Image ImageImage Image

Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,711
And1: 4,009
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1361 » by panthermark » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:28 pm

GetBuLLish wrote:
panthermark wrote:Not saying Rose isn't a max player, but as far as a salary cap goes...if you want the $10M back to keep Korver and Brewer, look in Rose's checking account.


Hahaha. Wow. As if this thread couldn't get any worse. So now when the Bulls decide to dump players to save money, it's Rose's fault?!

This has gone from shocking to hilarious.


Sweet Jeebus! Are you just being this obtuse for he fun of it?

So they should have kept those players and had a +$80M payrol for a team that would not have D-Rose for most of the seasonl!!?! (That assumes we would not have Marco)

Are those players the "#2" needed to put Chicago over the top?!?!?!

Or did the Bulls say "D-Rose >>> Korver and Brewer....so those two have to go in order to not have an $80M, still lack a true #2, all in a year where we are not sure how Rose will be when he returns....IF he returns"?
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1362 » by blumeany » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:28 pm

LobosJordan wrote:The race card was kind of strange. I didn't sense any of that from people who were criticizing Rose yesterday and today. This board has a lot of divisions, and factions. But a racial divide, and tension is not one of them at least from what I have seen.


Wait, you guys aren't all white??!??!?! :lol:
2024: Maybe there's some hope?
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1363 » by blumeany » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:30 pm

Rose deserves max. Deng and Boozer are overpaid. Noah, IMO, is fairly paid. Rip is a waste of 5 mil. If Boozer was around Noah in pay and Deng was at about 8mil a year, and Rip was on ESPN doing analysis, we'd have like 13 mil to throw at an all-star guard.
2024: Maybe there's some hope?
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,886
And1: 37,298
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1364 » by DuckIII » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:30 pm

DaChozen1 wrote:Reggie needs to shut up...why? Because he spoke the truth?


Yes he needs to shut up. No that's not the reason.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
Sonny_D1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 221
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Location: Chicago

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1365 » by Sonny_D1 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:30 pm

Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.
CalilLove89
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 613
Joined: May 03, 2011

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1366 » by CalilLove89 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:30 pm

Gar Paxdorf wrote:Anyone have an explanation for why Derrick would issue his statement if he was behind Reggie's statements? Why wouldn't he just tell Gar and Pax that, hey guys, try to prove my brother wrong. I'm not commenting on this to the media.

Can anyone explain that?


They are trying to make this go away, people would of demanded a response by rose, so they got out ahead of it with a simple boilerplate statement.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,145
And1: 13,039
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1367 » by dice » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:30 pm

Gar Paxdorf wrote:Anyone have an explanation for why Derrick would issue his statement if he was behind Reggie's statements? Why wouldn't he just tell Gar and Pax that, hey guys, try to prove my brother wrong. I'm not commenting on this to the media.

Can anyone explain that?

it's possible that he didn't expect the media backlash
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
transplant
RealGM
Posts: 11,734
And1: 3,419
Joined: Aug 16, 2001
Location: state of perpetual confusion
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1368 » by transplant » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:31 pm

charity stripe wrote:DuckIII, stop stating its obvious that the comments made by Reggie came from Derrick. Its not obvious at all, and you can't state it as fact no matter what arbitrary analogy you use. As I mentioned before, its very possible that Reggie has grown tired of Derrick doing the vast majority of work on this team, as an overprotective older brother and manager of his career, he spoke out against it. Neither you nor I know the true motives behind Reggie's comments. A number of explanations are possible.

Imagine that you have a "manager" and he makes a very public statement saying that, if your employer doesn't get its act together, you may stay "sick" for quite a while. Now imagine that you don't agree with your manager.

What do you do?
Until the actual truth is more important to you than what you believe, you will never recognize the truth.

- Blatantly stolen from truebluefan
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 26,076
And1: 6,728
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1369 » by Indomitable » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:31 pm

DaChozen1 wrote:Reggie needs to shut up...why? Because he spoke the truth?

If it makes this team more proactive that is a good thing.
:banghead:
User avatar
LobosJordan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,459
And1: 1,320
Joined: Feb 23, 2012
Location: The Buck Stops Here
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1370 » by LobosJordan » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:31 pm

Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.

Have fun in your eternal slumber.

*Maniacal laughter*
CalilLove89
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 613
Joined: May 03, 2011

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1371 » by CalilLove89 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:32 pm

LobosJordan wrote:
Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.

Have fun in your eternal slumber.

*Maniacal laughter*


LOL

South Park comes to mind.
User avatar
Tenchi Ryu
RealGM
Posts: 17,372
And1: 6,426
Joined: Aug 04, 2012
Location: South Side Wild 100's
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1372 » by Tenchi Ryu » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:32 pm

DaChozen1 wrote:Reggie needs to shut up...why? Because he spoke the truth?

Because its some random nobody named Reggie Rose who was stupid enough to get unnecessary light on an already difficult situation. Threatening that Rose might not play cause of the lineup? Seriously, that is completely over the line and unprofessional. And has put unwanted PR negativity on Derrick.
[x] Fire Thibs
[x] Fire Kirk
[x] Fire Noah
[x] Fire GarPax
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,886
And1: 37,298
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1373 » by DuckIII » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:33 pm

Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.


Are you paraphrasing Derrick Rose?
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1374 » by blumeany » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:33 pm

LobosJordan wrote:
Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.

Have fun in your eternal slumber.

*Maniacal laughter*


Image

What year is this??!?
2024: Maybe there's some hope?
User avatar
Sonny_D1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 221
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Location: Chicago

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1375 » by Sonny_D1 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:33 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.


Are you paraphrasing Derrick Rose?


Something like that.
CalilLove89
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 613
Joined: May 03, 2011

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1376 » by CalilLove89 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:34 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Sonny_D1 wrote:Wake me up when we have a REAL chance at a championship.


Are you paraphrasing Derrick Rose?


The hits.

They keep coming.

Love this thread, full meltdown.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,661
And1: 10,107
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1377 » by League Circles » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:34 pm

I think a reasonable budget for a team trying to win a title is 80 mil. That's 16 mil per position. We're slightly overpaying at PG, justifiably of course. Notably overpaying at PF, though we do have a stronger PF tandem than almost every team IMO. We're notably underpaying at C for great production. At SF, we're underpaying slightly for great production. At SG, we're underpaying by a lot, and getting expected poor production due to it.

There's a clear, if not easy to execute, solution. Try to spend more at SG with the TPE and/or MMLE (plus keep RIP for depth), or, try to turn one of Boozer, Taj, Deng, or Jimmy into a much better SG. That's the most straightforward way to greater Bulls title chances, considering 2014 cap space luck depends on the desires of other players.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
The Explorer
RealGM
Posts: 10,796
And1: 3,360
Joined: Jul 11, 2005

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1378 » by The Explorer » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:34 pm

DuckIII wrote:
charity stripe wrote:DuckIII, stop stating its obvious that the comments made by Reggie came from Derrick. Its not obvious at all, and you can't state it as fact no matter what arbitrary analogy you use. As I mentioned before, its very possible that Reggie has grown tired of Derrick doing the vast majority of work on this team, as an overprotective older brother and manager of his career, he spoke out against it. Neither you nor I know the true motives behind Reggie's comments. A number of explanations are possible.


No one can look at the chronology and think otherwise rationally.



DuckIII wrote:I've edited both quoted posts, so if I'm altering both of your intent say so. But lets talk about this notion as Reg, rogue. Timeline:

Months before Rose's health and ability to return are knowable, Bucher reports that Rose's camp will hold out Rose, even if healthy enough to play, because the FO made moves or didn't make moves that bars title contention and that's all that matters to Rose. We laugh at and condemn Bucher for the report.

Bucher keeps reporting it.

Rose's teammates glow about how healthy and ready he is, many weeks ago.

Afterwards, Rose gives a planned interview to a national outlet, without the knowledge of the FO, that he might not play at all this season, and that he's totally okay with it if he doesn't.

This is weeks before the trade deadline.

Minutes after the trade deadline passes, Reg makes public statements entirely consistent with the Bucher reports and Derrick's own statements about not playing this year. Threatening that Rose might sit out the season because the team isn't good enough.

And despite this, the notion that Rose isn't on board and involved with how this played out is poorly supported. Explain that. Explain why that chronology invalidates this supposition or undercuts the rationale.

I would love nothing more than to be reassured that I am an idiot. My wife has been telling me that for years, but I remain unconvinced.



No part of your chronology is evidence of what Derrick Rose thinks about the roster and its lack of talent. At no point did Rose in the USA today interview indicate that he would sit out the season due to the ineptitude of the front office. That's what Reggie Rose thinks. Reggie has a different perspective than Derrick. As Sam Smith said, Rose is the same guy who was dying to get on the court with guys like Tyrus Thomas and Lindsey Hunter.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,711
And1: 4,009
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1379 » by panthermark » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:36 pm

nitetrain8603 wrote:Moreso asking if the Bulls didn't make improvements from that 2010-11 team, but were a 60 win team, why did they revert back to their 2009-2010 team?


The Bulls have not reverted back to their 2009 team. If anything, they reverted back to their 2010 (unless Boozer gets amnestied).

If the Bulls do amnesty Boozer (and we assume Rip is let go) this summer (also assuming we don't win it all), what it means is that the Bulls took their shot with Rip and Boozer, but an ACL injury and bad luck ate up those two seasons...time to re-load.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Reggie Rose rips Bulls' inactivity 

Post#1380 » by BeKuK » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:37 pm

DaChozen1 wrote:Reggie needs to shut up...why? Because he spoke the truth?


Yes! What he said is simply too much for this conservative camp here on the board. :wink:

I've never seen People go so crazy when somebody told the truth and I'm still so surprised.

Return to Chicago Bulls