FFL - 2012-13 - Voting on Rule Change - draft order posted

[jazzfan1971]

I'm not high on Waiters either. Too many red flags.

[jazzfan1971]

I didn't have 3 guys I wanted, I had one guy. And for once you folks didnt' take him before I picked.

Thank you.

[Breakdown777]

I didn't have 3 guys I wanted, I had one guy. And for once you folks didnt' take him before I picked.

Thank you.

Korver was my #2 after Harris. I can't believe he fell to 191. I can't think of too many starters guaranteed 25 minutes left on the board. He's only great for three's, but won't hurt in many other areas.

[insfo]

Can one of the mods fix the pick list on the first page of the draft thread to reflect this trade with Woody?

177+257+264
for
219+222+235

[bww78]

Haven't seen Flop since yesterday.

[floppymoose]

my top 10 are filled out now:

PG - Jeremy Lin
SG - James Harden
G - Brandon Rush
G - Nate Robinson
SF - Kawhi Leonard
PF - Mirza Teletovic
F - Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
F - Anthony Randolph
C - LaMarcus Aldridge
C - Channing Frye
Bench(x4) - 232, 249, 250, 272

[sabonis]

I trade: 190 + 223

WB trades: Dion Waiters + 258

Confirmed.

Waiters became expendable when I got Lee, so I didn't mind losing out a bit on the trade.

are u frigging kidding me lol. I said give me the best deal you can possibly make and you offered:

Waiters
for
Mullens+187

and now you do this? I think Curtis really knows everybody's dirty secrets so that he gets such deals. or just he emails everyone so many times that, at the end he comes across a great deal.

[jazzfan1971]

May as well post my top 10.

PG - Rondo
SG - Iggy
G - Felton
G - Barnes
SF - Korver
PF - Faried
F - Gee
F -
C - Bogut
C - Asik
U - Valanciunas
-------
U - Camby
U -
U -

By my eye that's 10 guys who will start in the NBA. Considering there are 150 starters and 20 teams in here each FFL team should have 7.5 starters on average. I feel pretty good about that.

Also, I traded the pick that turned into Jason Kidd. That trade down eventually ended up being Marcus Camby. I think it'll be interesting to see which NY dino gets the most run/stats this year.

[sabonis]

I have no idea how you have 10 starters, especially with Camby there. there are 2 or 3 more debatable ones as well, but how on earth will Camby start?

[jazzfan1971]

Camby is my 11th guy. Wasn't counting him among the starters.

[floppymoose]

I debated between Camby and AR and another couple of guys for my final top10 guy, who I wanted to have C eligibility.

[jazzfan1971]

Camby was a pretty hard decision for me. He's just so old. But, I couldn't see the younger guys I was looking at either get more minutes or be more productive in those minutes than Camby.

So, I go with the ancient one.

[floppymoose]

yah i pretty much agree, except possibly for AR. AR is still young (still!) and Karl may be the guy for him. We'll see I guess.

[writersblock]

Camby was a pretty hard decision for me. He's just so old. But, I couldn't see the younger guys I was looking at either get more minutes or be more productive in those minutes than Camby.

So, I go with the ancient one.

I thought about Camby at 190 but he's really only going to get 15 mpg.
My decision was between White and Magette, I think Magette would probably be the safer pick but White's ceiling was higher. Plus Magette's main strengths are points and Ft%, and my team is already strong in points. Ft hasn't been a focus of mine

[jazzfan1971]

He may only get 15 minutes, I don't think that's a terrible assumption, but he's probably good for 6.5-7 boards, .6 steals, and .9 blocks in 15 mintues. He's so productive.

Obviously I wish I could have drafted a productive guy getting 35 minutes a night, but, I think those folks are gone. There are still some starters who will get 25 min and be semi productive. But, for my catagories Camby was just a better fit.

My only problem is that I now have 4 guys who look to only have C eligibility. That's going to cost me some man games down the road.

[jazzfan1971]

I was pretty disappointed in Maggette last year. He was the default #1 option on his team and couldn't ever seem to get it going. Even when he did have a good game it was usually followed by 2 weeks of injury.

Not saying he won't be better this year, but, I didn't care for him last year.

[writersblock]

He may only get 15 minutes, I don't think that's a terrible assumption, but he's probably good for 6.5-7 boards, .6 steals, and .9 blocks in 15 mintues. He's so productive.

Obviously I wish I could have drafted a productive guy getting 35 minutes a night, but, I think those folks are gone. There are still some starters who will get 25 min and be semi productive. But, for my catagories Camby was just a better fit.

My only problem is that I now have 4 guys who look to only have C eligibility. That's going to cost me some man games down the road.

I only have 1 guy with c eligibility so we should talk.

[sabonis]

Camby is my 11th guy. Wasn't counting him among the starters.

ah sorry, didnt see that Utility Valanciunas, counted wrong. but still I think there are 3 more guys in that roster that may not start or lose their starting job midway through

[jazzfan1971]

Camby is my 11th guy. Wasn't counting him among the starters.

ah sorry, didnt see that Utility Valanciunas, counted wrong. but still I think there are 3 more guys in that roster that may not start or lose their starting job midway through

Yeah, I can't argue with that. I think those 3 are likely starters though.

[jazzfan1971]

I very nearly took Budinger. I am not high on Roy this year, and there are also mintues to be had at the 3 for Chase. His minutes look good to me.

Bad thing is that he just isn't that productive even when he gets minutes. Not a bad pick here though.