clipse375 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Shpati21 wrote:ESPN New York@ESPNNewYork
Stephen A. Smith: #Knicks are better off without #Lin http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_ ... jeremy-lin #Rockets #NYK
What phag.
Did you even read the article?
"They have experience, depth and happen to be two guards capable of running the show for a team with two stars in Amare and Melo who will want the ball when they are called upon to step up and play like stars.
Lin is no scrub. He can play. The Knicks, undoubtedly, will acknowledge this.
But while doing so, they should just make sure to ask two questions of anyone who thinks Lin deserves such an exorbitant amount of money:
What exactly did 25 games prove?
And when did Jeremy Lin -- in Year 3 of this deal -- become the second coming of Chris Paul?"
25 games is enough for some people to believe he's worth a max deal. This board is infected with morons.
He isn't a fluke, but he isn't the second coming either... He's going to be an average to good player. I don't think he'll ever reach that 'next' level or even be Ty Lawson. But he's fundamental and works hard. I'd love him back, but we're not lost without him.
























