BelgianMagic wrote:IGotDaMagicInMe wrote:How much better would we be if we waived orton, signed turiaf and used ish instead of duhon?
These 2 small moves alone would make us a lot better ..
Duhon is costing us GAMES, not only points or possessions ..
And Turiaf would be a real, servicable backup C. As in, not a PF out of position
Again, even these 2 small moves are VERY realistic, but as usual too good to be true knowing we have Otis Smith as GM
What does that even mean? Otis Smith drops dime to improve the team all the time, he's shown that.
I agree about the waiving Orton for Turiaf though, Anytime you drop a player that gets 0 mins for a player that can contribute now is an upgrade. Is there a need, *shrug* Turiaf wouldn't have helped last night. How many mins would a back up center realistically get behind Dwight anyway. I wouldnt add anymore contracts this year if I were Otis. I think its a good move
Although I dislike Duhon nobody has seen Ish in a larger role he could be worse than Duhon at somethings (Defense, Scoring, Running the offense) It's easy to see these small sample sizes where he plays better than Duhon but that doesnt mean he'd be better in the big picture. Right now he doesnt really run complicated plays. His first game he got big mins (cant remember who that was against) he would bring the ball up and hand it off, otherwise he was playing street ball so to speak and improvising. I think in certain games he should play and Im not saying he wont learn Stans offense just saying right now as a full time back up he may not be as good as people think.