ImageImageImage

MN/Portland

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

MN/Portland 

Post#1 » by Dewey » Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:42 pm

Why not skip the Lakers and just swap some spit with Portland ... If Ridnour is rumored in any deals (after Rube injury), I gotta hunch it's got it;s own motives. Portland wants potential cap space.

Incoming Players
Michael Beasley
Brad Miller
Luke Ridnour

Outgoing Players
Raymond Felton
Jamal Crawford
Nicolas Batum


Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... z1pByrhsF0
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#2 » by C.lupus » Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:48 pm

They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
WetWildandWeird
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 18, 2012

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#3 » by WetWildandWeird » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:08 pm

C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.


Well there is a chance it just involves chloroform and/or blackmail
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#4 » by Esohny » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:08 pm

C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.


Agreed.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#5 » by Dewey » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:17 pm

C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.


I agree they may not likely do it, but I don't think they are plotting to "make space for signing Batum".
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,312
And1: 8,040
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#6 » by Wizenheimer » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:45 pm

Dewey wrote:
C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.


I agree they may not likely do it, but I don't think they are plotting to "make space for signing Batum".


the Blazers have every intention of re-signing Batum. of course, they haven't seen what offers he gets yet

But the important thing to keep in mind is that Portland wants cap-space this summer and Batum's 5 million dollar cap-hold as a RFA will be significantly less then what his new salary will be. So it made sense not to extend his rookie deal this season

your trade is a non-starter for the Blazers. They'd have little interest in Beasley, and no interest at all in trading Batum.

As far as the rumored deal, as a Blazer fan, I'm betting (hoping) that if the Lakers continue to insist on Portland taking Blake, the deal is DOA
User avatar
abrewbro68
Sophomore
Posts: 226
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 16, 2010

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#7 » by abrewbro68 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:56 pm

Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#8 » by Krapinsky » Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:07 pm

abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?


They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
abrewbro68
Sophomore
Posts: 226
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 16, 2010

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#9 » by abrewbro68 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:16 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?


They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.



They have space to do that, Batum is a RFA.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,524
And1: 4,983
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#10 » by theGreatRC » Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:13 pm

abrewbro68 wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?


They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.



They have space to do that, Batum is a RFA.


Just because you're a RFA, doesn't mean it doesn't count on the cap. Only good thing about RFA is that you can match any offer a team makes to them or offer them a good contract even if you didn't have a lot of cap room. (If the owner is willing to pay luxury tax.)
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
ritt0093
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#11 » by ritt0093 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:23 pm

The only problem with RFA is that you must match an offer within a certain window. So if a team offers Batum a contract (and he accpets) on day 1 of free agency, the Blazers would have 3 days to match. If they match he would then count against their cap at the new rate. So their "extra" cap space only exists as long as Batum is unsigned + 3 days.

I think...
User avatar
abrewbro68
Sophomore
Posts: 226
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 16, 2010

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#12 » by abrewbro68 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:24 pm

[/quote]

Just because you're a RFA, doesn't mean it doesn't count on the cap. Only good thing about RFA is that you can match any offer a team makes to them or offer them a good contract even if you didn't have a lot of cap room. (If the owner is willing to pay luxury tax.)[/quote]


Of course it counts against the cap space. But the Blazers have his rights. They don't need to clear space to resign their own players when they have his rights.
User avatar
abrewbro68
Sophomore
Posts: 226
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 16, 2010

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#13 » by abrewbro68 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:30 pm

ritt0093 wrote:The only problem with RFA is that you must match an offer within a certain window. So if a team offers Batum a contract (and he accpets) on day 1 of free agency, the Blazers would have 3 days to match. If they match he would then count against their cap at the new rate. So their "extra" cap space only exists as long as Batum is unsigned + 3 days.

I think...



The extra cap space only becomes actual cap space if you waive Batums rights, but then at the same time you could not sign him to a contract that could potentially put you over the cap.
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 15,619
And1: 3,515
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: MN/Portland 

Post#14 » by Shem » Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:04 am

Giving up Batum and taking in Beasley were the killers of that trade idea.
April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves