dobrojim wrote:I've no idea who the next coach will be. I wonder if the Pop asst coach Buden...
will be the guy. I wonder what their time frame is.
Hopefully he won't be available until late June, right after they hoist the trophy. (ABM, baby!)
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
dobrojim wrote:I've no idea who the next coach will be. I wonder if the Pop asst coach Buden...
will be the guy. I wonder what their time frame is.
hermitkid wrote:Exploded with increased popularity? Exactly what the Wizards needed to get better, nevermind that while their popularity "exploded" their production stayed remarkably similar to what they were doing on a team where they essentially had free reign.
Sorry if I'm not drinking the koolaide on how those guys are so much better off now that they're no longer being subjected to this teams relentless effort to discredit their contributions.
Smh.
Let's get something out of the way here, the Wizards were counting on both of those guys to be potential franchise building blocks. The suggestion that they were mishandled is absurd. Both were looking to get paid like professionals, it's too bad that they didn't think it was necessary to conduct themselves like ones.
Young, $9 million a year, is that fact lost on anybody? He'll be lucky to get the full MLE after this season is over and the Nuggets may be gushing and awing over McGee's potential now, but let's see where they stand when McGee signs his +$10 million per anum deal and still has to be hidden on the bench as to not expose his absurd defensive deficiencies.
If there's one thing you can fault the Wizards for it's saddling those youngin's with too many expectations. Making a playoff run, anybody else remember that offseason nonsense?
Young and McGee in particular, had every opportunity to succeed, and they both failed miserably.
Severn Hoos wrote:dobrojim wrote:I've no idea who the next coach will be. I wonder if the Pop asst coach Buden...
will be the guy. I wonder what their time frame is.
Hopefully he won't be available until late June, right after they hoist the trophy. (ABM, baby!)
closg00 wrote:Do we really want to bring the NBA's most disliked coach ( by players) to the Wizards?
closg00 wrote:Do we really want to bring the NBA's most disliked coach ( by players) to the Wizards?
closg00 wrote:Do we really want to bring the NBA's most disliked coach ( by players) to the Wizards?
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
hands11 wrote:closg00 wrote:Do we really want to bring the NBA's most disliked coach ( by players) to the Wizards?
No
Actually, hell no.
I want no part of that whining Smerf. He would be a terrible choice for this team.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.

TGW wrote:hands11 wrote:closg00 wrote:Do we really want to bring the NBA's most disliked coach ( by players) to the Wizards?
No
Actually, hell no.
I want no part of that whining Smerf. He would be a terrible choice for this team.
Well of course you wouldn't want him. Anyone who would actually hold Andray Flatche accountable is probably someone you would want no part of.
hands11 wrote:
That has to be the stupidest thing have I read on the board in a long long time. I was the one who said I hope they sit him as an inactive player until he gets in shape. With interesting enough is what they actually did. I don't think many saw that coming.
That happened under Whitman who I would like to see return for a one year audition.
He gets it and he is already working hard to get back in shape.
I think we will finally see it. He did actually do it once in his 7DD summer. I say he does it again. He got beaten up pretty bad. The message got through. You will visible see a difference before to long.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
miller31time wrote:Stan Van gets results, plain and simple. With the right group of players, he'd be an excellent coach, long-term. And from the roster we've put together (high character, strong work ethic, willing and able to learn), he would appear to be a great fit.
pancakes3 is spot on -- the question isn't whether we would want to sign him. It's whether he would want to sign with us.

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract
Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.