ImageImageImage

SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

need4detroit
Analyst
Posts: 3,422
And1: 769
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
       

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#161 » by need4detroit » Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:07 pm

Olodipo has neither the height nor frame of Iggy.
Detroit Sports Videos http://www.youtube.com/user/need4detroit
bkseven wrote:He's between average and above average.
User avatar
King Bugs
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,610
And1: 326
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
   

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#162 » by King Bugs » Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:20 pm

Victor has spotty handles and can only go right on straight-line drives when he's not turning it over on those drives. Potential to be Iggy? Not even...

At max potential he could become a Luol Deng. He will more than likely be a defensive glue guy in the mold of a Thabo Sefolosha or Tony Allen.

Not that we couldn't use that, but is that what we want with a top 5 (currently) pick?
User avatar
mercury
Head Coach
Posts: 6,407
And1: 679
Joined: Jul 22, 2003

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#163 » by mercury » Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:33 pm

c-dot wrote:
mercury wrote:
c-dot wrote:Perimeter defense is kind of overrated, Interior defense is what really matters. Knight, Stuckey and Prince are all good perimeter defenders but can't win much games. If you look at a lot of the playoff teams in the east, their perimeter defense ranges from ok (New York) to bad (Milwaukee) but they have interior defense makes up for it. We need consistent scoring more than anything else on this team and we won't make the playoffs until we get it.

The Heat live off perimeter defense



Come on now, the Heat's best asset is not perimeter defense, although they are very good at it.

How many points do they get each game by creating t.o.s?.... then consider the challenge opponents have trying to get inside.
Easy buckets from defense = the most efficient offense.
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#164 » by Piston Pete » Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:49 pm

Oladipo first needs to prove he can be counted on to at least make an open jumper consistently before we look to draft him. He will be tested over and over again on this in every team's pre-draft workout session. By draft time, teams will have a much better idea of where he is offensively. And length might be an issue as well.

McLemore is the most well-rounded of the SGs, but for that reason, might be off the board by the time we pick.

Shabazz might be a decent consolation prize to McLemore. I see him and Oladipo pretty even ATM. Shabazz is the offensive guy, Oladipo is the defensive guy....

I think Porter is off the board by the time we pick. Either NO, CLE or PHO take him before we get a chance.
User avatar
c-dot
Rookie
Posts: 1,032
And1: 60
Joined: Apr 19, 2003
Location: ??????????????

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#165 » by c-dot » Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:58 pm

PistonHatersGetTheX wrote:Victor has spotty handles and can only go right on straight-line drives when he's not turning it over on those drives. Potential to be Iggy? Not even...

At max potential he could become a Luol Deng. He will more than likely be a defensive glue guy in the mold of a Thabo Sefolosha or Tony Allen.

Not that we couldn't use that, but is that what we want with a top 5 (currently) pick?


Comparing him to Deng is a overstatement imo, Deng is 4-5 inches taller and was NBA ready after his freshman year.
Clarity
Banned User
Posts: 5,610
And1: 843
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
   

Re: SF Prospect Debate: Porter vs. Oladipo vs Muhammad 

Post#166 » by Clarity » Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:21 pm

These Oladipo comparisons are hilarious

Return to Detroit Pistons