KnicksGod wrote:I find the above to be disturbing and most would. You happen to be more skeptical than most about pubilc reports and that's fine. But you're projecting when you say I'm an arbiter of what's proper. Your stance is to rule out everything as proper until a final announcement. That's pretty extreme.
Extreme but correct. We don't know what's going to happen. Can you dispute that?
And my comments about you believing yourself the arbiter of what's proper is just highlighting a double-standard that exists.
Last evening you made the argument that you always depended Carmelo Anthony for years in arguments against posters like TKF. So if you, you of all people, are now (irrationally) criticizing him for this situation, then it MUST be a turning point in how most if not all Knicks fans view him.
In other words, "the tide follows me. It was perfectly reasonable to defend Melo when
I was, but it's no longer when
I'm not."
You said it plainly - if "I'M" turning on Melo, then it MUST mean something significant.
You OFTEN begin these rants with the phrase "think about it", which is almost always followed by tortured logic in which you instruct readers to consider something you figured out that they haven't.
I don't mind being accused of suggesting I'm smarter than other people (i think that's the principle message board arguments are naturally based on), I just find the double-standard amusing.