ImageImageImageImageImage

Nets Trade For Joe Johnson

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

PetroNet
Banned User
Posts: 6,461
And1: 136
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#121 » by PetroNet » Tue Jul 3, 2012 3:46 am

Jersey Generals wrote:Because he's turning 27 years old next season and you usually don't add to your game at that point in time?


you make it sound like he is a standard case. he was a kid who came out of high school and always relied on super elite athleticism. he went to the dleague and committed him self to learning how to play basketball in adition to using his athletecism. wouldnt be the first time it took a HS players 5 or 6 years to really come into his own.
Hanging hopes on the 26 year old Gerald Green, who was out of the league not 5 months ago, isn't insane to any of you? Seriously, I'm amazed right now.


twisting words much?
One day, most of you bash Brooks, and now he's "oh, he'll improve and the Nets will be awesomer!"


again, reading is fundamental. no one said he was going to turn into kobe. just that he is one of several players who is young and could improve. sorry to rain on your pity party,... if you hate the moves so much, go root for the knicks
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,446
And1: 414
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#122 » by Jersey Generals » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:03 am

PetroNet wrote:you make it sound like he is a standard case. he was a kid who came out of high school and always relied on super elite athleticism. he went to the dleague and committed him self to learning how to play basketball in adition to using his athletecism. wouldnt be the first time it took a HS players 5 or 6 years to really come into his own.


No, but it would be a first to take 7-8 years to come into his own.

twisting words much?


I didn't need to twist your words, because that's exactly what you said. You did it for me.

again, reading is fundamental. no one said he was going to turn into kobe. just that he is one of several players who is young and could improve.


Whoever mentioned the name Kobe? I never once implied that it would take him to get into Kobe-level place in the game for the Nets to actually improve. So yes, reading is fundamental. And straw-man arguments are not fundamental.

sorry to rain on your pity party,... if you hate the moves so much, go root for the knicks


So because someone hates the moves, they're automatically ignorant and should get out? Wow, sounding like a Knicks fan yourself there, you sure you wouldn't be more happy over there?
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#123 » by VCRJKidd15 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:05 am

beast m0de wrote:Personally- I am hoping that a change of scenery and playing with a top 5 PG is enough motivation for Joe Johnson to return to playing at a higher level.
This is how I see it. I just don't see how he can just get worse with a PG that makes others around him better.
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,220
And1: 5,763
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#124 » by DarkXaero » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:06 am

Jersey Generals wrote:Because he's turning 27 years old next season and you usually don't add to your game at that point in time? I'm flabberghasted by the group think today. I mean, seriously, it feels as if you're all trying to talk yourselves into something that just a few days ago you were all against.

Hanging hopes on the 26 year old Gerald Green, who was out of the league not 5 months ago, isn't insane to any of you? Seriously, I'm amazed right now.

One day, most of you bash Brooks, and now he's "oh, he'll improve and the Nets will be awesomer!"
Except Gerald Green is an exception who has already added to his game, AFTER he went down to the D-League. And who said anything about hanging hopes on Gerald Green? He'd be simply a nice bench piece to have.

And I don't bash Brooks. I've been against this trade ever since I've known about it, but there's nothing that can be done about it, other than to accept it now. And it's really not that bad of a situation (assuming Deron and Lopez are re-signed), because it gives us a pretty good playoffs team with top 3 potential in the East IMO. It's a far more exciting team than what we have had for the last 3 years.
User avatar
624
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,603
And1: 277
Joined: Sep 25, 2010

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#125 » by 624 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:07 am

Knicks fans seem to think this is a good trade for us, hm.



It is kind of cool to look at who Lopez was playing with last time he was healthy compared to now:

Harris
Morrow
Outlaw
Humphries
Lopez

vs

Deron
Johnson
Wallace
??
Lopez
Siem
Starter
Posts: 2,283
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 16, 2006

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#126 » by Siem » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:10 am

Im A Knicks fan that comes in peace..NJ couldnt sit around waiting for Dwight..Joe Johnson maybe overpaid but he's a top 4or5 SG that can also play the 3 and score the basketball. Deron is anywhere from #1-5 depending how u rank the pgs... Add in Crash, who's a great hustle man, along with a healthy Lopez, and Marshon and company...The Nets made a powermove...Championships are tough to come by and never guaranteed. When managment makes a team Real Contenders thats all you can ask for. Orlando in no way wanted to trade Dwight to Orlando, so i mean hey. I respect what NJ is doing.
flintsky21
Starter
Posts: 2,144
And1: 3,239
Joined: Oct 21, 2010
 

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#127 » by flintsky21 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 4:48 am

If Deron signs, then you guys have arguably top 10 players in their respective positions at the 1-2-3 spot. Lopez and potentially Humphries is a decent frontcourt as well. Johnson isn't so far off his prime yet I think. Maybe he could still be capable of pulling out games like this once in a while..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSrCL7dTqYQ[/youtube]
User avatar
Mad Guru
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,788
And1: 518
Joined: Jan 04, 2011

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#128 » by Mad Guru » Tue Jul 3, 2012 5:40 am

Joe Johnson is good, Williams is good, Wallace is good, Lopez is serviceable.

Howard is another level though, he is one player who, if he is on your team with even mediocre talent, makes you into a contender.
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#129 » by VCRJKidd15 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 6:05 am

I'm just watching a whole bunch of Joe Johnson highlights so I can pretend we got a player worth his money until we see him actually play

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puBcHqdfm7c[/youtube]
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#130 » by jeff1624 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 6:16 am

Mad Guru wrote:Joe Johnson is good, Williams is good, Wallace is good, Lopez is serviceable.

Howard is another level though, he is one player who, if he is on your team with even mediocre talent, makes you into a contender.



I'd argue that Lopez is better than both Wallace and Johnson. I hate how clueless (no offense to you) everyone is regarding Lopez.
Dat Leadership
User avatar
Mad Guru
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,788
And1: 518
Joined: Jan 04, 2011

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#131 » by Mad Guru » Tue Jul 3, 2012 6:19 am

jeff1624 wrote:
Mad Guru wrote:Joe Johnson is good, Williams is good, Wallace is good, Lopez is serviceable.

Howard is another level though, he is one player who, if he is on your team with even mediocre talent, makes you into a contender.



I'd argue that Lopez is better than both Wallace and Johnson. I hate how clueless (no offense to you) everyone is regarding Lopez.


I advocate defense and rebounding from the center position.
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#132 » by jeff1624 » Tue Jul 3, 2012 6:24 am

Mad Guru wrote:
jeff1624 wrote:
Mad Guru wrote:Joe Johnson is good, Williams is good, Wallace is good, Lopez is serviceable.

Howard is another level though, he is one player who, if he is on your team with even mediocre talent, makes you into a contender.



I'd argue that Lopez is better than both Wallace and Johnson. I hate how clueless (no offense to you) everyone is regarding Lopez.


I advocate defense and rebounding from the center position.



So you ignore everything else the player does? That makes a lot of sense. So you think Deandre Jordan is equal to lopez then... I mean Jordan is the better rebounder and blocks more shots...
Dat Leadership
User avatar
clifffside
Sophomore
Posts: 100
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#133 » by clifffside » Tue Jul 3, 2012 8:53 am

Brook Lopez is more than serviceable in my opinion. I believe we can put him in the "good" category, especially when you consider he isn't a finished product yet.

He's going to be a Top 5 Center in the next few years. That's not saying much in this era of big men, but just look at the stats beyond raw rebound and blocked shot numbers.

In 2009 he ranked 6th at his position in PER, 3rd in Value Added and 3rd in Estimated Wins Added
In 2010 he ranked 7th at his position in PER, 4th in Value Added and 4th in Estimated Wins Added

Offensively he's already an elite low post scorer, which is hard to find in today's NBA. Even good teams like Miami, OKC and Boston don't have that element at the 4/5 position.

When it comes to rebounding, it's an area that he needs to improve on. He was actually a good offensive rebounder up until Kris Humphries came along. The effort just hasn't been the same, but with a renewed emphasis I believe that part of his game will improve.

Defensively his size alone will alter shots and lead to him blocking a decent amount of shots but let's call a spade a spade: He's slow footed, therefore his achilles is switching on the pick and roll. That's never going to change. You can't teach speed, but you can improve body positioning and decision making. He hangs back a lot because he's slow and too hesitant at times when he does choose to close out on a jumper or cut off penetration. That indecision also effects the rebound numbers because he ends up in no man's land sometimes.

We need to put a defensive PF next to him to anchor the defense. It won't be Brook because

(A.) Teams are gonna constantly force him to make decisions on the pick and roll
(B.) He isn't athletic enough to consistently get over to clean up other people's mistakes or cut off penetration

But overall, with good coaching, more experience and an emphasis on improving his weaknesses, he'll be a top big man for years. Surrounding him with good players and putting him in a win-now atmosphere will only help him because that will force his game to improve.
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#134 » by treiz » Tue Jul 3, 2012 8:55 am

PetroNet wrote:
treiz wrote:Are we seriously prioritising JJ over Dwight? BK needs to go right now, he needs to go

If we got Dwight first then maybe (if possible) went for JJ I would be happy, but this is just to please the casual fan. Yes we would be a playoff team with Deron/JJ/Wallace/Brook but there's no way in hell are we contenders, we're just going to be stuck in the same place as Indiana.

Can't believe some are actually happy about this


i dont know what you were doing a month ago.... but id have been very happy if it was the ents playing theheat in the playoffs instead of praying my 22-win team would retain is free agent all-star PG in the offseason.


You really believe Indy would ever go further than the ECSF? You really think we have a chance against the Heat? There's no point being in the playoffs if you're just going to participate, you don't get a medal for that
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#135 » by treiz » Tue Jul 3, 2012 8:58 am

VCRJKidd15 wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:Why is it hard to expect Gerald Green to improve? He is already a much improved player after his renaissance, and I would expect him to add more to his game.
People just want to find an excuse to complain sadly


He's a good player, but if you expect him to be more than a spot starter/solid 7th man then you are being way too optimistic.

Don't forget that he was out of the league a few months ago.
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#136 » by treiz » Tue Jul 3, 2012 9:03 am

jeff1624 wrote:

So you ignore everything else the player does? That makes a lot of sense. So you think Deandre Jordan is equal to lopez then... I mean Jordan is the better rebounder and blocks more shots...


There's no point Jeff trying to convince any other fans besides our own that Brook is actually good. They get fixated on a certain stats/aspect and they berate any player with it. Look at how RealGM is with Lebron
gelek
Junior
Posts: 439
And1: 15
Joined: Nov 02, 2011

Re: Nets Trade For Joe Johnson 

Post#137 » by gelek » Tue Jul 3, 2012 9:38 am

Jersey Generals wrote:

Current MLE, sure, the future MLE will be the tax payer MLE, which is substantially smaller.




For what it's worth I don't think that you guys should use your full MLE or your BAE this year.

Say Dwight doesn't get traded (yet) but you get to keep Deron and Humphries (because you want to trade him?)

Deron 15M
Wallace 9M
Johnson 19M
Humphries 9M
Lopez 9M
7 capholds 3M

is a generously rounded down 64M meaning that after the full MLE and the BAET you'd be at 71M and could only add 3M more in salary (provided cap numbers stay the same, even if they rise, the raise won't be that high probably) after having 7 players.

And not only would that mean adding 5 - 8 players with absolute min contracts (even the min for vets with more than 3 years experience would be too expensive at that point) but you couldn't do any trade that adds salary going forward meaning if you want to trade for Howard Orlando would actually have to take on Money...

Return to Brooklyn Nets