MisterWestside, sorry, if I gave the impression that Nowitzki would get full credit for each point scored when he is on the court, because that is not the case. And I really can't remember saying that at all. But when we have 12 years of data in which the the increase in offensive efficieny with Nowitzki is bigger than what we would expect by his boxscore numbers, we can either conclude that Nowitzki is the luckiest guy to ever play basketball, because just by coincedence he was on the court when his teammates made their shots while they were just unlucky to not make them when he was off, or we can conclude that Nowitzki brings value to the team off the ball. What do you think is more reasonable?
Again, I'm not saying Dirk isn't contributing to the game off the ball. I simply want to figure out what his total contribution to the team (including off-ball) is after you account for everything else (teammates, opponent, etc.) Even +/- numbers can be confounded by other factors. That's all.






















