Post#716 » by sabonis » Sun Sep 9, 2012 2:35 pm
not defending my pick (and I don't need to, since there is no buyer's remorse right now), just my point of view for the Roy-Rose comparison.
I think the two are very different, you can expect something like 50 games with top 120 performance from Roy (but it may not happen) and his ceiling is 70 something games with top 80 performance. (but there is a chance he retires after 10 games as well)
on the other hand, you are guaranteed to get nothing from Rose for 50 or 60 games. and there is a risk that he may not return, or return and get only 20 mpg. So the risk level for rose isn't really worth it in my opinion. that's just my 2 cents.
Since 5 or 6 playoff caliber teams were interested in Roy, I thought "hey all those teams can't be stupid, I guess his knees are better than 2 seasons ago" and then I saw him make 5 shots in row from 5 different spots in his first practice. then I had to grab him.
it's extremely risky to pick him, that's for sure. but at least more risk worthy than Rose IMHO, that's why I targeted rose at 170s and grabbed Roy at 134. but hey, since I'm no doctor, I can't say anything about Roy's knees, only hope they will hold up.