Last Guardian wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:Anything Houston offers is better than Brooke and (4) late first round picks. Seriously.
Is there any concrete proof that Houston is offering something? Because I for one don't believe they are anywhere near this thing. It doesn't make sense for them to trade for Dwight one bit. They aren't a very good team so why would they give up potentially high picks for an obvious 1 yr rental. But if they are offering thats probably our best bet.
The picks they would give up wouldn't be that good.
It makes a lot of sense for them, because Houston is a team that is stuck in the middle. Not bad enough to truly rebuild, but not good enough to contend. A team who will between the 7 and 10 seed in the West every year, and has been for awhile. They're looking to take Dwight, and try to convince him to stay. If he doesn't, then he walks...and the stuff they gave up for him makes them so horrible they can rebuild from rock bottom. If he stays, they could end up with some cap flexibility in the not so distant future to bring in another star.
They're a relatively good sized market, with a top notch front office...and wouldn't have any issues getting another star in there.
Houston going for Howard is really a low risk, high reward scenario for them. Makes all the sense in the world when you think about it logically. Most NBA teams don't think this way, but they should. You either want to be on top, or on the very bottom for a rebuild. Being in the middle is the worst case scenario.