C-izMe wrote:Heat are 5-1 with Wade, Chalmers, Ray and Bosh playing great too. Without Lebron they'd still be 5-1 or 4-2. Most valuable means the team would fall apart without you. Melo leads the offense of the Knicks (they need a scorer) and is surprisingly a leader on defense right now.
Right now Melo deserves I more than Lebron.
That's hyperbole and isn't the definition of the MVP. There's no way to know what the Heat's record would be if LeBron wasn't playing or what the Knicks would be without Melo. Considering that the Knicks have been blowing teams out, you have even less ground to stand on in that regard when the Heat are winning some close games and LeBron is putting up near triple doubles in those games. As a quick example, the Heat were 15-1 last season in games that Wade didn't play.
Logically speaking, the most valuable player in the entire league is supposed to technically be the best player in the league. LeBron isn't getting penalized for the help he has, and it isn't affecting his ability to do his own job. He's shooting a whopping TWELVE percent higher than Melo. That's a huge difference. I'm pretty sure if you took away Chris Paul from the Clippers, they'd lose more than the Knicks losing Melo so by your definition, is Chris Paul the MVP? If Melo were taking every shot for the Knicks at his current efficiency, they'd have one of the worst offenses in the league. If LeBron were taking every shot for the Heat, they'd have the best offense in the league just based off of the math.
I don't like hyperbole because that's centered in bias and unrealistic calculations. Stick to the tangible.