ImageImage

Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged)

Moderators: JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever

Trade pick for players, trade for picks or keep it?

Trade for player(s)
7
14%
Trade back for multiple picks
31
61%
Keep pick
13
25%
 
Total votes: 51

User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,124
And1: 17,167
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#701 » by Liver_Pooty » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:11 pm

Bobcats need to, and probably will stay in the top 4 even if they do trade doen. Quality trumpts Quantity in the NBA, and they can get both quality, and quantity if they trade the 2 for 4 and 24 from Cleveland.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
countryboi
Head Coach
Posts: 7,373
And1: 1,506
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#702 » by countryboi » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:28 pm

NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
_tijo_
Hornets Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 743
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 05, 2007
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#703 » by _tijo_ » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:41 pm

countryboi wrote:NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management


Word.

Apparently, Houston offered the Kings the 14 + 16 for the 5 and Tyreke. If Sacramento does that, they are much dumber than I thought.
Who I woulda took:
2023: Miller | 2022: Duren | 2021: Bouknight, Jones | 2020: Ball | 2019: PJ | 2018: MPJ | 2017: Monk | 2016: Damian Jones | 2015: Winslow | 2014: Vonleh, Napier | 2013: McLemore | 2012: MKG | 2011: Knight, Kawhi
NataFresh
Sophomore
Posts: 179
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 22, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#704 » by NataFresh » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:54 pm

countryboi wrote:NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management


This is where I disagree, this is where you put the scouting database to the test...again I'm going to ask are we sure that Robinson at 4 is better than Sullinger at 18 or Meyers Leonard at 14 ? or Barnes better at 2 or 4 is better than Harkless or PJII at 14 or 16. Hell we could even pick up Kendall Marshall....the idea here is to use Cho's scouting database to fill need positions for talent on this roster and develop it together.
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#705 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:16 pm

Word that Houston is offer Sac #14, #16 and Lowery for Tyreke Evans and #5. This per DX. Says the offer is now up to Sac to accept or refuse.
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#706 » by bobcats3wallace » Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:24 pm

Houston has an interesting case here for multiple trades. There have been rumors of 14+16+Dalembert for #5. Apparently Sactown wants Cousins at 4 and feels comfortable with Dalembert from his past with them. They may also feel they could get solid return on 14 and 16 in this draft.

Houston could the turn around and trade Lowry + 18 to Toronto for 8. This leaves Houston with #5 and #8 plus some interesting pieces like Courtney Lee and Kevin Martin. They could put a package for Dwight together of 5+8+Martin for Howard. For Houston they could then resign Goran Dragic, have Lee at 2guard, Parsons at SF, Scola at PF and Howard at C. They could even have money to sign Williams this offseason as well, in this kind of scenario. Bottom line though, even if it is Dragic/Lee/Parsons/Scola/Howard with cap room to sign depth. That is a better team than the one Howard is on now in Orlando.

For Orlando I'm not sure they will find much better of an offer than two top 10 picks and a productive player on an expiring deal. Houston will be interesting to watch for sure.
User avatar
doc.end
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 191
Joined: May 04, 2006
Location: Prague, CZE

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#707 » by doc.end » Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:54 pm

ohara wrote:
None taken. But both ESPN and nbadraft.net have him listed as a SF. DX has him listed as a PF. So I dont think "clearly" is an appropriate word no matter which position one argues for Royce.

That's your answer. Why should you assume DraftExpress would have that wrong?!
Image
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,621
And1: 6,561
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#708 » by SWedd523 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:58 pm

NataFresh wrote:
countryboi wrote:NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management


This is where I disagree, this is where you put the scouting database to the test...again I'm going to ask are we sure that Robinson at 4 is better than Sullinger at 18 or Meyers Leonard at 14 ? or Barnes better at 2 or 4 is better than Harkless or PJII at 14 or 16. Hell we could even pick up Kendall Marshall....the idea here is to use Cho's scouting database to fill need positions for talent on this roster and develop it together.

One really good player is better than two pretty good players.

In the NBA, four quarters does not equal a dollar bill
Image
User avatar
Niko23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,677
And1: 920
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
     

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#709 » by Niko23 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:00 pm

Hey Guys - I am listening to Cleveland Radio and its being "reported" that the Cats would also be comfortable with 2 for 4 and both our 2nds - which i believe are 33 and 34.....probably just speculation.
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#710 » by BeesWax » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:01 pm

SWedd523 wrote:
NataFresh wrote:
countryboi wrote:NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management


This is where I disagree, this is where you put the scouting database to the test...again I'm going to ask are we sure that Robinson at 4 is better than Sullinger at 18 or Meyers Leonard at 14 ? or Barnes better at 2 or 4 is better than Harkless or PJII at 14 or 16. Hell we could even pick up Kendall Marshall....the idea here is to use Cho's scouting database to fill need positions for talent on this roster and develop it together.

One really good player is better than two pretty good players.

In the NBA, four quarters does not equal a dollar bill


Yep but if there are no really good players two pretty good players is better than one pretty good player. If we are thinking Robinson then trade back and pick up a backup big later and other talent. That way we get more than just one bench player out of the draft.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
NataFresh
Sophomore
Posts: 179
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 22, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#711 » by NataFresh » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:05 pm

SWedd523 wrote:
NataFresh wrote:
countryboi wrote:NBA is all about quality over quantity one thomas robinson is worth 10 quincy millers....it would be different if we had a early first and a few middle rounders but to trade a early first for a bunch of mid rounders is just bad bad team management


This is where I disagree, this is where you put the scouting database to the test...again I'm going to ask are we sure that Robinson at 4 is better than Sullinger at 18 or Meyers Leonard at 14 ? or Barnes better at 2 or 4 is better than Harkless or PJII at 14 or 16. Hell we could even pick up Kendall Marshall....the idea here is to use Cho's scouting database to fill need positions for talent on this roster and develop it together.

One really good player is better than two pretty good players.

In the NBA, four quarters does not equal a dollar bill



I get what you're saying, I'm just not sure there's a real talent difference from 2-20 in this draft....
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#712 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:38 pm

Niko23 wrote:Hey Guys - I am listening to Cleveland Radio and its being "reported" that the Cats would also be comfortable with 2 for 4 and both our 2nds - which i believe are 33 and 34.....probably just speculation.

We need 24 :(
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#713 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:39 pm

Niko23 wrote:Hey Guys - I am listening to Cleveland Radio and its being "reported" that the Cats would also be comfortable with 2 for 4 and both our 2nds - which i believe are 33 and 34.....probably just speculation.


Not going to kill the messenger. I know the Cavs want that deal, but cannot see Charlotte doing it. #4 and #24 is the minimum. I am sure that Charlotte wants #4 , #24 AND to pawn off a contract like Carroll, but would also take #4, #24 and #33. If they go with the #4 and #33 and #34, I would feel the FO caved. They can do better.
User avatar
Felton for Pres
Pro Prospect
Posts: 902
And1: 0
Joined: May 16, 2008
Location: Queen City

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#714 » by Felton for Pres » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:41 pm

I do not want 3 2nd round picks. That's not the depth we need.
User avatar
Badd_Intentions
Rookie
Posts: 1,052
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2007

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#715 » by Badd_Intentions » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:44 pm

2 2nd round picks shouldn't be enough to move from 4 to 2. we need the 24 at the bare minimum for anything to be in it for us.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#716 » by BigSlam » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:49 pm

Niko23 wrote:Hey Guys - I am listening to Cleveland Radio and its being "reported" that the Cats would also be comfortable with 2 for 4 and both our 2nds - which i believe are 33 and 34.....probably just speculation.

I'd do #2 for #4, #33 and #34................but only if Tyrus was going out with the #2 as well.
B B M F 'ers
Bassman
Head Coach
Posts: 6,134
And1: 2,148
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Bye FL back to MO; NC born & bred
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#717 » by Bassman » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:52 pm

Badd_Intentions wrote:2 2nd round picks shouldn't be enough to move from 4 to 2. we need the 24 at the bare minimum for anything to be in it for us.


If that's the best offer from Cleveland I'd rather trade with Washington and get their #32 pick as compensation. The Wiz get Beal, we get Robinson, and 2 quality role players on 2nd round contracts.
I continue to wait...and hope...for the return to Hornet's glory.
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#718 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:53 pm

doc.end wrote:
ohara wrote:
None taken. But both ESPN and nbadraft.net have him listed as a SF. DX has him listed as a PF. So I dont think "clearly" is an appropriate word no matter which position one argues for Royce.

That's your answer. Why should you assume DraftExpress would have that wrong?!


Damn Doc, read will you. I did not say DX was wrong. What I said was it is not a "clear" decision on whether he is a SF or a PF when you have different respected organizations calling him for 2 different positions. I am simply saying there is an argument for both sides.
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#719 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:54 pm

BigSlam wrote:
Niko23 wrote:Hey Guys - I am listening to Cleveland Radio and its being "reported" that the Cats would also be comfortable with 2 for 4 and both our 2nds - which i believe are 33 and 34.....probably just speculation.

I'd do #2 for #4, #33 and #34................but only if Tyrus was going out with the #2 as well.

we'd have to give up 31 there, which is fine...
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,665
And1: 14,334
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#720 » by HornetJail » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:05 pm

As long as we are getting those second round picks with the intention of trading into the top 25. To think that a guy of Quincy Miller's caliber could be had at #25 makes me pretty excited.
investigate Adam Silver

Return to Charlotte Hornets