Ford: Jennings #2 most likely to be moved

Baddy Chuck · Post #221 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:16 pm

Godgers wrote:That being said everyone acts like Jennings is not a talented player. Hes a shoot first PG and in my opinon PGs like this are not players you build around but hes still young and talented.

I have no problem with a shoot first point guard.

I have problems with a shoot first point guard who isn't very good at scoring half of the games he plays.

whatthe_buck!? · Post #222 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:17 pm

BUCKnation wrote:I would love it if we could do a Jennings for Teague/Morrow/1st trade. I think we easily win that deal.

No question. If hambone stumbles and bumbles his way into completing a trade this good I would let him hambone me bareback... :-)

ComeBackRay34 · Post #223 » by **ComeBackRay34** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:20 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Godgers wrote:That being said everyone acts like Jennings is not a talented player. Hes a shoot first PG and in my opinon PGs like this are not players you build around but hes still young and talented.

I have no problem with a shoot first point guard.

I have problems with a shoot first point guard who isn't very good at scoring half of the games he plays.

Exactly. I wouldn't have a problem with a shoot first point guard, like say, Stephen Curry.

JayMKE · Post #224 » by **JayMKE** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:21 pm

If Orlando already declined some sort of a Redick for Jennings trade then there really is no point even talking to them. Why would they give up Harkless, their 1st, or whatever other young player?

I don't buy that Atlanta would offer Teague + a 1st, makes 0 sense for them. Offering Teague in general doesn't make that much sense. Can anybody definitively say if Dallas can offer a 1st or not?

HurricaneKid · Post #225 » by **HurricaneKid** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:21 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Don't understand why people would want Gordon. Bum knee, not happy about playing in New Orleans, and isn't that good in the first place.

He has been injured, but it's not like he has a chronic problem that will never go away. We're going to have to take a risk on a young player at some point.

Disagree he's "not that good" though. If you want to say he's been injured, fine.

Its not like that. It IS that.

He has missed 20+ games every year since his rookie year and IMO seems far more likely to line up Microfracture surgery than play a full season. Its too bad, he is a HELLUVA player when he is healthy. He just isn't ever healthy.

Sherman Douglas · Post #226 » by **Sherman Douglas** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:21 pm

I don't care what we get for Jennings. Not having the Bucks overpay him massively is the haul of the century in itself.

Baddy Chuck · Post #227 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:22 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I'd easily take Harkless over 4/5. ORL is in the mix as well, apparently. Vazquez does nothing for me.

Didn't see Orlando, but I'd take Harkless. I rode that bandwagon hard at draft time. Vasquez is just an asset to me in the sense that Kyle Lowry would be. There would definitely be buyers for him. In that same sense previously mentioned Lowry, Anderson or Afflalo would all be fine with me too. They are moveable pieces.

I prefer a young pieces or pick, I'd be happy with a moveable asset, I'd be content with just dumping Gooden if that was the best available deal. I have no interest in taking this drama past the deadline. None.

What about something like Brandon to Orlando, Monta and Redick to Boston and Rondo to us? I'd throw Boston Dunleavy and/or Sammy D for filers as well if needed.

RandyBreuer · Post #228 » by **RandyBreuer** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:22 pm

sneakerdust wrote:
whatthe_buck!? wrote:
mlloyd10 wrote:Sparky just read my email about the 3 way trade involving the Clippers and Mavs...They all liked it

If you're talking about the one that gets us Bledsoe and butler for luc and BJ I'm ok with it if we can't find anything better but I would hope that's not the best trade that's on the table...

mlloyd defines persistence

Hire that man!

mlloyd and Trader Joe are my favs on the big board

kebzach · Post #229 » by **kebzach** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:25 pm

BUCKnation wrote:Ive been saying for awhile now that if we could reunite Sampson and Gordon that would be great.

Are you a fan of the Houston Rockets?

jordan06 · Post #230 » by **jordan06** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:25 pm

Bye bye Brandon!!

Post #231 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:26 pm

I'd rather have NO's pick than Gordon, given that the Bucks would probably have to throw in their pick as well. The money is too high a risk IMO and if they'd be willing to give him up my guess is they know he won't be worth that contract.

I think NO and Milwaukee make for nice trade partners i it's true that Demps believes what Baddy needs is simply a change of scenery.

JayMKE · Post #232 » by **JayMKE** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:28 pm

Whoever is willing to part with the best pick is probably the deal we should do. Only veteran player I'd be interested in would be Rondo and not sure that Boston would even be interested.

Baddy Chuck · Post #233 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:28 pm

DrugBust wrote:I'd rather have NO's pick than Gordon, given that the Bucks would probably have to throw in their pick as well. The money is too high a risk IMO and if they'd be willing to give him up my guess is they know he won't be worth that contract.

I think NO and Milwaukee make for nice trade partners i it's true that Demps believes what Baddy needs is simply a change of scenery.

I think you are absolutely kidding yourself if you think we could get Gordon or that pick.

Teague is a longshot in my opinion too but if they do have interest in Jennings, you'd have to imagine it would be to start considering they have Lou Wiliams to play Jennings' role better then he ever could off the bench.

htr · Post #234 » by **htr** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:29 pm

Jennings for Austin Rivers?

sneakerdust · Post #235 » by **sneakerdust** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:29 pm

DrugBust wrote:I'd rather have NO's pick than Gordon, given that the Bucks would probably have to throw in their pick as well. The money is too high a risk IMO and if they'd be willing to give him up my guess is they know he won't be worth that contract.

I think NO and Milwaukee make for nice trade partners i it's true that Demps believes what Baddy needs is simply a change of scenery.

Demps = the Rooster whisperer

LUKE23 · Post #236 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:30 pm

I'm more than willing to risk our cap space on Eric Gordon, of all players. Hell, if we trade Jennings and don't extend Monta, we're going to be a hell of a long ways away from the league minimum salary as is. This is the type of risk the Bucks need to take.

sneakerdust · Post #237 » by **sneakerdust** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:31 pm

htr wrote:Jennings Boylan for Rondo Rivers?

LUKE23 · Post #238 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:31 pm

htr wrote:Jennings for Austin Rivers?

Nope.

HurricaneKid · Post #239 » by **HurricaneKid** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:31 pm

Harkless feels way too much like Toby to me. Why are you guys so high on him? Just because he hasn't embarrassed himself yet? The fact that he only got time when the 5 guys in front of him all got hurt/etc is a bad sign. If you can't play for a team trying to lose... well its not ideal.

Baddy Chuck · Post #240 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:31 pm

htr wrote:Jennings for Austin Rivers?

If there is one player I have less faith to ever be better then Brandon Jennings it's Austin Rivers. If he came with Anderson or Vasquez I'll take a shot. I'd put as much faith in him turning his game around that Chicago did with Joe Alexander.