MDStar wrote:How is what we're doing "deviating" from the plan? It seems very similar if you ask me.
I was partially responding to this:
veji1 wrote:This sort of "title or bust" mindset, with the incessant "OKC model" mantra are an unsustainable delusion that can only lead to bitterness for 25 out of the 30 fanbases in the NBA.
Maybe you two should talk amongst yourselves.
I rarely mention "OKC model," but where it appears to be a deviation to me is adding too much high-priced veteran salary before the team is ready for that direction. What if Beal (or MKG, or Barnes, etc) doesn't pan out? What if Vesely doesn't develop beyond rotation player? What if Seraphin isn't ever quite on Ibaka's level? Sure, that's the breaks, but w/ Nene and Okafor in the middle and a (hopefully) improving Wall, this team should be good for 30-40 wins. Just enough to likely never get a high pick. Maybe they were already on their way to such a record without the additions (as I think they were), but that "pick and a prospect" rings in my ears. And look at the kind of FA additions OKC made: Sefalosha came first, and he looks like the kind of addition I would imagine would have made sense this year, not necessarily a defender, but a complimentary, team-oriented role player on a small contract. Then Perkins. Then Fisher. The three of them, all FAs, cost a little more than $12.5 million. In a tiny market. If you wait until it looks like there's something to go to, sometimes the FAs will come to you. As long as you have some money to spend.
There's really no right or wrong in this. It's my perception, one that's obviously shared by others. You don't share it. I hope you and yours are right, because I hate losing, and I won't be too much happier with Wall's peak years being near misses and 1st round eliminations.
PS: In a roundabout way, a number of people have addressed your supposition that Wizards strategy may have been to bypass big name FAs. As a number of us have asserted, we're not tied to signing Harden, Gordon, Anderson, etc., although I would hope they would at least occasionally explore the option. I was more attracted to getting young players, and otherwise adding veterans prudently and economically. Okafor may be on his downside, but he's a good player, and I don't mind Ariza as much as a few here do. I just don't understand the urgency to acquire these two players, at the cost of nearly $30 million over the next two years,
right now. Time will tell. Maybe there's a flip (not Flip) in the future that will make it all make sense.