JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Post #61 » by **Inigo Montoya** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:16 am

Blackie wrote:Resign Mo

sure. as a 6th man. as a starter? let's not get carried away.

great win. fun game to watch. great effort all around. the jazz were very focused all game long. corbin managed the game well most of the time.

Post #62 » by **StocktonShorts** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:17 am

Is there a correlation between Ty's game management and the number of decent players available?

reapaman · Post #63 » by **reapaman** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:19 am

Blackie wrote:Resign Mo

Mo can be the mascot or water boy but I wouldn't want him to be the ball boy much less ever touch a basketball again while with the jazz.

Blackie · Post #64 » by **Blackie** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:21 am

I like Mo's agressiveness. It gets the other players involved.

seejaydeja · Post #65 » by **seejaydeja** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:22 am

reapaman wrote:
Blackie wrote:Resign Mo

Mo can be the mascot or water boy but I wouldn't want him to be the ball boy much less ever touch a basketball again while with the jazz.

obviously the dude isn't our PG of the future but that's harsh

Post #66 » by **StocktonShorts** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:24 am

29 assists on 41 FGs.

BigAlymphoma · Post #67 » by **BigAlymphoma** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:35 am

The OKC game on Tuesday is absolutely huge.

The59Sound · Post #68 » by **The59Sound** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 2:58 am

Blackie wrote:I like Mo's agressiveness. It gets the other players involved.

It almost always does the opposite.

Post #69 » by **StocktonShorts** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 3:05 am

The59Sound wrote:
Blackie wrote:I like Mo's agressiveness. It gets the other players involved.

It almost always does the opposite.

That's just what I was thinking.

RyanStorm · Post #70 » by **RyanStorm** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 8:33 pm

We are going to need a Vet next year to run this team, and I am sure the Jazz Club believe this also, but for the sake of future years, were likely to find our next PG(even for bench), even if its not like a lillard.

I think based off his current injury recovery, team experience, history, etc. Mo is the most likely candidate to be the starting PG next year. Of Course there is options...

Post #71 » by **StocktonShorts** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 9:42 pm

I think Mo is the wrong guy for this team going forward, especially if they want him to be the starting PG.

I'll be stunned if they bring him back.

red4hf · Post #72 » by **red4hf** » Mon Apr 8, 2013 10:04 pm

I could see the Jazz bringing Mo back on a one year deal.......

Post #73 » by **StocktonShorts** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 12:26 am

red4hf wrote:I could see the Jazz bringing Mo back on a one year deal.......

I could see it, too; I guess I shouldn't say I'd be stunned, "disappointed" would be a better word for it.

I think Mo is unlikely to sign just a one year deal. He'll want a 3-4 year deal from someone.

babyjax13 · Post #74 » by **babyjax13** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 2:51 am

As a backup, a la Jason Terry, I'd love him. What he is now? No.

Post #75 » by **StocktonShorts** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 3:08 am

babyjax13 wrote:As a backup, a la Jason Terry, I'd love him. What he is now? No.

I agree. I just don't see Mo consenting to that role on this team unless the Jazz miraculously land a top 10 PG.

RyanStorm · Post #76 » by **RyanStorm** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 3:25 am

So back to square one, we want a vet to play bench of Mo or Terry's caliber, but want a young super-promising point guard like what we got in Dwill to be our starter....

As much as I want that, I don't think it is happening next year, maybe the year after. Cause the only young super-promising PG's is Burke, and god knows if he does good in NBA(I think so, but there are others who might do better).

Personally I want Burks - Hayward - Favors - Kanter to start next year, even if that means starting Burks at PG!

babyjax13 · Post #77 » by **babyjax13** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 5:39 am

StocktonShorts wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:As a backup, a la Jason Terry, I'd love him. What he is now? No.

I agree. I just don't see Mo consenting to that role on this team unless the Jazz miraculously land a top 10 PG.

I think we have the assets to get what we want, though. I guess we'll see...maybe we could get in a three way with Pheonix and New Orleans for Dragic.

The59Sound · Post #78 » by **The59Sound** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 1:46 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
StocktonShorts wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:As a backup, a la Jason Terry, I'd love him. What he is now? No.

I agree. I just don't see Mo consenting to that role on this team unless the Jazz miraculously land a top 10 PG.

I think we have the assets to get what we want, though. I guess we'll see...maybe we could get in a three way with Pheonix and New Orleans for Dragic.

Would love Dragic, but what do we have that we're willing to part with and that they (NO or Phoenix) would want?

Post #79 » by **Inigo Montoya** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 4:26 pm

cap space for one. phoenix's owners are known for being cheap, and dragic is making 7.5M per year. they may end up drafting another pg - smart, MCW or burke, and they have marshall too. so it may serve their purpose to get rid of dragic for a cheaper and younger player. it will also help them tank next season in a good draft. same goes for NO. they may elect to go for a young and cheap PG in this draft instead of electing to pay big bucks to vasquez.

The59Sound · Post #80 » by **The59Sound** » Tue Apr 9, 2013 6:49 pm

Inigo Montoya wrote:cap space for one. phoenix's owners are known for being cheap, and dragic is making 7.5M per year. they may end up drafting another pg - smart, MCW or burke, and they have marshall too. so it may serve their purpose to get rid of dragic for a cheaper and younger player. it will also help them tank next season in a good draft. same goes for NO. they may elect to go for a young and cheap PG in this draft instead of electing to pay big bucks to vasquez.

I'm skeptical of either team giving up Dragic or Vasquez for cap space (are there tax issues at play here?), but I'd be thrilled to acquire one of them.