Draft Combine discussion thread

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#241 » by 7-Day Dray » Fri Jun 8, 2012 9:41 pm

Mac1Money wrote:measurements are soo overrated it rediculous

These kids clearly can play basketball, thats why they;re in the position that they're in..

If they "dominated" in college with these same measurements...I dont see them being too much of a major factor in the NBA


+1000 I don't know how so many people can ignore their play on the court and just go by combine numbers to indicate if they're a player or not.
dballislife
RealGM
Posts: 14,387
And1: 5,467
Joined: Jan 24, 2010

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#242 » by dballislife » Fri Jun 8, 2012 9:50 pm

size, length, and athleticism matter a lot in basketball
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 26,791
And1: 55,507
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#243 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:14 pm

7-Day Dray wrote:
Mac1Money wrote:measurements are soo overrated it rediculous

These kids clearly can play basketball, thats why they;re in the position that they're in..

If they "dominated" in college with these same measurements...I dont see them being too much of a major factor in the NBA


+1000 I don't know how so many people can ignore their play on the court and just go by combine numbers to indicate if they're a player or not.


Because sometimes the measurements tell you that some guys just won't cut it a the next level.

Michael Beasley is a glaring example of this, had people just gone by his college dominance he would have been the number 1 pick. He was physically dominating at PF in college, got to the next level and had to make the change to SF because he was only 6"8 (listed @ 6"10) and not particularly long.

If you redid that draft McGee, Lopez and Hibbert all should have gone before him, but too many questions about motor for Lopez, how raw McGee was, or how unathletic Hibbert was meant you couldn't draft them over him. All of those guys were longer, taller and better prospects at the next level because of their measurements. Imagine how much better Miami would be if they picked any of those 3 guys regardless of the questions...
hype_2004
RealGM
Posts: 12,572
And1: 4,868
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: T.O

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#244 » by hype_2004 » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:15 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:
nhh90 wrote:Drummond is second. I don't know how you don't take those measurements second


This. Plus most 270 lb guys are lucky to have a 30' vertical, and Drummond has a 38 :o


Thus kid will be a monster imagine being 300 lbs with speed, agility and vertical of a SF, if this doesn't warrant consideration for the no.1 pick then I don't know what is.
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#245 » by 7-Day Dray » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:27 pm

hype_2004 wrote:
MalonesElbows wrote:
nhh90 wrote:Drummond is second. I don't know how you don't take those measurements second


This. Plus most 270 lb guys are lucky to have a 30' vertical, and Drummond has a 38 :o


Thus kid will be a monster imagine being 300 lbs with speed, agility and vertical of a SF, if this doesn't warrant consideration for the no.1 pick then I don't know what is.


Drummond does have a very wide body but didn't get much above average on standing reach, which is equally important for centers. Cousins, for instance, has 4 inches on him there. Drummond also has very small hands which is crucial for easily catching entry passes and posting up. They aren't Kwame Brown small, but they are small. Overall the measurements were neutral for Drummond in regards to expectations. I do suspect he will kill on the vertical tests though.
User avatar
Roger Murdock
RealGM
Posts: 12,458
And1: 5,792
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
 

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#246 » by Roger Murdock » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:38 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:Am I the only one surprised at Davis' reach "only" being 9'0. One inch higher than Sullinger and below Quincy??? This guy?

Image



They don't fully extend because they want to make their vertical leaps more impressive. He can probably reach 1 or 2 more inches if he really strained himself.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 26,791
And1: 55,507
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#247 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:39 pm

7-Day Dray wrote:
Drummond does have a very wide body but didn't get much above average on standing reach, which is equally important for centers. Cousins, for instance, has 4 inches on him there. Drummond also has very small hands which is crucial for easily catching entry passes and posting up. They aren't Kwame Brown small, but they are small. Overall the measurements were neutral for Drummond in regards to expectations. I do suspect he will kill on the vertical tests though.



His hands aren't small, they were bigger than Anthony Davis' hands and among the top 10 at the combine.

Also, he has a 9"1 and a half standing reach and a 38" vert, puts his reach at 12"2 and 3 quarters, for comparison Dwight and JaVale were 12"3 (Cousins 11"8). He also said he's hit 41" before in vert, which doesn't seem like a big stretch.
bigboi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,645
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 05, 2010

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#248 » by bigboi » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:46 pm

Pops wrote:
7-Day Dray wrote:
Drummond does have a very wide body but didn't get much above average on standing reach, which is equally important for centers. Cousins, for instance, has 4 inches on him there. Drummond also has very small hands which is crucial for easily catching entry passes and posting up. They aren't Kwame Brown small, but they are small. Overall the measurements were neutral for Drummond in regards to expectations. I do suspect he will kill on the vertical tests though.



His hands aren't small, they were bigger than Anthony Davis' hands and among the top 10 at the combine.

Also, he has a 9"1 and a half standing reach and a 38" vert, puts his reach at 12"2 and 3 quarters, for comparison Dwight and JaVale were 12"3 (Cousins 11"8). He also said he's hit 41" before in vert, which doesn't seem like a big stretch.


Tellem
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.

Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
black bart
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 40
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#249 » by black bart » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:47 pm

Pops wrote:
7-Day Dray wrote:
Drummond does have a very wide body but didn't get much above average on standing reach, which is equally important for centers. Cousins, for instance, has 4 inches on him there. Drummond also has very small hands which is crucial for easily catching entry passes and posting up. They aren't Kwame Brown small, but they are small. Overall the measurements were neutral for Drummond in regards to expectations. I do suspect he will kill on the vertical tests though.



His hands aren't small, they were bigger than Anthony Davis' hands and among the top 10 at the combine.

Also, he has a 9"1 and a half standing reach and a 38" vert, puts his reach at 12"2 and 3 quarters, for comparison Dwight and JaVale were 12"3 (Cousins 11"8). He also said he's hit 41" before in vert, which doesn't seem like a big stretch.
He also has 50 pounds on javale mcgee and 30 pounds on dwight. He is a freak
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#250 » by ManualRam » Fri Jun 8, 2012 10:47 pm

hype_2004 wrote:
MalonesElbows wrote:
nhh90 wrote:Drummond is second. I don't know how you don't take those measurements second


This. Plus most 270 lb guys are lucky to have a 30' vertical, and Drummond has a 38 :o


Thus kid will be a monster imagine being 300 lbs with speed, agility and vertical of a SF, if this doesn't warrant consideration for the no.1 pick then I don't know what is.

i can see the argument being made for him being #1 if you just ignore the whole "how does he play basketball" part of the equation.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,544
And1: 16,336
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#251 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:12 pm

Klomp wrote:Bold prediction: Meyers Leonard will be drafted ahead of Andre Drummond.


My guess is Cleveland takes Leonard over Drummond, but if CLE takes someone else at 4 then it's likely Drummond goes first. I'm putting Leonard 4th to CLE from now on my mocks though. Seems like the right fit with Irving, TT/Varejao, Big Z, etc.
Liberate The Zoomers
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,595
And1: 22,152
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#252 » by Klomp » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:18 pm

Superiorblogman wrote:And Leonard had the worse freshman year of anyone that is a first round prospect. It is silly to compare someone's freshman year to someone's sophomore year. Real scouts compare people on a equal basis then try to gauge the rate in which a player should grow.

If that's how you rate prospects, Thomas Robinson should be a late first rounder because he averaged just 0.4 ppg more than Meyers Leonard in their freshman seasons. Fab Melo was in that range too.

Drummond will have a nice impact on the defensive end, but he will never be the kind of player who you can throw it in the low block and expect him to score. A lot like how Dwight struggles on the offensive end outside of 5 feet from the basket.

On the other hand, I think Leonard may not be as good on the defensive side of the ball, but will have a solid low post repertoire, much like an Andrew Bynum.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,544
And1: 16,336
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#253 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:18 pm

I think Harrison Barnes is the red herring of the draft. His go to NBA skill is fadeaway 20 foot jumpers. I've been putting together a Barnes scouting video over the last 3 days and literally 50-70% of his shot attempts were fadeaway midrange shots. I could Golden State taking him 7 because they have the PG/SG/PF/C spots filled long term, but I could also see him going like 18th with Chad Ford having just been out to lunch for months and teams being much more aware than they're given credit for that they don't want to use a lotto pick to get a skill as abundant as low percentage midrange jumpshooting
Liberate The Zoomers
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,595
And1: 22,152
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#254 » by Klomp » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:20 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:Seems like the right fit with Irving, TT/Varejao, Big Z, etc.

When did he come out of retirement?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#255 » by 7-Day Dray » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:21 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:I think Harrison Barnes is the red herring of the draft. His go to NBA skill is fadeaway 20 foot jumpers. I've been putting together a Barnes scouting video over the last 3 days and literally 50-70% of his shot attempts were fadeaway midrange shots. I could Golden State taking him 7 because they have the PG/SG/PF/C spots filled long term, but I could also see him going like 18th with Chad Ford having just been out to lunch for months and teams being much more aware than they're given credit for that they don't want to use a lotto pick to get a skill as abundant as low percentage midrange jumpshooting


Yeah, the way he's always fading away even when he goes to the rim is a turnoff. He has the frame to absorb contact too, but he seems like a soft player.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,544
And1: 16,336
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#256 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:22 pm

I meant to help develop/tutor him (Z is a Cavs executive now - maybe his role is too big to get in on practices, but anyways)
Liberate The Zoomers
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#257 » by 7-Day Dray » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:30 pm

nhh90 wrote:
Pops wrote:
7-Day Dray wrote:
Drummond does have a very wide body but didn't get much above average on standing reach, which is equally important for centers. Cousins, for instance, has 4 inches on him there. Drummond also has very small hands which is crucial for easily catching entry passes and posting up. They aren't Kwame Brown small, but they are small. Overall the measurements were neutral for Drummond in regards to expectations. I do suspect he will kill on the vertical tests though.



His hands aren't small, they were bigger than Anthony Davis' hands and among the top 10 at the combine.

Also, he has a 9"1 and a half standing reach and a 38" vert, puts his reach at 12"2 and 3 quarters, for comparison Dwight and JaVale were 12"3 (Cousins 11"8). He also said he's hit 41" before in vert, which doesn't seem like a big stretch.
He also has 50 pounds on javale mcgee and 30 pounds on dwight. He is a freak


JaVale McGee has a 9'6.5" standing reach though, while Dwight's is 9'3.5", despite being shorter. Drummond's reach is 9'1".
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,573
And1: 4,040
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#258 » by EvanZ » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:32 pm

Yeah, the reach makes a big difference for interior defenders.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,490
And1: 1,337
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#259 » by jman3134 » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:45 pm

Not that this matters all that much, but Jae Crowder really struggled against Middleton in the 2 on 2's. Middleton is someone who is completely overlooked, but is definitely better than his numbers this past season.
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

Re: Draft Combine discussion thread 

Post#260 » by richboy » Sat Jun 9, 2012 12:01 am

ElMaestro90 wrote:Bradley Beal : 6'3.25 w/o shoes, 6'4.75 w/shoes, 6'8 wingspan, 8'3 standing reach (not good)
Anthony Davis: 6'9.25 w/o shoes, 6'10.5 w/shoes, 7'5.5 wing (freak), 9'0 standing reach
Andre Drummond: 6' 9.75" w/o shoes , 6' 11.75" shoes, 7' 6.25" wing 9' 1.5" reach (will help his stock)
Thomas Robinson: 6' 7.75" w/o shoes, 6' 8.75" shoes and 7' 3.25" wing 8' 10" reach (reach is a little short)
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist 6' 5.75" socks 6' 7.5" shoes and 7' 0" wing 8'8.5" reach
Terrence Jones 6' 8.25" socks 6' 9.5" shoes and 7' 2.5" wing 8' 9.5 reach
Jared Sullinger 6' 7.75" socks 6' 9" shoes and 7' 1.25" wing 8' 11" reach
Damian Lillard 6'1.75" socks 6' 2.75" shoes and 6' 7.5" wing 8' 0" reach
Dion Waiters 6' 2.5" socks 6' 4" shoes and 6' 7.35" wing 8' 2" reach
Austin Rivers 6' 3.5" socks 6' 5" shoes and 6' 7.25" wing 8' 1" reach
Perry Jones 6' 10.25" socks 6' 11.5" shoes and 7' 1.75" wing 8' 10.5" reach
Jeremy Lamb 6' 4" socks 6' 5.25" shoes and 6' 11" wing 8' 5" reach
Kendall Marshall 6'3.25" socks 6' 4.25" shoes and 6' 5.5" wing 7' 10.5" reach
Tyler Zeller 6' 11.25" socks 7' 0.5" shoes and 7' 0" wing 8' 8" reach
Meyers Leonard 6' 11.75" socks 7' 1.25" shoes and 7' 3" wing 9' 0.5" reach
John Henson 6' 9" socks 6' 10.5" shoes and 7' 5" wing 9' 3.5" reach
Terrence Ross 6' 6" socks 6' 7" shoes and 6' 7,25" wing 8' 5" reach


Anthony Davis reach would make me nervous. Could suggest he was a very good athlete blocking shots on a small league. That at the NBA level he won't have the same impact.

Robinson not that bad. Looking at him I was expecting something like a 8'8 standing reach.

Wish Zeller was a little longer.

Sullinger looks like a winner. 6'9 with 8'11 standing reach. To me he has a good shot at being a lesser version of Al Horford.

Drummond has legit NBA center size and length. Not the ridiculous standing reach of Deandre Jordan though.

Davis Standing Reach is the shocking one though. I think that put him about 6 inches lower than Javale Mcgee arms up. Wingspan is solid but that helps you more on the perimeter.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden

Return to NBA Draft