Jordan45822 wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!
there is your answer Laker fans
Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
MannyRam99
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 33
- Joined: Apr 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- J-Mezzy
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,246
- And1: 3,870
- Joined: Jan 21, 2004
- Location: Orlando
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Damn it! I was really hoping to trade him to LA. I can't stand the idea of getting Brook freaking Lopez + draft picks for Dwight
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
MannyRam99
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 33
- Joined: Apr 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
J-Mezzy wrote:Damn it! I was really hoping to trade him to LA. I can't stand the idea of getting Brook freaking Lopez + draft picks for Dwight
you better hope your management doesn't re-sign that guy, he can't rebound worth a *****, but he does have a nice post game.
he is the polar opposite to Dwight.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
WaffleRecord
- Starter
- Posts: 2,155
- And1: 729
- Joined: Aug 08, 2011
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
so Bynum is walking if Lakers don't lock him up now
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- CB-Blazer
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,161
- And1: 545
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.
Because the guy is a double, double machine and would instantly become the best front court player on the Cavs?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TheXFactor
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,976
- And1: 31
- Joined: Apr 19, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Jordan45822 wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!
Cleveland
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
AhaAha
- Junior
- Posts: 409
- And1: 15
- Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Bynum: There’s only one team on my list 
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Alex Kennedy @AlexKennedyNBA
Nets and Magic are looking for third team to take Kris Humphries. As @TommyDeeTKB said, Cavs are possibility. 76ers are also a possibility.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
If Magic and Lakers want to do a deal, each may need to call the bluff on Howard and Bynum stated unwillingness to accept extensions.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Among Bynum's short list of potential free agent landing spots in 2013, Houston is prominent with Dallas and Cleveland, sources tell Y!
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Manimal
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,624
- And1: 2,121
- Joined: Dec 14, 2011
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
TheXFactor wrote:Jordan45822 wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!
Cleveland
They have a better future than the Lakers right now.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Trader_Joe
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 29,176
- And1: 3,953
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Jordan45822 wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
If Magic and Lakers want to do a deal, each may need to call the bluff on Howard and Bynum stated unwillingness to accept extensions.
I think Bynum is more of a flight risk than Dwight. Orlando is looking like a franchise in disarray for the foreseeable future with out without Bynum. Dallas, Atlata and others will do their best to pounce on Bynum or Dwight.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
The Skyhook
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
OOO
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,554
- And1: 22
- Joined: Apr 04, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Both are bluffing. Hard.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Trader_Joe
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 29,176
- And1: 3,953
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Jordan45822 wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.
LOL
I just said that a few posts up.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TheXFactor
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,976
- And1: 31
- Joined: Apr 19, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Dajadeed
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,379
- And1: 1,643
- Joined: Feb 28, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Manimal wrote:
They have a better future than the Lakers right now.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Showtime:Part2
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,434
- And1: 514
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
wait wait wait, is drew threatening to not re-sign with LA?
Warspite:
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.



