ImageImage

Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged)

Moderators: JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever

Trade pick for players, trade for picks or keep it?

Trade for player(s)
7
14%
Trade back for multiple picks
31
61%
Keep pick
13
25%
 
Total votes: 51

captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#741 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:06 pm

fatlever wrote:no chance i let the cavs move ahead of us for as little as the 33rd pick. i decline that on principle alone, even if i am 100% convinced my guy would still be there at 4. not gonna help a team out for that little.

would you go

4, 24, 34

for

2, 31

?
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#742 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:09 pm

captaincrunk wrote:
fatlever wrote:no chance i let the cavs move ahead of us for as little as the 33rd pick. i decline that on principle alone, even if i am 100% convinced my guy would still be there at 4. not gonna help a team out for that little.

would you go

4, 24, 34

for

2, 31

?


Rufus on fire saying they are discussing #4, #24 and #34 for #2.
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#743 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:14 pm

ohara wrote:
captaincrunk wrote:
fatlever wrote:no chance i let the cavs move ahead of us for as little as the 33rd pick. i decline that on principle alone, even if i am 100% convinced my guy would still be there at 4. not gonna help a team out for that little.

would you go

4, 24, 34

for

2, 31

?


Rufus on fire saying they are discussing #4, #24 and #34 for #2.

Which we'd all do immediately. I'm asking if giving up our 31 as well is still good enough.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,556
And1: 16,111
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#744 » by fatlever » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:19 pm

captaincrunk wrote:
fatlever wrote:no chance i let the cavs move ahead of us for as little as the 33rd pick. i decline that on principle alone, even if i am 100% convinced my guy would still be there at 4. not gonna help a team out for that little.

would you go

4, 24, 34

for

2, 31

?


probably
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#745 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:22 pm

e'd be moving back from 2 to4 and from 31 to 34, and win the 24th pick for our trouble.

Probably worth it I think too. Package 24 and 34 if you aren't happy with those guys and wanna move up a bit, or don't if you like those guys.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#746 » by BigSlam » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:27 pm

captaincrunk wrote:
fatlever wrote:no chance i let the cavs move ahead of us for as little as the 33rd pick. i decline that on principle alone, even if i am 100% convinced my guy would still be there at 4. not gonna help a team out for that little.

would you go

4, 24, 34

for

2, 31

?

I'd be down.
B B M F 'ers
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#747 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:42 pm

Cho will do better. He will surprise us.
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#748 » by bobcats3wallace » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:43 pm

The Rufus on Fire report seems to back-up another report that was out there, I think from Steve Kyler. He said that it was 2 for 4 + 24 and possible 34. It's pretty obvious the Cho affect here...gotta love it. I think Cho's looking at it as that extra second rounder could net them John Jenkins AND Kim English. Or perhaps Tony Wrotten and Kim English. Still, solid talent left in that top 5 or so of the second round. Also gives you options to get back into the late first for salary reasons for other teams.

I would be fine with 2 for 4 + 24 by itself and either Trob or Barnes at 4. If we could get another second out of it and still get Trob I would be ecstatic. Who knows, even if we are stuck with Barnes at 4, perhaps Sully would even fall all the way to 24. Can't wait to see what the Chomiester does.
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#749 » by bobcats3wallace » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:44 pm

ohara wrote:Cho will do better. He will surprise us.


Watch him get us 4 + 24 + 34 AND throw them Thomas' contract. Haha. Doubtful, but would be hilarious.
Bassman
Head Coach
Posts: 6,134
And1: 2,148
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Bye FL back to MO; NC born & bred
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#750 » by Bassman » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:55 pm

captaincrunk wrote:e'd be moving back from 2 to4 and from 31 to 34, and win the 24th pick for our trouble.

Probably worth it I think too. Package 24 and 34 if you aren't happy with those guys and wanna move up a bit, or don't if you like those guys.


Yep, I could live with that. Ideally Robinson would still be there, which allows us to use the 24 pick on either Jeff Taylor or Quincy Miller at SF (better case scenario). If Robinson was gone I'd take Barnes at 4 and target Moultrie or Perry Jones via a trade up into the late teens using the 24 and perhaps a future 2nd rounder. If they are gone and we're stuck at 24 perhaps go with Sullinger if he's slid that far, and target our sniper at 34 (Kim english). Or go sniper at 24 (Jenkins) and hope Plumlee is still available at 34.
I continue to wait...and hope...for the return to Hornet's glory.
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#751 » by captaincrunk » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:57 pm

Bassman wrote:
captaincrunk wrote:e'd be moving back from 2 to4 and from 31 to 34, and win the 24th pick for our trouble.

Probably worth it I think too. Package 24 and 34 if you aren't happy with those guys and wanna move up a bit, or don't if you like those guys.


Yep, I could live with that. Ideally Robinson would still be there, which allows us to use the 24 pick on either Jeff Taylor or Quincy Miller at SF (better case scenario). If Robinson was gone I'd take Barnes at 4 and target Moultrie or Perry Jones via a trade up into the late teens using the 24 and perhaps a future 2nd rounder. If they are gone and we're stuck at 24 perhaps go with Sullinger if he's slid that far, and target our sniper at 34 (Kim english). Or go sniper at 24 (Jenkins) and hope Plumlee is still available at 34.

Well if Robinson is gone, that means Either MKG or Drummond would be there, both better options than Barnes.

And I'd take the later sniper and go with a SF if we take Robinson. If we take Drummond or a SF, we could take royce White, Sullinger, or a SF, or a SG, or anything that isn't fab melo.
_tijo_
Hornets Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 743
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 05, 2007
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#752 » by _tijo_ » Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:00 pm

Bertinho wrote:If Washington and Cavs are interesed in our pick we have a lot of possibilities: (remember we will not have 2º round in the next draft)

trade 1:

Cavs: #2
Cats: #4, #24, Cavs´2º round pick 2013

trade 2:

Wizards: #2 and Tyrus Thomas
Cats: #3, Ariza and Wizards 2º round pick 2013.

This would be perfect.


How about both? Hear me out on this one...

Washington's board goes Beal, MKG.
Cleveland's board goes Beal, Barnes.

This is what we do... we do a trade with Washington, something like 2 for 3 + 32 + a 2013 2nd rounder. They do this to ensure they get Beal.

Then we talk to Cleveland saying we are going to take Barnes, Cleveland loses out on both their shooters. MKG is not a shooter, so they risk losing out on both, so they offer the 4 + 24 for the 3. They get Barnes.

At 4, we take ThoR or MKG. We package the 24 and 31 to someone to get back into the mid first to get someone like Terrence Ross (if we take Thor) or Perry Jones (if we take MKG). We take our shooter with 32 - John Jenkins

So we end up with a 2nd rounder next year, plus a lineup of Kemba, Hendo, Ross, ThoR, and Biz. Not a bad 5 to run with under Dunlap, with Jenkins being the Steve Kerr.
Who I woulda took:
2023: Miller | 2022: Duren | 2021: Bouknight, Jones | 2020: Ball | 2019: PJ | 2018: MPJ | 2017: Monk | 2016: Damian Jones | 2015: Winslow | 2014: Vonleh, Napier | 2013: McLemore | 2012: MKG | 2011: Knight, Kawhi
User avatar
TheKingofSting
RealGM
Posts: 17,830
And1: 2,165
Joined: Jun 24, 2011
       

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#753 » by TheKingofSting » Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:09 pm

" Cleveland wants Beal and has offered the No. 4 pick and either the 33rd or 34th pick to Charlotte for the No. 2 pick, which would allow the Cavs to jump ahead of Washington and land the Florida guard. The hangup is that Charlotte, not in love with anyone available at No. 2, wants Cleveland's 24th pick. Cleveland also has had conversations with Sacramento (No. 5) and Golden State (No. 7), but the Charlotte deal makes the most sense and sources say there is enough momentum and desire on both sides to get it done. The Bobcats like Robinson and Barnes, and at least one of them will be available at No. 4; if Cleveland got Beal with the second pick, Washington might take Barnes at No. 3, sources said."

Cbs


..
President of the Quinn Cook Fan Club

Bradley Beal has D Wade potential
ohara
Head Coach
Posts: 7,237
And1: 167
Joined: May 24, 2008

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#754 » by ohara » Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:19 pm

If we trade with Cleveland and get #4 and #24, and get T-Rob at #4, I have a hunch that even if a SF like Quincy Miller is there at #24, they will look long and hard at Will Barton at #24. He's moving up the draft boards fast. I know we are thinking of English and a couple other sharp shooters at #31, but I think Barton brings a lot more. He'd be worth the #24 pick. I would however not have any problem taking Miller or Sullinger at #24 and then going with English at #31.
Jaruff
RealGM
Posts: 17,035
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 27, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#755 » by Jaruff » Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:13 pm

Somewhat OT: That second rounder we traded for Mullens was awarded to Boston today for the Jeff Green debacle.

Apparently it's unprotected. I thought we had protection on it. Oh well. Still prefer Mullens to anything we'd likely get in the 31-40 range next year.
Kwame Brown Fan Club | Free Gilbert Arenas
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#756 » by bobcats3wallace » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:04 am

I'll let someone else star the new thread, but we just got Ben Gordon and a future first for Maggette.

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Detroit has traded Ben Gordon and a protected future first-round pick to Charlotte for Corey Maggette, league sources tell Y! Sports.
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#757 » by bobcats3wallace » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:05 am

This would lead you to believe they either think Hendo can play SF, have a deal where Hendo is out of here for a SF, or they are going to draft MKG/Barnes...
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,665
And1: 14,334
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#758 » by HornetJail » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:06 am

bobcats3wallace wrote:I'll let someone else star the new thread, but we just got Ben Gordon and a future first for Maggette.

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Detroit has traded Ben Gordon and a protected future first-round pick to Charlotte for Corey Maggette, league sources tell Y! Sports.
fffffffffffffff*****************cccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkk
investigate Adam Silver
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#759 » by bobcats3wallace » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:07 am

This doesn't seem like a "Cho" move...there has to be more coming. If it's a future first, why not wait until after the draft rather than essentially laying our cards on the table. Seems to me like if we stay at 2 then Barnes is the pick....talk about a bad outcome. Lets not panic yet though, lets play it out.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Trading the #2 pick - dicussion (merged) 

Post#760 » by DY_nasty » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:08 am

Kemba2Hendo wrote:
" Cleveland wants Beal and has offered the No. 4 pick and either the 33rd or 34th pick to Charlotte for the No. 2 pick, which would allow the Cavs to jump ahead of Washington and land the Florida guard. The hangup is that Charlotte, not in love with anyone available at No. 2, wants Cleveland's 24th pick. Cleveland also has had conversations with Sacramento (No. 5) and Golden State (No. 7), but the Charlotte deal makes the most sense and sources say there is enough momentum and desire on both sides to get it done. The Bobcats like Robinson and Barnes, and at least one of them will be available at No. 4; if Cleveland got Beal with the second pick, Washington might take Barnes at No. 3, sources said."

Cbs


..

can you post the link with this?

Return to Charlotte Hornets