rcklsscognition wrote:I am a risk taker, but it's still a lot easier to spend someone else's money than my own. I think if Henny laid out some sort of plan, like we'll risk losing JJ for the potential of this 1st rounder becoming XYZ player, he might be able to convince Dan to do it and take on more money. It all depends on what $ value Henny places on a draft pick I guess. Maybe we'll find out today/tomorrow.
With your personal business, would you gamble this way? Would you pay 70% of your bills for things you don't use just for a very slim chance that you will get a return. Because, more than half the players taken in the actual lottery part of the draft end up being bench players. Then, maybe only (1) or (2) out of every draft end up All-Stars. Thus, you are looking at maybe 10% chance of getting a player that can make a difference. Otherwise, you are looking at players that may help you to .500.
I see no reasonable reason to tack on more salary for a mid round pick. If it was top 5, hell yeah! Otherwise, hell no.