ImageImageImage

--

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#381 » by Vindicater » Sat Nov 3, 2012 8:56 am

Peezo wrote:
I had to watch on the Kings feed with their announcers and I thought on a few occasions they were pretty negative about the wolves (but they love JJ) and I just kept thinking I wonder if people feel like Jim Pete is this much of a homer. I was amazed at how much crying they did about calls going against the kings (although to be fair they did a lot of statement retracting after seeing replays).


I watched it too and I thought they were actually fair good in terms of commentary teams. They were biased towards their team but not excessively so and the way in which they backtracked on their initial opinions after watching replays was very honest and classy.

If you did not like these guys, wait until you see a Portland game with their announcers... uurrrghhh
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Veselyfan
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 107
Joined: Jan 01, 2012

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#382 » by Veselyfan » Sat Nov 3, 2012 10:14 am

Fantasatic defense by the Kings on Pek... I think he is still not 100 percent fit, but Luke,Barea and Roy should still find him more on the post. There were several situations when Pek had a great position and didnt get the pass to play 1 on 1 against his defender...
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#383 » by C.lupus » Sat Nov 3, 2012 1:27 pm

The J Rocka wrote:
Calinks wrote:Been on NBA TV for nearly two hours and they refuse to show highlights.

Media conspiracy already in motion.

Glad I'm not the only one that noticed. Guess we don't exist until we get Rubio and Love back. Though, we'll still be under the radar.

Well in their defense, Minnesota v. Sacramento without Love and Rubio is not exactly a marquee matchup and there weren't really any highlight plays from the game either.
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,109
And1: 147
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: somewhere on the Front Range

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#384 » by eyeteeth » Sat Nov 3, 2012 1:57 pm

Ah. A win. Good thing, since Sacto shouldn't be in the same building with us, much less give us any real competition. I thought everybody did a pretty good job. I assume that our shooters will start hitting shots (if they don't, we have a real problem). Loved watching AK-47. His D, even as hyped as it's been, is very impressive. Also, one of these days you guys are gonna chill out and realize that JJ Barea is awesome.
Image
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,628
And1: 1,320
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#385 » by andyhop » Sat Nov 3, 2012 2:57 pm

I think we are going to play a lot of really ugly games until we get Love back, as long as the apparent defensive improvement we have shown so far turns out to be real.It is going to be average to below average offense on our part hopefully combined with our defense making the oppositions offense worse than ours.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#386 » by Esohny » Sat Nov 3, 2012 3:08 pm

Vindicater wrote:
Peezo wrote:
I had to watch on the Kings feed with their announcers and I thought on a few occasions they were pretty negative about the wolves (but they love JJ) and I just kept thinking I wonder if people feel like Jim Pete is this much of a homer. I was amazed at how much crying they did about calls going against the kings (although to be fair they did a lot of statement retracting after seeing replays).


I watched it too and I thought they were actually fair good in terms of commentary teams. They were biased towards their team but not excessively so and the way in which they backtracked on their initial opinions after watching replays was very honest and classy.

If you did not like these guys, wait until you see a Portland game with their announcers... uurrrghhh


Or the Bulls announcers...eeesh.

As for the game, there were positives. The defensive effort was consistent all game and gave them success, they out-rebounded the Kings 53-43 (and 17-11 on the offensive side...nice) despite missing Love and Rubio, they passed well and only had 11 turnovers, and they went to the basket and got to the line 36 times. The only reason the game was as close as it was, was because guys were cold as hell and missing wide open shots. Pekovic, Budinger, Roy, and Shved are not going to shoot 25% overall and 0%(!) on threes very often.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,613
And1: 3,849
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#387 » by Basti » Sat Nov 3, 2012 4:40 pm

Sheenmue wrote:Great defensive effort in a terrible shooting night. Budinger was like watching Wes again missing 3 pointers.

The positive: 10 blocks. What was the record of blocks in the past season? Wolves was one of the worst teams with blocks and with Stiemsma and Kirilenko this could change radically.


Last year's record must have been a bit more than 10 blocks. 12 would be my guess in that one game where Darko had 7 or 8 blocks alone against the Mavs (IIRC).

Edit: Bingo. Not sure if it was the record of blocks but against the Mavs we had 12 blocks. http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=320125006
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,818
And1: 22,400
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: GT: Sacramento Kings (0-1) at Minnesota T-Wolves (0-0) 

Post#388 » by Klomp » Sat Nov 3, 2012 9:59 pm

Basti wrote:
Sheenmue wrote:Great defensive effort in a terrible shooting night. Budinger was like watching Wes again missing 3 pointers.

The positive: 10 blocks. What was the record of blocks in the past season? Wolves was one of the worst teams with blocks and with Stiemsma and Kirilenko this could change radically.


Last year's record must have been a bit more than 10 blocks. 12 would be my guess in that one game where Darko had 7 or 8 blocks alone against the Mavs (IIRC).

Edit: Bingo. Not sure if it was the record of blocks but against the Mavs we had 12 blocks. http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=320125006

Yup, that was the most

http://www.basketball-reference.com/tea ... 2/gamelog/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves