The Trail Blazers were one of "many teams" who were disappointed with Connecticut SG Jeremy Lamb's pre-draft workouts.
He hasn't even been doing well in workouts according to rotoworld
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
The Trail Blazers were one of "many teams" who were disappointed with Connecticut SG Jeremy Lamb's pre-draft workouts.

BD12 wrote:Yea, the Raps have no "leader" on the team to push/motivate our young guys, yet you guys want to draft Lamb who has a soft mentality and looks so unmotivated 100% of the time. The Raps have too many of those players...Ed Davis, Bargs, etc. And Lamb would have to look up to these guys for support in the first couple of seasons. Smells like disaster. I'd rather take someone that is ready to battle night in and night out, isn't afraid to take last second shots, and shows a lot of heart and passion for the game. Rivers meet those qualities. Lamb honestly doesn't fit into our "culture" - Raps will pass over this dude. Book it.
Jeremy Lamb is one of the top-rated shooting guards projected in the 2012 draft, but has struggled with a tendency to disappear against tough competition.
Many talent evaluators believe Lamb is too laid back, even going so far as to label the 6-foot-5 scoring guard as soft.
"I think that's his deal," said a Central Division executive. "It gives you a little bit (of concern) but that program's turned out a lot of good players. I think you have to give him the benefit of the doubt. If you can play for [coach Jim] Calhoun you can play for a lot of coaches. He's got some tools. He's really athletic. And people seem to like the kid, too. He's just pretty passive."
One opposing coach criticized Lamb’s effort and energy.
"When you give him space and you let him do his thing he's got it going pretty good," the coach said. "But when you get up in him and deny him the ball and make him work for his shot, he doesn't seem to be the most competitive guy. But he's good. He can shoot it. It just depends on how competitive he's going to be on that given day."

Undefeated wrote:So, you believe everything they say? It helps to form your own opinion by watching the games too, you know?
Master Ze wrote:You can understand a lot about a player by hearing them talk. He sounds clueless, doesn't know what's going on. His attitude and tone is laid back and Lamb even admitted he's been accused of that. He's a gifted player, but has no motor and now I can understand why Chad Ford and DX had ranked him so low in their previous mocks.
I thought when BC didn't mention Lamb he was just trying to hide the teams interest in him but it could easily just be that he doesn't like Lamb. Ed Stefanski said that management takes into account a variety of factors when drafting a player including their attitude and how they are off the court. Drummond would be a much better pick than Lamb, not only is he more valuable to other NBA teams but he's also got a much higher upside. Drummond's worst case in his rookie season would still be 10 times better than Aaron Gray. I bet you can't find a single mock where Drummond is lower than Lamb.

BD12 wrote:Undefeated wrote:So, you believe everything they say? It helps to form your own opinion by watching the games too, you know?
They've probably watched more UCONN games than you so yes I can't just take their opinions with a grain of salt.
BD12 wrote:frederick, its not just the interview process alone although some people have hopped off the bandwagon because of that.The Trail Blazers were one of "many teams" who were disappointed with Connecticut SG Jeremy Lamb's pre-draft workouts.
He hasn't even been doing well in workouts according to rotoworld


DraftExpress
What's funny is that I had lunch with Terrence Ross' agent yesterday. We talked about every possible scenario. Toronto never came up.

BD12 wrote:Watching the game on TV is different from watching it from the stands, behind the UCONN bench, etc. Just saying.
fredericklove wrote:BD12 wrote:frederick, its not just the interview process alone although some people have hopped off the bandwagon because of that.The Trail Blazers were one of "many teams" who were disappointed with Connecticut SG Jeremy Lamb's pre-draft workouts.
He hasn't even been doing well in workouts according to rotoworld
Who are the many teams, there's lack of coverage on this resource, as you know there's always these type of media resources to alter the draft dynamics of prospects, oh he didn't do well in one workout oh he's gonna be bad, oh the other guy blew away the combine workout, oh he's definitely legit. Most other teams haven't even tested him out yet, especially the Raptors. So Blazers alone isn't going to change my mind.
Undefeated wrote:BD12 wrote:Watching the game on TV is different from watching it from the stands, behind the UCONN bench, etc. Just saying.
Wtf. It makes no difference. You have beat writers from Toronto writing pure hyperboles, and you expect the readers to believe that? I doubt they've watched the games from the stands like you say nor have they watched a dozen games. I'm not saying Lamb has no flaws, but some of the things I've read, I did not see. They say he's not motivated, but why? Is it because of playing with two ball hogs like I've seen?
BD12 wrote:Yea, the Raps have no "leader" on the team to push/motivate our young guys, yet you guys want to draft Lamb who has a soft mentality and looks so unmotivated 100% of the time. The Raps have too many of those players...Ed Davis, Bargs, etc. And Lamb would have to look up to these guys for support in the first couple of seasons. Smells like disaster. I'd rather take someone that is ready to battle night in and night out, isn't afraid to take last second shots, and shows a lot of heart and passion for the game. Rivers meet those qualities. Lamb honestly doesn't fit into our "culture" - Raps will pass over this dude. Book it.

BD12 wrote:Those quotes were from a David Aldridge article on NBA.com, not Toronto Sun.
<--- May 22 2012Dr Mufasa wrote: I wouldn't bet any of my personal money on Valanciunas being in the NBA after his rookie contract.
Ku-Bar wrote:With all the mock drafts I've seen on any website pre and post combine there are only two consensus picks in the entire draft.
NOH # 1 - A. Davis
and for whatever reason
TOR # 8 - J. Lamb
Like someone just mentioned we are not drafting a franchise changer so how can Lamb be the only logical selection in the minds of reporters and followers?
Honestly, if BC picks Lamb I want Stephan A. Smith to sound off like a maniac same as when Babcock selected fellow UCONN Huskie CV. "what in the ... on earth is Mr. Babcock (B-Collar) thinking?"
Obviously, I vote 0% re: the OP poll.
BillyGM wrote:
fredericklove wrote:Master Ze wrote:You can understand a lot about a player by hearing them talk. He sounds clueless, doesn't know what's going on. His attitude and tone is laid back and Lamb even admitted he's been accused of that. He's a gifted player, but has no motor and now I can understand why Chad Ford and DX had ranked him so low in their previous mocks.
I thought when BC didn't mention Lamb he was just trying to hide the teams interest in him but it could easily just be that he doesn't like Lamb. Ed Stefanski said that management takes into account a variety of factors when drafting a player including their attitude and how they are off the court. Drummond would be a much better pick than Lamb, not only is he more valuable to other NBA teams but he's also got a much higher upside. Drummond's worst case in his rookie season would still be 10 times better than Aaron Gray. I bet you can't find a single mock where Drummond is lower than Lamb.
Being a long time Lamb fan like yourself should know about Lamb's skillset on the floor, its actions rather than talkin' to media that reflects on attitude/off-court, I"m pretty sure Lamb is well-behaved off-court, attitude is laidback but he can flat out score and create for himself at the end of the day.

