TOR|DEN
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
TOR|DEN
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,250
- And1: 39
- Joined: Jul 04, 2012
TOR|DEN
Let's be realistic, Rudy Gay is not happening. So, next best thing? Wilson Chandler or Danilo Gallinari. I don't care who, as long as we get one of those. Denver has a glut at SF, that's pretty damn apparent. They need to shed one of their SFs, I think. We need to acquire one.
So? Let's give 'em an SG, they seem to need one. Let's explore the potential deals available.
DeMar DeRozan for Danilo Gallinari straight up.
DeMar DeRozan for Wilson Chandler+filler(Mozgov? Randolph?)
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Gallinari+filler
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov etc.
Which one is more appealing, Denver fans. Take your pick.
So? Let's give 'em an SG, they seem to need one. Let's explore the potential deals available.
DeMar DeRozan for Danilo Gallinari straight up.
DeMar DeRozan for Wilson Chandler+filler(Mozgov? Randolph?)
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Gallinari+filler
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov etc.
Which one is more appealing, Denver fans. Take your pick.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 1,905
- Joined: Nov 12, 2008
-
Re: TOR|DEN
all are pretty bad for denver except maybe the last one.... and i dont think derozan can be traded for a while after just signing a contract
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,250
- And1: 39
- Joined: Jul 04, 2012
Re: TOR|DEN
COY0607 wrote:all are pretty bad for denver except maybe the last one.... and i dont think derozan can be traded for a while after just signing a contract
True, but the deal can happen later in the season - possibly at the deadline.
We can work on that last deal then. Possibly add something else. We might be able to acquire something like a late first or early second (low 30s) in exchange for expiring Calderon.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,169
- And1: 571
- Joined: Oct 30, 2009
-
Re: TOR|DEN
T-Ross the Boss wrote:We might be able to acquire something like a late first or early second (low 30s) in exchange for expiring Calderon.
Expirings haven't had this value since 2010.
Heat3Peat wrote:See this is why it's nice being a LeBron fan, no super hard allegiance to a team so there is no up and down emotions with me during a time like this.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,900
- And1: 2,334
- Joined: Dec 24, 2006
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: TOR|DEN
Saying that these Toronto/Denver trades have been beat to death would be an understatement.
Toronto does not have anything Denver is interested in trading Gallinari or Chandler for. We don't want DeRozan (especially after that extension). We don't want Amir Johnson. And we don't want Ed Davis.
Toronto does not have anything Denver is interested in trading Gallinari or Chandler for. We don't want DeRozan (especially after that extension). We don't want Amir Johnson. And we don't want Ed Davis.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,336
- And1: 1,074
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: TOR|DEN
There's no way in gods green earth that you get Gallinari for DeRozan.T-Ross the Boss wrote:Let's be realistic, Rudy Gay is not happening. So, next best thing? Wilson Chandler or Danilo Gallinari. I don't care who, as long as we get one of those. Denver has a glut at SF, that's pretty damn apparent. They need to shed one of their SFs, I think. We need to acquire one.
So? Let's give 'em an SG, they seem to need one. Let's explore the potential deals available.
DeMar DeRozan for Danilo Gallinari straight up.
DeMar DeRozan for Wilson Chandler+filler(Mozgov? Randolph?)
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Gallinari+filler
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov etc.
Which one is more appealing, Denver fans. Take your pick.
Ross + Johnson for Chandler + Mozgov could be a go.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,250
- And1: 39
- Joined: Jul 04, 2012
Re: TOR|DEN
I'm fine with it. Chandler would be a good piece on this team. We'll even throw in a needless 2nd like everyone on this board loves to do. 

Re: TOR|DEN
- youngthegiant
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,767
- And1: 5,700
- Joined: Aug 31, 2011
-
Re: TOR|DEN
i might have wanted derozan before the extension but not anymore, chandler for ross seems fair. Yes ross was a top 10 pick but his value has plummeted since the draft.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,510
- And1: 184
- Joined: Oct 08, 2012
- Location: South Park, CO
Re: TOR|DEN
Golabki wrote:There's no way in gods green earth that you get Gallinari for DeRozan.T-Ross the Boss wrote:Let's be realistic, Rudy Gay is not happening. So, next best thing? Wilson Chandler or Danilo Gallinari. I don't care who, as long as we get one of those. Denver has a glut at SF, that's pretty damn apparent. They need to shed one of their SFs, I think. We need to acquire one.
So? Let's give 'em an SG, they seem to need one. Let's explore the potential deals available.
DeMar DeRozan for Danilo Gallinari straight up.
DeMar DeRozan for Wilson Chandler+filler(Mozgov? Randolph?)
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Gallinari+filler
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov etc.
Which one is more appealing, Denver fans. Take your pick.
Ross + Johnson for Chandler + Mozgov could be a go.
Agreed. DeRozan and Gallinari arent even in the same damn stratoshpere.
Ross+Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov is actually something that could be beneficial to both teams.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 800
- And1: 167
- Joined: Apr 28, 2011
Re: TOR|DEN
The last deal is the only one even just slightly reasonable (I would do it, were I Masai), but the other are just... Let me tell you, I thought this was a joke thread.
Gallo for DD straight up? Don't do drugs, pal.
Gallo for DD straight up? Don't do drugs, pal.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,296
- And1: 1,869
- Joined: Apr 03, 2010
Re: TOR|DEN
youngthegiant wrote:i might have wanted derozan before the extension but not anymore, chandler for ross seems fair. Yes ross was a top 10 pick but his value has plummeted since the draft.
He's barely been played. The times he has you can see two way ability and room for growth. Watch games before you start talking.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,985
- And1: 4,843
- Joined: Mar 25, 2012
Re: TOR|DEN
torotoe wrote:Golabki wrote:There's no way in gods green earth that you get Gallinari for DeRozan.T-Ross the Boss wrote:Let's be realistic, Rudy Gay is not happening. So, next best thing? Wilson Chandler or Danilo Gallinari. I don't care who, as long as we get one of those. Denver has a glut at SF, that's pretty damn apparent. They need to shed one of their SFs, I think. We need to acquire one.
So? Let's give 'em an SG, they seem to need one. Let's explore the potential deals available.
DeMar DeRozan for Danilo Gallinari straight up.
DeMar DeRozan for Wilson Chandler+filler(Mozgov? Randolph?)
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Gallinari+filler
Terrence Ross, Amir Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov etc.
Which one is more appealing, Denver fans. Take your pick.
Ross + Johnson for Chandler + Mozgov could be a go.
Agreed. DeRozan and Gallinari arent even in the same damn stratoshpere.
Ross+Johnson for Chandler+Mozgov is actually something that could be beneficial to both teams.
Ross and Johnson for Chandler and Mozgov is actually a pretty good deal, though not sure if Nuggets really want to give up Mozgov like that.
Re: TOR|DEN
- Mich3006
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,492
- And1: 3,682
- Joined: Jul 04, 2009
- Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
-
Re: TOR|DEN
I´ll do Galinari, Randolph for DeRozan, Johnson, 1st Rd Pick (if they got one left...)
DEN: Lawson, DeRozan, Igoudala, Faried, McGee (Miller, Hamilton, Chandler, Johnson, Koufos)
TOR: Lowry, Fields, Galinari, Bargs, Valanciunas (Calderon, Ross, Kleiza, Randolph, Davis)
The lineups are "cool" with the deal, especially the Nuggets aquire much more depth on the PF...
DEN: Lawson, DeRozan, Igoudala, Faried, McGee (Miller, Hamilton, Chandler, Johnson, Koufos)
TOR: Lowry, Fields, Galinari, Bargs, Valanciunas (Calderon, Ross, Kleiza, Randolph, Davis)
The lineups are "cool" with the deal, especially the Nuggets aquire much more depth on the PF...
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 800
- And1: 167
- Joined: Apr 28, 2011
Re: TOR|DEN
^^^ DD wouldn't start over Chandler. Iggy would stay @SG and Chandler would start @SF.
You're saying you'd be willing to trade the arguable best player on the Nuggets plus a scrub for two players who would ride the bench in Denver?
I bet you're a Raptors fan...
You're saying you'd be willing to trade the arguable best player on the Nuggets plus a scrub for two players who would ride the bench in Denver?
I bet you're a Raptors fan...
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,510
- And1: 184
- Joined: Oct 08, 2012
- Location: South Park, CO
Re: TOR|DEN
Ayatollah wrote:I´ll do Galinari, Randolph for DeRozan, Johnson, 1st Rd Pick (if they got one left...)
DEN: Lawson, DeRozan, Igoudala, Faried, McGee (Miller, Hamilton, Chandler, Johnson, Koufos)
TOR: Lowry, Fields, Galinari, Bargs, Valanciunas (Calderon, Ross, Kleiza, Randolph, Davis)
The lineups are "cool" with the deal, especially the Nuggets aquire much more depth on the PF...
That's garbage. DeRozan is the next Maggette. Randolph is worth more than Johnson IMO. Both are serviceable players, but Randolph is on the much better contract.
You have to give value to get value. Its a very simple concept of two teams agreeing upon a trade where both parties leave satisfied. Easier said than done... If you want gallo, you have to give up someone who has high value. The package would start with JV, Bargnani or maybe even Lowry. That is the minimum offer that the nuggets will even answer the phone to discuss.
Re: TOR|DEN
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,128
- And1: 1,829
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
Re: TOR|DEN
I'd do
TRoss and Amir for Wilson Chandler
TRoss and Amir for Wilson Chandler
Return to Trades and Transactions