shump is the new landry

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #61 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:45 am

StephNYKurry wrote:

prove it w/o a gif. i love gif's more than anyone. but prove to me you know what you're talking about

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #62 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:47 am

GONYK wrote:
HixNixKnicksTix wrote:OK.... SHUMP is NOT 100%. he should not be playing as much or be considered an important role on this team.

fair?

He's healthy, just not back to pre-injury form. No amount of not playing will get him there. Only playing.

He shouldn't be playing 20 mins a game?

Who should be getting his minutes?

Amare. White. Cut back on JR's mins and give some to a collective of Amare, White, and Copeland.

NY2k1 · Post #63 » by **NY2k1** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:50 am

HixNixKnicksTix wrote:
StephNYKurry wrote:

prove it w/o a gif. i love gif's more than anyone. but prove to me you know what you're talking about

It's been 5 games. FIVE!

I like to see how you'd do in that situation after tearing your ACL.

Someone said it took Tony Allen about two years to get back to what he was after tearing his ACL.

StephNYKurry · Post #64 » by **StephNYKurry** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:50 am

HixNixKnicksTix wrote:
StephNYKurry wrote:

prove it w/o a gif. i love gif's more than anyone. but prove to me you know what you're talking about

The bar exam is not administered by troglodytes

Post #65 » by **GONYK** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:50 am

HixNixKnicksTix wrote:
GONYK wrote:
HixNixKnicksTix wrote:OK.... SHUMP is NOT 100%. he should not be playing as much or be considered an important role on this team.

fair?

He's healthy, just not back to pre-injury form. No amount of not playing will get him there. Only playing.

He shouldn't be playing 20 mins a game?

Who should be getting his minutes?

Amare. White. Cut back on JR's mins and give some to a collective of Amare, White, and Copeland.

How has White and Copeland been better for the team than Shump?

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #66 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:52 am

They're all the same, really. But Shump has a big contract ahead of him because of media/you guys thinking he's better than he is (like landry.) The 3 of them are bench players and nothing more.

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #67 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:54 am

StephNYKurry wrote:
HixNixKnicksTix wrote:
StephNYKurry wrote:

prove it w/o a gif. i love gif's more than anyone. but prove to me you know what you're talking about

The bar exam is not administered by troglodytes

You're not funny or clever or anything that would make a girl wet.

Post #68 » by **kane2021** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:54 am

I think he looks ahead of schedule. And his jump shot has improved.

NY2k1 · Post #69 » by **NY2k1** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:00 am

HixNixKnicksTix wrote:They're all the same, really. But Shump has a big contract ahead of him because of media/you guys thinking he's better than he is (like landry.) The 3 of them are bench players and nothing more.

Lol, no.

Are you and the o/p the same posters? :lol:

Fury · Post #70 » by **Fury** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:03 am

Aggo deserves a suspension

Bran Fast Hands · Post #71 » by **Bran Fast Hands** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:15 am

I have no problem with this thread as long as the people down the other end of the scale admit that Shumpert probably isn't going to be the next Wade or whatever.

ctorres · Post #72 » by **ctorres** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:18 am

After this thread, I think it's now time to take a realgm break for at least a few days, maybe longer. Threads like these are making me lose it. I'm losing the joy of being a fan of the team and partaking in this forum when seeing a thread like this. I'm just losing it and the handful of posters who have this sick and twisted way of being so derragatory towards our players have had an abnormal effect on my psyche. The right thing to do would be to ignore certain posts and just focus on those whose opinions' matter most, but I don't have the energy at the moment to cipher through so much crap anymore. Thank you mods, BAT lifers, and all the rad posters who usually make up for the crap ones. I've gotten weak and have taken this forum too seriously (when that's the one thing you cannot let happen on here). It's time to go.

Shump is no Fields. I'm done.

aggo · Post #73 » by **aggo** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:20 am

Fury wrote:Aggo deserves a suspension

this was the thought process going through my head when making this thread:

shump wasnt good tonight

shump reverted back to grizzlies chuck mode after gettign clowned by Redick

shump hasnt look good at all since coming back

shump's FG% these 5 games is putrid

let's make a thread!

how do i get views?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Let's say he's the NEW LANDRY

hahahahahhHAHAHAHAHAHAAH wait, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA that will rile up the dogs

typing=============
title: shump is the new landry

hmmm should i really do this? ppl will get mad

body: discuss

ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, i havent made a robert randolph thread or called for amare's head for a while

ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh do i really believe this?

"submit"

Najeem27 · Post #74 » by **Najeem27** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:46 am

Trying to make something out of nothing. Pathetic thread

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #75 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:47 am

NY2k1 wrote:
HixNixKnicksTix wrote:They're all the same, really. But Shump has a big contract ahead of him because of media/you guys thinking he's better than he is (like landry.) The 3 of them are bench players and nothing more.

Lol, no.

Are you and the o/p the same posters?

Different posters. Say something that makes me think differently... other than LoL.

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #76 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:48 am

aliamri1017 wrote:Trying to make something out of nothing. Pathetic thread

Pathetic thread? You guys are reminding me of Lin, Fields, Gallo, and Ariza.

Shump hasn't produced yet. He is our starter! He should be a beast. He is NOT! case closed.

TheGarden · Post #77 » by **TheGarden** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:49 am

AggO wrote:
TheGarden wrote:LOL at Redick being a set shooter

did u watch the game bro?

shump got clowned by redick off sets for 7/7fgs with like 4 3pt shots where shump was not even within a 10 foot radius of redick.

Redick isn't just a set shooter, dude can shoot off the dribble, leaning, fading, any damn way

yes he schooled Shumpert but he's also schooled a ton of other NBA players

Najeem27 · Post #78 » by **Najeem27** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:50 am

HixNixKnicksTix wrote:
aliamri1017 wrote:Trying to make something out of nothing. Pathetic thread

Pathetic thread? You guys are reminding me of Lin, Fields, Gallo, and Ariza.

Shump hasn't produced yet. He is our starter! He should be a beast. He is NOT! case closed.

Your a dumbass

Case closed

Im Coming Home · Post #79 » by **Im Coming Home** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:50 am

Bran Fast Hands wrote:I have no problem with this thread as long as the people down the other end of the scale admit that Shumpert probably isn't going to be the next Wade or whatever.

Yes he will, you'll see. YOU'LL ALL SEE. Buahaha

HixNixKnicksTix · Post #80 » by **HixNixKnicksTix** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:52 am

TheGarden wrote:
AggO wrote:
TheGarden wrote:LOL at Redick being a set shooter

did u watch the game bro?

shump got clowned by redick off sets for 7/7fgs with like 4 3pt shots where shump was not even within a 10 foot radius of redick.

Redick isn't just a set shooter, dude can shoot off the dribble, leaning, fading, any damn way

yes he schooled Shumpert but he's also schooled a ton of other NBA players

he's shorter and not as athletic as shumpert. If people on this board want to Don Shump as the next DPOY they need to look at the games he plays in. J.J. is a set shooter. He may shoot off the dribble every now and then when he pump fakes. how dare you say he shoots leaning/fading aways??!! FOH