ImageImage

#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,305
And1: 7,278
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#781 » by randy84 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:24 pm

This trade is bad news for all the people that didn't want to take a center with the draft pick. This pretty much assures that Meyers Leonard will be the pick, unless the Bucks can trade back again.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#782 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:26 pm

So the fact that we traded for a center (who is likely the starter) means it's more likely we draft one? It's not like dropping two spots means everyone is gone, although it probably means we don't get Lamb. I'd be surprised if one of Ross or T. Jones isn't there.
User avatar
Lippo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,046
And1: 976
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#783 » by Lippo » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:44 pm

LUKE23 wrote:So the fact that we traded for a center (who is likely the starter) means it's more likely we draft one? It's not like dropping two spots means everyone is gone, although it probably means we don't get Lamb. I'd be surprised if one of Ross or T. Jones isn't there.



I don't think they will take T.Jones. That would mean they have no chance with resigning Ersan, we have enough 4's. If we take a tweener 3/4 it will be Perry, who looks more like a SF than Terrance. Perry has a great handle and almost looks like Paul George + 2". Plus the kid said he likes Milwaukee which is +gazillion. Terrance looks like a Boozer/Milsap type to me.

Lamb>Waiters>Ross>P.Jones>Harkless IMO.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#784 » by paul » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:46 pm

We just traded for a guy who is 31 and will play < 25mpg, I doubt he'll effect who we draft too much.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#785 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:47 pm

It sounds as if the Bucks would draft Terrence before PJIII. And I don't see Boozer or Millsap in Terrence Jones at all. I'd say a better top level ceiling comparison would be a Josh Smith/Lamar Odom hybrid type.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,691
And1: 1,292
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#786 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:48 pm

LUKE23 wrote:So the fact that we traded for a center (who is likely the starter) means it's more likely we draft one? It's not like dropping two spots means everyone is gone, although it probably means we don't get Lamb. I'd be surprised if one of Ross or T. Jones isn't there.


I'm guessing their thinking is Dalembert for a year and then have a Center in place to take over...if they go a Center. Don't love the thinking, but I guess I can see their rationale if they do.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#787 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:48 pm

paul wrote:We just traded for a guy who is 31 and will play < 25mpg, I doubt he'll effect who we draft too much.


It's the most short-term thinking organization on the planet, so I think it definitely could.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,965
And1: 27,557
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#788 » by trwi7 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:53 pm

DocHoliday wrote: “He’s very familiar with the Bucks’ roster and believes they are headed in the right direction.


He's already a good liar.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#789 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:56 pm

Honestly, if they can somehow get Gooden out of the PF slot, the team could be pretty good (by our standards) next season. But if he's the starting PF, it negates any positives of the offseason.
User avatar
Lippo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,046
And1: 976
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#790 » by Lippo » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:57 pm

Cavs want # 2, but don't want to take on T.Thomas's contract.
How about getting into it

Bucks: T.Thomas/4
Cavs: Gooden/2
Bobcats: Gibson/14/34/Bucks 2013 1st (top 3 prot)
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#791 » by paul » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:58 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
paul wrote:We just traded for a guy who is 31 and will play < 25mpg, I doubt he'll effect who we draft too much.


It's the most short-term thinking organization on the planet, so I think it definitely could.


Fair point.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,965
And1: 27,557
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#792 » by trwi7 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:04 pm

Lippo wrote:Cavs want # 2, but don't want to take on T.Thomas's contract.
How about getting into it

Bucks: T.Thomas/4
Cavs: Gooden/2
Bobcats: Gibson/14/2013 1st (top 3 prot)


They don't want to take Thomas's contract but they'll take Gooden's. Right.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#793 » by xTitan » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:33 pm

Terrence Jones is likely to be Brandon Bass, it his upside was significantly better he wouldn't around at 14.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#794 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:40 pm

Jones and Bass have essentially zero similarities.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#795 » by xTitan » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:40 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Jones and Bass have essentially zero similarities.

just guys...throw patterson in there as well
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,778
And1: 6,986
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#796 » by LUKE23 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:45 pm

Jones is more versatile than either guy. If you want to say he's not going to be a great scorer, I agree. But he's got legit PF size, is athletic, and does a lot of things well.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#797 » by Newz » Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:47 pm

How is he like Bass or Patterson at all?

He can handle the ball and he has pretty good vision. He's a guy you could probably give a try at SF because of his skill set.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,636
And1: 3,212
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#798 » by Licensed to Il » Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:16 pm

Jones has an intriguing skill set. Usually the guys who play like him are shorter and lighter. He is indeed a hybrid (skill wise) but he has legit PF size.

The willingness to move down two spots kind of suggests that the Bucks are very interested in a guy that is currently ranked much lower than 12, like last year when they obviously took a real liking to Tobias H. I am thinking Fournier, Barton, Fab Melo, R White, the Kentucky Lamb, etc.

If they had their hearts set on T Ross, J Lamb, etc I can't see them agreeing to this trade a day before the draft, as opposed to when they were on the clock. I think our pick tomorrow is going to be a little bit of a surprise to those here that adhere to the mock rankings.
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,070
And1: 956
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#799 » by mlloyd10 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:40 pm

Villanoeyebrows wrote:Jones has an intriguing skill set. Usually the guys who play like him are shorter and lighter. He is indeed a hybrid (skill wise) but he has legit PF size.

The willingness to move down two spots kind of suggests that the Bucks are very interested in a guy that is currently ranked much lower than 12, like last year when they obviously took a real liking to Tobias H. I am thinking Fournier, Barton, Fab Melo, R White, the Kentucky Lamb, etc.

If they had their hearts set on T Ross, J Lamb, etc I can't see them agreeing to this trade a day before the draft, as opposed to when they were on the clock. I think our pick tomorrow is going to be a little bit of a surprise to those here that adhere to the mock rankings.



So you dont miss it...This draft is tonight :D
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,954
And1: 41,337
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#800 » by emunney » Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:41 pm

DX has a really nice draft HQ page up.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks