are still being made based on the back of basically nothing.
