Damon v. Ichiro...Does anyone agree with this???

34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#21 » by 34Celtic » Wed May 30, 2007 7:55 pm

Grandson but yeah. You have to understand, Damon hits in front of Jeter and sees better pitches to hit, his power numbers are also helped out by the fact that hes in Yankee Stadium. someone could have 30 bloop hits in a season and someone can have 30 lineouts that were smoked. Who would you say is a better player? Give me the guy who had the 30 lineouts any day over the player who had 30 bloop singles.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#22 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed May 30, 2007 8:04 pm

I would take Ichiro over Damon 100 times out of 100. I don't think that was the issue. Stats/observations/common sense...take your pick; all suggest Ichiro is the more valuable player.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#23 » by 34Celtic » Wed May 30, 2007 8:07 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:all suggest Ichiro is the more valuable player.


Exactly it doesn't take BABIP or RAC or GOD to see that.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#24 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed May 30, 2007 8:09 pm

No, but it gives you evidence to support your argument. Evidence is good.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#25 » by 34Celtic » Wed May 30, 2007 8:23 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:No, but it gives you evidence to support your argument. Evidence is good.


Or I could say that guy was 3-4 with 3 bloop singles and an RBI in a 14-3 loss,
Or that guy was 1-4 with 4 hard hit balls, the last one in the 8th inning that delivered the game winning RBI in a 4-3 win
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#26 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed May 30, 2007 8:27 pm

And using that as a basis for an argument would support you for all of the two minutes it'd take for someone to point out similar stats tied to better/worse players.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#27 » by 34Celtic » Wed May 30, 2007 9:01 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:And using that as a basis for an argument would support you for all of the two minutes it'd take for someone to point out similar stats tied to better/worse players.

All i'm saying is that I don't really need stats to say who's a better player. Jeter is better than Tejada...doesn't mean TEjada is no good. Chase Utley is a better second basemen than Robby Cano. I would take Arod over any third basemen in the league. I don't and shouldn't need stats to back up my arguements. These guys are better players than the other guys I listed. It doesn't mean they aren't good.

Return to Player Comparisons