Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,201
- And1: 2
- Joined: Sep 06, 2008
Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Monte Ellis+Sam Dalembert+Udoh
for
Derrick Williams+N.Pekovic+Ridnour(fill in)
for
Derrick Williams+N.Pekovic+Ridnour(fill in)
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,519
- And1: 7,909
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Terrible.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,887
- And1: 864
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Pekovic kills the deal. Williams and Ridnour for Monte I might consider, even though not a big fan of Monte's game.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,885
- And1: 264
- Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
karch34 wrote:Pekovic kills the deal. Williams and Ridnour for Monte I might consider, even though not a big fan of Monte's game.
Monte would be terrible next to Rubio. We need a dude who can shoot and move well without the ball, not a ball dominant slasher/scorer
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
pekovic = rfa
ellis = upcoming player option
ellis = upcoming player option

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,818
- And1: 22,400
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
I declined it in my head when I saw us getting Monta. Do not want.
Then I saw what we were giving up. Seriously?!
Then I saw what we were giving up. Seriously?!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,697
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Nov 13, 2012
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Ridnour/Barea/Williams for someone like Reddick or Afflalo is what i'm begging for
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,899
- And1: 846
- Joined: Aug 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Afflalo would be sick. Not sure how well he fits into our 2013-2014 budget considering the money he makes, but I'd even be willing to give up Shved for him. Afflalo is an excellent defender, can score if asked to and can shoot the 3 (40,4% 3PT). Reddick would also be excellent, perhaps even a better fit considering our lack of outside shooting, but I wouldn't be willing to give Shved for him.
How bad does Shved+Dwill for Afflalo sound? We ship Barea to another team and we've got ourselves a competent back-court.
Afflalo/Budinger
Rubio/Ridnour
How bad does Shved+Dwill for Afflalo sound? We ship Barea to another team and we've got ourselves a competent back-court.
Afflalo/Budinger
Rubio/Ridnour
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 882
- Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
What about Ridnour/Cunningham/Williams for Afflalo/Baby (aka Davis)
Shores up the PF spot in case of Love injury, with a small-ball of Baby/Love/Kirilenko in stretches.
I would rather give up Amundson than Cunningham, but I think Orlando has the leverage to demand better filler.
Shores up the PF spot in case of Love injury, with a small-ball of Baby/Love/Kirilenko in stretches.
I would rather give up Amundson than Cunningham, but I think Orlando has the leverage to demand better filler.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
guille_4 wrote:Afflalo would be sick. Not sure how well he fits into our 2013-2014 budget considering the money he makes, but I'd even be willing to give up Shved for him. Afflalo is an excellent defender, can score if asked to and can shoot the 3 (40,4% 3PT). Reddick would also be excellent, perhaps even a better fit considering our lack of outside shooting, but I wouldn't be willing to give Shved for him.
How bad does Shved+Dwill for Afflalo sound? We ship Barea to another team and we've got ourselves a competent back-court.
Afflalo/Budinger
Rubio/Ridnour
I would do that if we got a draft pick back from Orlando. They have Sixers and Nuggs picks, so i would want one of those.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,082
- And1: 3,619
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Pekovic is a deal breaker.
People on here bashing Monta should really think twice about what they say, though. Our starting backcourt produced exactly 2 (in words TWO!!!) points against Golden State while the Monta-lead Bucks sit at a comfortable 7 wins and 5 losses while having a more difficult schedule so far.
I prefer Afflalo as well but Monta would certainly not be the worst option to trade for.
People on here bashing Monta should really think twice about what they say, though. Our starting backcourt produced exactly 2 (in words TWO!!!) points against Golden State while the Monta-lead Bucks sit at a comfortable 7 wins and 5 losses while having a more difficult schedule so far.
I prefer Afflalo as well but Monta would certainly not be the worst option to trade for.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Turnover_21 wrote:guille_4 wrote:Afflalo would be sick. Not sure how well he fits into our 2013-2014 budget considering the money he makes, but I'd even be willing to give up Shved for him. Afflalo is an excellent defender, can score if asked to and can shoot the 3 (40,4% 3PT). Reddick would also be excellent, perhaps even a better fit considering our lack of outside shooting, but I wouldn't be willing to give Shved for him.
How bad does Shved+Dwill for Afflalo sound? We ship Barea to another team and we've got ourselves a competent back-court.
Afflalo/Budinger
Rubio/Ridnour
I would do that if we got a draft pick back from Orlando. They have Sixers and Nuggs picks, so i would want one of those.
This is getting off topic but I would not include Shved. Williams plus their choice of Ridnour or Barea would be my offer. If they want more, throw in the MEM pick (we suck at drafting anyway). Budinger primarily should be the backup 3 anyway.
Rubio/ Ridnour or Barea / Shved
Afflalo / Shved / Budinger
Kirilenko / Budinger
That's much better.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
As for the original trade, Pek is not getting moved for Monta freaking Ellis.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
C.lupus wrote:Turnover_21 wrote:guille_4 wrote:Afflalo would be sick. Not sure how well he fits into our 2013-2014 budget considering the money he makes, but I'd even be willing to give up Shved for him. Afflalo is an excellent defender, can score if asked to and can shoot the 3 (40,4% 3PT). Reddick would also be excellent, perhaps even a better fit considering our lack of outside shooting, but I wouldn't be willing to give Shved for him.
How bad does Shved+Dwill for Afflalo sound? We ship Barea to another team and we've got ourselves a competent back-court.
Afflalo/Budinger
Rubio/Ridnour
I would do that if we got a draft pick back from Orlando. They have Sixers and Nuggs picks, so i would want one of those.
This is getting off topic but I would not include Shved. Williams plus their choice of Ridnour or Barea would be my offer. If they want more, throw in the MEM pick (we suck at drafting anyway). Budinger primarily should be the backup 3 anyway.
Rubio/ Ridnour or Barea / Shved
Afflalo / Shved / Budinger
Kirilenko / Budinger
That's much better.
If we get Afflalo I'm afraid there won't be enough minutes for him and Shved at SG long term. Plus We have Bud who also needs minutes at both SG & SF
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
I personally think Ellis would be a good fit, and I have wanted him for a few years now (if it meant shipping Beasley out, which is obviously no longer an issue). But not at the expense of Pek.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,552
- And1: 3,719
- Joined: Nov 22, 2012
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Turnover_21 wrote:If we get Afflalo I'm afraid there won't be enough minutes for him and Shved at SG long term. Plus We have Bud who also needs minutes at both SG & SF
True. I'm more for Redick. +we get even whiter lol
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
- karch34
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,887
- And1: 864
- Joined: Jul 05, 2001
- Location: Valley of the Sun
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Foye wrote:Pekovic is a deal breaker.
People on here bashing Monta should really think twice about what they say, though. Our starting backcourt produced exactly 2 (in words TWO!!!) points against Golden State while the Monta-lead Bucks sit at a comfortable 7 wins and 5 losses while having a more difficult schedule so far.
I prefer Afflalo as well but Monta would certainly not be the worst option to trade for.
Agree. No dealing Pek. But while not the ideal fit, Monta is still a huge upgrade.
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
Turnover_21 wrote:
If we get Afflalo I'm afraid there won't be enough minutes for him and Shved at SG long term. Plus We have Bud who also needs minutes at both SG & SF
Shved can backup the PG spot, though. Get rid of Williams, Barea and Ridnour and there are a good 25 minutes a piece for Bud and Shved.
Rubio / Shved
Afflalo / Shved / Budinger
Kirilenko / Budinger
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
funkatron101 wrote:I personally think Ellis would be a good fit, and I have wanted him for a few years now (if it meant shipping Beasley out, which is obviously no longer an issue). But not at the expense of Pek.
i'd want ellis if he didn't start. he's more suited guarding the opposing team’s second unit so he’s not so much of a liability on the defensive end. he’d be an effective spark off the bench, but i’ve read he's not too keen on the idea.
it’s a moot point since we value ekovic higher anyway. my counter offer would not be much better because there are just certain guys i will not trade for ellis.

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Trade Proposal Bucks/Twolves
I like Monta for our team. We obviously need another scorer to compliment Love/Pek down low. Ellis has flaws but he can sure score the ball. Playing under a good coach in Adelman could help him to play some of his best ball in his career. He was an excellent role player back in the days of those good GSW teams with Baron Davis/Stephen Jackson.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves