Post#562 » by semi-sentient » Thu Jul 5, 2012 4:59 pm
Nash is no worse than what we've gotten for the past 15 years or so from our PG's. His defense is the least of my concerns, and he's actually pretty good at drawing charges.
Nash is one of the best play-makers this league has ever seen. He's right up there with Magic Johnson, and in terms of running an offense you could debate that he's just as good (although I'd always go with Magic because I'm a homer). The reality is that he's still one of the best offensive players in the league and has a huge impact even though he's approaching 40.
I can't believe anyone would compare Nash to Blake. Blake does next to nothing on offense. He brings the ball up the floor, passes it off to whoever is closest to him, then runs to the opposite corner to wait for a spot-up 3 (which he misses more times than not). He's got slightly better play-making skills than Bynum.
Now don't get me wrong I am a little concerned with our chemistry overall, but that's been a concern of mine for several seasons now. I've never bought into the Gasol/Bynum FC (especially since we lack shooters/cutters), so I believe that that's where the true problem lies and not necessarily with Nash.
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan