Post#257 » by Neon1 » Tue May 15, 2012 12:53 am
[quote="Nemesis21]
This is about Jones, taken form the link CB provided.
Magic Outlook: Listen. This is my problem with the Magic drafting Terrence Jones: He is Earl Clark. You can read the pre-draft breakdowns of the two players and it is practically copy/paste. Jones: Tweener forward Clark: Tweener forward, Jones: 6'9" Clark: 6'10.5", Jones: 7'2" wingspan Clark: 7'2.5" wingspan, college 3pt% Jones: 32.7% Clark: 32.6%. It's ridiculous. Points, rebounds, all the same. So drafting Jones is basically drafting Baby Clark in the hopes that this version is better able to develop a jumpshot. It doesn't sound worth using the 19th pick to run that experiment to me.[/quote]
I read it, i just don't completely agree.
I wouldnt take him over one of the top PG's or SG's if they were available, but i don't feel like he would not be a "bad" pick. I would definately take him over a guy like Mo Harkless (i know many are high on him) who i really see as a more raw Hakim Warrick. I just don't see Harkless as a guy that will ever be a go to scorer type, which is what i think most people here are hoping he is/would be for us. He just doesn't have the game to create anything imo. I don't think Jones will either mind you, but Jones can at least be a good Marvin Williams type of PF/SF. Harkless imo will forever be stuck between SF/PF while not being good enough to play either one very well.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kegKtgRMEjI[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlfAKwOOA_w[/youtube]
A smart coach once said, "Potential just means you're not good enough yet." Playing on potential is like living on air: It's essential, but if thats all you have, you're eventually going to starve.
Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah