shortmikeshortt wrote:Nooo Fredrick you went too far! If you wanna say we need Lamb over Lillard I can accept that, I completely disagree with it, but I can accept it...over Drummond, sure maybe, but TRob? Damn man thats too far...u also said Lillard has the most 'uncertainty among all lottery prospects', when surely Lamb has more uncertainty to reach his potential?...and then you topped it off by calling Lillard a soon to be 23 year old rookie - Lillard is 21 years old, so unless he stays in school 2 more years that aint possible.
Also its possible you are downplaying the importance of the interview process...I'm sure 1 or 2 'errs and umms' to particular questions is not a big deal - but to show a pattern of...well...of...being a bonehead (for lack of a better word) doesn't bode well for his character and what kind of person he is (he called Nic Batum 'the light skinned dude!'). Being able to handle pressure, media etc, its all part of the gig, and being a high character guy is of MAJOR importance...I'm not saying the interviews expose that completely and that's all its about, but it certainly doesn't show good signs. (Speaking of which, who else falls in love with Harrison Barnes when you watch his interviews??)
I went what far? I said we should take Lamb over T-Rob and the rest, and also include the fact that "Maybe T-Rob as BPA" but it doesn't matter, T-Rob realistically won't be in our range anyways. Lillard has most uncertainty in terms of his conference play, no way you can't admit that. He didn't even compete at higher competition level which explains why scouts still have questions about him. Sure, not 23, but soon to be 22 which already is yr 1 or 2 older than most lottery prospects. I also won't let draft combines to dictate my decision on things like "he's a draft combine stud, he got me sold now, he's going to be a star!" This is just the initial process of a draft, there's more to analyze than just combine performances and physical features.
I'm not downplaying interview process, its definitely a tool to impress scouts, but the most emphasis of this draft process shouldn't be based on interview alone, drills/workout are incredibly valuable researching process on a prospect's game. So don't even try to jump to conclusion this fast on him, its actually you guys that are overplaying the interview process, he's talented/skilled on the floor whether he has fear or nervousness to face media, don't put extreme emphasis into it. Draft workout is next week, we need all the information we need to gather. Interview process alone isn't enough to dictate the whole evaluation of prospect. So I don't let interview process to jump to conclusions .