MN/Portland
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
MN/Portland
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 1,070
- Joined: May 22, 2001
MN/Portland
Why not skip the Lakers and just swap some spit with Portland ... If Ridnour is rumored in any deals (after Rube injury), I gotta hunch it's got it;s own motives. Portland wants potential cap space.
Incoming Players
Michael Beasley
Brad Miller
Luke Ridnour
Outgoing Players
Raymond Felton
Jamal Crawford
Nicolas Batum
Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... z1pByrhsF0
Incoming Players
Michael Beasley
Brad Miller
Luke Ridnour
Outgoing Players
Raymond Felton
Jamal Crawford
Nicolas Batum
Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... z1pByrhsF0
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: MN/Portland
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: MN/Portland
They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
Re: MN/Portland
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 42
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
Re: MN/Portland
C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
Well there is a chance it just involves chloroform and/or blackmail
Re: MN/Portland
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: MN/Portland
C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
Agreed.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: MN/Portland
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 1,070
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: MN/Portland
C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
I agree they may not likely do it, but I don't think they are plotting to "make space for signing Batum".
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: MN/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,310
- And1: 8,039
- Joined: May 28, 2007
Re: MN/Portland
Dewey wrote:C.lupus wrote:They want potential cap space to re-sign Batum. No chance they do this.
I agree they may not likely do it, but I don't think they are plotting to "make space for signing Batum".
the Blazers have every intention of re-signing Batum. of course, they haven't seen what offers he gets yet
But the important thing to keep in mind is that Portland wants cap-space this summer and Batum's 5 million dollar cap-hold as a RFA will be significantly less then what his new salary will be. So it made sense not to extend his rookie deal this season
your trade is a non-starter for the Blazers. They'd have little interest in Beasley, and no interest at all in trading Batum.
As far as the rumored deal, as a Blazer fan, I'm betting (hoping) that if the Lakers continue to insist on Portland taking Blake, the deal is DOA
Re: MN/Portland
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: MN/Portland
Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?
Re: MN/Portland
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: MN/Portland
abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?
They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: MN/Portland
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: MN/Portland
Krapinsky wrote:abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?
They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.
They have space to do that, Batum is a RFA.
Re: MN/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,524
- And1: 4,983
- Joined: Oct 12, 2006
- Location: California
-
Re: MN/Portland
abrewbro68 wrote:Krapinsky wrote:abrewbro68 wrote:Why would the Blazers need cap space, to resign their own player?
They'll also need to find a starting point and starting center.
They have space to do that, Batum is a RFA.
Just because you're a RFA, doesn't mean it doesn't count on the cap. Only good thing about RFA is that you can match any offer a team makes to them or offer them a good contract even if you didn't have a lot of cap room. (If the owner is willing to pay luxury tax.)
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Re: MN/Portland
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 156
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 25, 2007
Re: MN/Portland
The only problem with RFA is that you must match an offer within a certain window. So if a team offers Batum a contract (and he accpets) on day 1 of free agency, the Blazers would have 3 days to match. If they match he would then count against their cap at the new rate. So their "extra" cap space only exists as long as Batum is unsigned + 3 days.
I think...
I think...
Re: MN/Portland
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: MN/Portland
[/quote]
Just because you're a RFA, doesn't mean it doesn't count on the cap. Only good thing about RFA is that you can match any offer a team makes to them or offer them a good contract even if you didn't have a lot of cap room. (If the owner is willing to pay luxury tax.)[/quote]
Of course it counts against the cap space. But the Blazers have his rights. They don't need to clear space to resign their own players when they have his rights.
Just because you're a RFA, doesn't mean it doesn't count on the cap. Only good thing about RFA is that you can match any offer a team makes to them or offer them a good contract even if you didn't have a lot of cap room. (If the owner is willing to pay luxury tax.)[/quote]
Of course it counts against the cap space. But the Blazers have his rights. They don't need to clear space to resign their own players when they have his rights.
Re: MN/Portland
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: MN/Portland
ritt0093 wrote:The only problem with RFA is that you must match an offer within a certain window. So if a team offers Batum a contract (and he accpets) on day 1 of free agency, the Blazers would have 3 days to match. If they match he would then count against their cap at the new rate. So their "extra" cap space only exists as long as Batum is unsigned + 3 days.
I think...
The extra cap space only becomes actual cap space if you waive Batums rights, but then at the same time you could not sign him to a contract that could potentially put you over the cap.
Re: MN/Portland
- Shem
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,619
- And1: 3,515
- Joined: Dec 15, 2009
-
Re: MN/Portland
Giving up Batum and taking in Beasley were the killers of that trade idea.
April 4, 2014:
Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland
Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves