San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
justinandimcool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 1,097
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
 

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#101 » by justinandimcool » Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:18 pm

ItsDaBrush wrote:The Spurs have no class, NONE


:roll: If the barber shop rumor is true then I don't see it being classless.

Even then, being classless >>>>>>>> keeping a locker room cancer and distraction on the team

Just realized you're the china glass metaphor loving Spurs hater though.
Image
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,279
And1: 10,045
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#102 » by Blame Rasho » Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:21 pm

ItsDaBrush wrote:The Spurs have no class, NONE


What the **** are you talking about...
sonictecture
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,624
And1: 1,113
Joined: May 26, 2002

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#103 » by sonictecture » Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:36 pm

So the Spurs set up a system that stated you don't rely on free agency because history shows you will have to overpay, but signed Richard Jefferson to a bloated contract. Realizing that mistake they traded Jefferson, but to do so they had to break another one of their tenants, don't waste time trying to rehabilitate head cases, with Stephen Jackson.

The waiving of Jackson was strategic, but they were able to implement the strategy because shortly after signing Jefferson they realized they had strayed from their principles and went about finding young players to compliment the core. The development of Leonard allowed the Spurs to waive Jackson and strategically send a message to the current players that the distractions of the regular season were over and it was time to come together for the playoffs.

The Spurs deserve credit for overcoming what could have been a franchise crippling mistake in signing Jefferson.
Illuminati_
Starter
Posts: 2,105
And1: 346
Joined: Oct 31, 2009

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#104 » by Illuminati_ » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:06 pm

Lol at taking anything from the media as fact. It's too easy to blame Jackson.
Illuminati_
Starter
Posts: 2,105
And1: 346
Joined: Oct 31, 2009

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#105 » by Illuminati_ » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:07 pm

My guess it was contractual..there was a price or incentive they didn't want to pay. Like its been mentioned Jackson wasn't sent home..he's been getting PT. you sheep can believe espn rumours doe.
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,955
And1: 10,696
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#106 » by TheNewEra » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:11 pm

If true they had an agreement to play out the season together when Jackson wanted out then it is a punk move to cut him and not let him play elsewhere.
User avatar
NYK_89
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,855
And1: 72
Joined: Mar 03, 2011

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#107 » by NYK_89 » Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:52 pm

Man the whole can't be picked up think just **** on my life, i saw he got waived and i was like OMFG drop james white put him in right **** now.
yellowsub264
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 149
Joined: Jun 25, 2008
Location: Las Vegas

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#108 » by yellowsub264 » Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:01 pm

Serious question, if the spurs win the championship does Jackson get a ring? Same thing, what if a player is traded at the trade deadline, the team he was traded from wins the championship, does the traded player get a ring? I feel like I should know these answers, but I never really thought about it lol.
God gave me a passion for basketball that burns inside of me like that of a venereal disease
User avatar
justinandimcool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 1,097
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
 

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#109 » by justinandimcool » Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:39 pm

Illuminati_ wrote:My guess it was contractual..there was a price or incentive they didn't want to pay. Like its been mentioned Jackson wasn't sent home..he's been getting PT. you sheep can believe espn rumours doe.



And if we believe instigating conspiracies like yours, we'll be even worse sheep :lol:
Image
User avatar
justinandimcool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 1,097
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
 

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#110 » by justinandimcool » Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:42 pm

yellowsub264 wrote:Serious question, if the spurs win the championship does Jackson get a ring? Same thing, what if a player is traded at the trade deadline, the team he was traded from wins the championship, does the traded player get a ring? I feel like I should know these answers, but I never really thought about it lol.


Rings are actually not mandatory. If an owner was enough of an ****, he could not give rings at all (see Cuban wanting to give belts instead :lol:). Some owners give rings to everyone, including arena maintenance. Others may want to pay for less rings- just players and coaches. If they want to pay for an extra ring for someone who was traded and waived, it's up to them.

When the 04 Red Sox traded Nomar away and eventually won the World Series, the players voted on whether or not he should get one, and they voted yes.
Image
huskerdu
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 361
Joined: May 06, 2007
   

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#111 » by huskerdu » Sun May 26, 2013 6:28 am

Sjax blew a golden opportunity to get to his 2nd Finals. :-?
Flash Falcon X
General Manager
Posts: 8,997
And1: 4,716
Joined: Oct 19, 2010
 

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#112 » by Flash Falcon X » Sun May 26, 2013 6:43 am

It would have been nice to see Jackson win a 2nd championship. Nice way to put your career in a full circle when you're starting to decline.
#DubNation
qotsa
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 34
Joined: Dec 01, 2008

Re: San Antonio waives Stephen Jackson 

Post#113 » by qotsa » Sun May 26, 2013 7:38 am

Poor schmuck

Return to The General Board