jumpmanjay wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd4yCoJ_QEE[/youtube]

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
jumpmanjay wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd4yCoJ_QEE[/youtube]

DuckIII wrote:Rerisen wrote:DuckIII wrote:Nope. My comments aren't based at all on whether or not he will actually sit out. They are based on the fact that he (through his brother) is publicly threatening to do it.
It can't be a threat because what is the action to stop the threat, the trade deadline is over when the piece came out. That's why I say it is most likely a protest.
That is a distinction with no difference.I also don't think Rose and Reggie are 100% on this
Based on the chronology of events, and Derrick's active participation in them, that is either naive or wishful thinking. Earlier in this thread you yourself were acknowledging that this was an organized plan of attack that Team Derrick has been executing for months.

jumpmanjay wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd4yCoJ_QEE[/youtube]
Gar Paxdorf wrote:This is all false. The Bulls are probably one of the quickest teams I can think of at trying to break every time they get a rebound, whether the PG is Rose, Kirk, or Nate. The reason their pace is slow is not because they don't run, it's because when they don't have an easy bucket as a result of running, and the defense is set, they actually take 24 seconds to get the shot they want. They also force the opponent to often take much of the clock because of their good defense. The Bulls have to take a while to get shots in the half court because they can't create shots at will. But they absolutely run whenever they get the chance. They very often run full speed like it's a fast break only to not quite beat the defense, and bring it out top to run a play. There is more to pace than the actual pace rankings.
A lot of the guys aren't good finishers (outside of Taj, Butler, Rose, etc), but that's a different issue.


LoveDaBoo wrote:That's the thing. I'm so disappointed with the Derrick Rose response. I was hoping he'd strongly criticize them or even possibly make his brother apologize. I think and hope that Derrick isn't on the same page as Reggie, but his response was too weak-sauce. These comments, at this point, help nothing. Derrick should have squashed this.
babblin-on wrote:I do think it's fair to say they were stupid in what they did. They failed in terms of fielding the best team possible for this season, they failed to set the team up with cap flexibility, they failed to avoid the luxury tax. They managed to mitigate the loss of some of the role players they let go with solid replacements, but they're not even positioned well to retain those guys. The only thing we can see on the horizon for improving the team seems centered around the arrival of a guy who hasn't played a single NBA game coming over some undetermined number of years in the future.
Rerisen wrote:The idea that Bulls players would be wrecked emotionally over Reggie Rose hinting that they can't beat Miami is high school drama stuff to me.
You mean Reggie saying the Bulls aren't good enough is going to wreck the locker room, but the Bulls Front Office literally shopping Carlos Boozer and Rip Hamilton, not to mention in the past even guys as important as Deng, isn't going to disrupt the locker room?
I don't get it.
Rerisen wrote:If Marco Belinelli is offended that the suggestion could be drawn that Korver is better, too bad, he should play better.


pduh01 wrote:First, and foremost at the very least Reggie Rose should at least keep it private.
OldSchoolNoBull wrote:So, was this an orchestrated, planned out thing, or did Reggie just get used? Which one is it?
Gar Paxdorf wrote:This is all false. The Bulls are probably one of the quickest teams I can think of at trying to break every time they get a rebound, whether the PG is Rose, Kirk, or Nate. The reason their pace is slow is not because they don't run, it's because when they don't have an easy bucket as a result of running, and the defense is set, they actually take 24 seconds to get the shot they want. They also force the opponent to often take much of the clock because of their good defense. The Bulls have to take a while to get shots in the half court because they can't create shots at will. But they absolutely run whenever they get the chance. They very often run full speed like it's a fast break only to not quite beat the defense, and bring it out top to run a play. There is more to pace than the actual pace rankings.

pduh01 wrote:Here is my take regarding Reggie Rose
First, and foremost at the very least Reggie Rose should at least keep it private. If he got something to say then say it to the front office in person, privately not publicly. I never a big fan when coaches, gms, players, and etc call out one or another in public(to the media.) it is better to keep these type of things privately, keep your mouth shut, and if you got something to say to a certain person then act like an adult, go to them and talk to that person/persons and do it privately.
Next thing is to a degree Reggie is right but in certain other angles he is wrong. The part of his wrong is he needs to understand what the Bulls salary cap situation at the moment, and who is actually available, and plus with our current assets what kind value they currently have right now that, and what they can get in return. The next thing is which I should say the begin with there is no superstar that is available at the moment if there is who then? Who is actually available? Dwight Howard? Uh last time I check he have no interest in playing for the Bulls at the moment. With the Bulls in a bad cap situation or I should say cap in hell(maybe not the right word to describe it but you get my drift.) we have limit option at the moment.
Right now this past trade deadline who is actually available to make the Bulls better? Uh let see Josh Smith? Yeah right only thing that make better is to clear cap room if you dump Deng, Noah, or Boozer. Hawks wouldn't take Boozer, Deng? Not worth Josh Smith sorry and beside I doubt Hawks want Deng, and I wouldn't even think about trading Noah for Josh Smith.
Onto the next player who else? Al Jefferson? Only if we get rid of Boozer some how so that isn't happening but I don't think he'll make a type of "impact" but he will help. Paul Milsap not in terms of impact I don't think but will help, and same I mention about Al Jefferson. There is NO ONE and I repeat no one that is available realistically to help the Bulls better especially in terms of impact for this past deadline. Only things that might be better is avoid the luxury tax, and minor deals but that is about it, period.
If you actually know who is available that can help the Bulls improve this past trade deadline I dare you to give me those names here on this forum when you respond to me please I dare you! Remember folks it takes two to tango regarding trades and even free agents who knows what really happen behind the scene what the Bulls organization did/trying to do via trades or free agents. Sometime one want to dance but other hesitate, and decide not to dance with you think about it folks. Of course it could be on the front office but it could be from the other party too again think about it.
By the way I kinda lol when Reggie mention Deng & Noah but no mention of Carlos Boozer.
KingCuban wrote:I think with this issue, we need to separate the parties here.
Just because im mad a Reggie, doesn't mean im supporting the front office or saying that we don't need to get better.
If im ripping into Reggie Rose, you can sure as **** know right now that it has nothing to do with the front office, but the potential ramifications this does to a team.
That was my first thought when this broke out. How the **** would Jo feel hearing/reading this **** from his captains brother/manager?
Again, forget about the front office, what they have or haven't done, but focus on the unnecessary division and factions this may create within a tight nit group.
Im not going to blame the loss to the Heat tonight on Reggie Rose, because you need to be better than that and we didn't execute, but the potential for this thing to be a beat up going forward for the rest of the season, which has the ability to destabilise all the great things this team has done to date this season, it would be a travesty.

LoveDaBoo wrote:That's the thing. I'm so disappointed with the Derrick Rose response. I was hoping he'd strongly criticize them or even possibly make his brother apologize. I think and hope that Derrick isn't on the same page as Reggie, but his response was too weak-sauce. These comments, at this point, help nothing. Derrick should have squashed this.